A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Johnston
Genetics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
J R Erickson ◽  
M Johnston

Abstract Expression of the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is subject to glucose repression, a global regulatory mechanism that requires several gene products. We have isolated GAL83, one of these genes required for glucose repression. The sequence of the predicted Gal83 protein is homologous to two other yeast proteins, Sip1p and Sip2p, which are known to interact with the SNF1 gene product, a protein kinase required for expression of the GAL genes. High-copy clones of SIP1 and SIP2 cross-complement the GAL83-2000 mutation (as well as GAL82-1, a mutation in another gene involved in glucose repression), suggesting that these four genes may perform similar functions in glucose repression. Consistent with this hypothesis, a gal83 null mutation does not affect glucose repression, and only dominant or partially dominant mutations exist in GAL83 (and GAL82). Two other observations were made that suggests that GAL83 functions interdependently with GAL82 and REG1 (another gene involved in glucose repression) to effect glucose repression: 1) REG1 on a low-copy plasmid cross-complements GAL82-1 and GAL83-2000 mutations, and 2) all pairwise combinations of reg1, GAL82-1 and GAL83-2000 fail to complement one another. Such unlinked noncomplementation suggests that Gal83p, Gal82p and Reg1p may interact with one another. Possible roles for GAL83, GAL82 and REG1 are discussed in relation to SNF1, SIP1 and SIP2.


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 3834-3841 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Johnston ◽  
J S Flick ◽  
T Pexton

Expression of the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is induced during growth on galactose by a well-characterized regulatory mechanism that relieves Gal80p inhibition of the Gal4p transcriptional activator. Growth on glucose overrides induction by galactose. Glucose repression acts at three levels to reduce GAL1 expression: (i) it reduces the level of functional inducer in the cell; (ii) it lowers cellular levels of Gal4p by repressing GAL4 transcription; and (iii) it inhibits Gal4p function through a repression element in the GAL1 promoter. We quantified the amount of repression provided by each mechanism by assaying strains with none, one, two, or all three of the repression mechanisms intact. In a strain lacking all three repression mechanisms, there was almost no glucose repression of GAL1 expression, suggesting that these are the major, possibly the only, mechanisms of glucose repression acting upon the GAL genes. The mechanism of repression that acts to reduce Gal4p levels in the cell is established slowly (hours after glucose addition), probably because Gal4p is stable. By contrast, the repression acting through the upstream repression sequence element in the GAL1 promoter is established rapidly (within minutes of glucose addition). Thus, these three mechanisms of repression collaborate to repress GAL1 expression rapidly and stringently. The Mig1p repressor is responsible for most (possibly all) of these repression mechanisms. We show that for GAL1 expression, mig1 mutations are epistatic to snf1 mutations, indicating that Mig1p acts after the Snf1p protein kinase in the glucose repression pathway, which suggests that Snf1p is an inhibitor of Mig1p.


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 3834-3841
Author(s):  
M Johnston ◽  
J S Flick ◽  
T Pexton

Expression of the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is induced during growth on galactose by a well-characterized regulatory mechanism that relieves Gal80p inhibition of the Gal4p transcriptional activator. Growth on glucose overrides induction by galactose. Glucose repression acts at three levels to reduce GAL1 expression: (i) it reduces the level of functional inducer in the cell; (ii) it lowers cellular levels of Gal4p by repressing GAL4 transcription; and (iii) it inhibits Gal4p function through a repression element in the GAL1 promoter. We quantified the amount of repression provided by each mechanism by assaying strains with none, one, two, or all three of the repression mechanisms intact. In a strain lacking all three repression mechanisms, there was almost no glucose repression of GAL1 expression, suggesting that these are the major, possibly the only, mechanisms of glucose repression acting upon the GAL genes. The mechanism of repression that acts to reduce Gal4p levels in the cell is established slowly (hours after glucose addition), probably because Gal4p is stable. By contrast, the repression acting through the upstream repression sequence element in the GAL1 promoter is established rapidly (within minutes of glucose addition). Thus, these three mechanisms of repression collaborate to repress GAL1 expression rapidly and stringently. The Mig1p repressor is responsible for most (possibly all) of these repression mechanisms. We show that for GAL1 expression, mig1 mutations are epistatic to snf1 mutations, indicating that Mig1p acts after the Snf1p protein kinase in the glucose repression pathway, which suggests that Snf1p is an inhibitor of Mig1p.


Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 1205-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S Smith ◽  
Carrie Baker Brachmann ◽  
Lorraine Pillus ◽  
Jef D Boeke

Abstract Transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs at the silent mating-type loci HML and HMR, at telomeres, and at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus RDN1. Silencing in the rDNA occurs by a novel mechanism that depends on a single Silent Information Regulator (SIR) gene, SIR2. SIR4, essential for other silenced loci, paradoxically inhibits rDNA silencing. In this study, we elucidate a regulatory mechanism for rDNA silencing based on the finding that rDNA silencing strength directly correlates with cellular Sir2 protein levels. The endogenous level of Sir2p was shown to be limiting for rDNA silencing. Furthermore, small changes in Sir2p levels altered rDNA silencing strength. In rDNA silencing phenotypes, sir2 mutations were shown to be epistatic to sir4 mutations, indicating that SIR4 inhibition of rDNA silencing is mediated through SIR2. Furthermore, rDNA silencing is insensitive to SIR3 overexpression, but is severely reduced by overexpression of full-length Sir4p or a fragment of Sir4p that interacts with Sir2p. This negative effect of SIR4 overexpression was overridden by co-overexpression of SIR2, suggesting that SIR4 directly inhibits the rDNA silencing function of SIR2. Finally, genetic manipulations of SIR4 previously shown to promote extended life span also resulted in enhanced rDNA silencing. We propose a simple model in which telomeres act as regulators of rDNA silencing by competing for limiting amounts of Sir2 protein.


2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1715-1719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Gancedo ◽  
Carmen-Lisset Flores ◽  
Juana M. Gancedo

The present article addresses the possibilities offered by yeasts to study the problem of the evolution of moonlighting proteins. It focuses on data available on hexokinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that moonlights in catabolite repression and on galactokinase from Kluyveromyces lactis that moonlights controlling the induction of the GAL genes. Possible experimental approaches to studying the evolution of moonlighting hexose kinases are suggested.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 5535-5542 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Selleck ◽  
Israël Fortin ◽  
Decha Sermwittayawong ◽  
Jacques Côté ◽  
Song Tan

ABSTRACT Chromatin modification complexes are key gene regulatory factors which posttranslationally modify the histone component of chromatin with epigenetic marks. To address what features of chromatin modification complexes are responsible for the specific recognition of nucleosomes compared to naked histones, we have performed a functional dissection of the Esa1-containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Piccolo NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex. Our studies define the Piccolo determinants sufficient to assemble its three subunits into a complex as well as Piccolo determinants sufficient to specifically acetylate a chromatin template. We find that the conserved Enhancer of Polycomb A (EPcA) homology region of the Epl1 component and the N-terminal 165 amino acids of the Yng2 component of Piccolo are sufficient with Esa1 to specifically act on nucleosomes. We also find that the Esa1 chromodomain plays a critical role in Piccolo's ability to distinguish between histones and nucleosomes. In particular, specific point mutations in the chromodomain putative hydrophobic cage which strongly hinder growth in yeast greatly reduce histone acetyltransferase activity on nucleosome substrates, independent of histone methylation or other modifications. However, the chromodomain is not required for Piccolo to bind to nucleosomes, suggesting a role for the chromodomain in a catalysis step after nucleosome binding.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S McPheeters ◽  
Nicole Cremona ◽  
Sham Sunder ◽  
Huei-Mei Chen ◽  
Nicole Averbeck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document