DIFFERENTIAL PROTEOMICS AND METABOLOMICS OF SHOOTS OF VETIVER GRASS (CHRYSOPOGON ZIZANIOIDES) USED TO TREAT ACID MINE DRAINAGE

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Kiiskila ◽  
◽  
Dibyendu Sarkar ◽  
Dibyendu Sarkar ◽  
Rupali Datta ◽  
...  
Chemosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 240 ◽  
pp. 124961
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Kiiskila ◽  
Kefeng Li ◽  
Dibyendu Sarkar ◽  
Rupali Datta

2019 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Kiiskila ◽  
Dibyendu Sarkar ◽  
Saumik Panja ◽  
Shivendra V. Sahi ◽  
Rupali Datta

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 2301-2311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel A. Caraballo ◽  
Tobias S. Rötting ◽  
Francisco Macías ◽  
José Miguel Nieto ◽  
Carlos Ayora

2009 ◽  
Vol 71-73 ◽  
pp. 557-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Wei Chen ◽  
Jian Kang Wen ◽  
Xing Yu Liu

An integrated sulfate reducing process was used to treat Acid Mine Drainage with high concentrations of Cu2+, Fe and SO42-. The water treatment system integrated a sulfidogenic UASB bioreactor with a precipitation reactor which was used to recover copper. Sodium lactate was used as energy source. The effective volume of the UASB reactor was 2 L and the hydraulic retention time was 12.57h. In the sulphate removal reactor, sulphate was removed from 21160 to 195 mg/L with a rate of 4427.8 mg/L/d. Cu2+ and Fe was removed by biologically generated S2- and OH- from 360 and 6520 to 0.049 mg/L and less than 10 mg/L respectively. The average COD, copper and iron removal rate was 2523.2, 15.21 and 274.98 mg/L/d separately. The effluent pH reached 6.0-7.0. The results showed potential usage of this bioreactor in treating Acid Mine Drainage.


2010 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 269-270
Author(s):  
E. Botes ◽  
R. Jordan ◽  
M.F. deFlaun ◽  
J. Howell ◽  
R. Borch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document