Laser Acupuncture before Heel Lancing for Pain Management in Healthy Term Newborns: A Randomised Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslihan Abbasoglu ◽  
Mehmet Tugrul Cabioglu ◽  
Ali Ulas Tugcu ◽  
Ece Yapakci ◽  
Mustafa Agah Tekindal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Laser Acupuncture ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Actual Weight ◽  
Term Newborns ◽  
Oral Sucrose ◽  
Pharmacological Method ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background Healthy term newborns commonly undergo painful procedures during routine follow-up visits. Non-pharmacological strategies have currently become more important than pharmacological analgesic agents in neonatal pain management. Acupuncture is a new non-pharmacological method for preventing pain in newborns. Objective We aimed to investigate the effect of laser acupuncture (LA) at the Yintang point before heel lancing as a non-pharmacological intervention for procedural pain management in infants. Methods Forty-two term newborns, who were undergoing heel lancing between postnatal days 3 to 8 as part of routine neonatal screening, were randomly assigned to the LA group or the oral sucrose group. In the LA group, 2 min before the heel lancing, 0.3 J of energy was applied to the Yintang point using a Laser PREMIO-30 unit for 30 s. In the sucrose group, each infant received 0.5 mL of 24% sucrose orally via syringe 2 min before the heel lancing. Each baby's behaviour was scored using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS), assessed blinded to group. Results There were no significant differences between the LA and oral sucrose groups with respect to means for gestational week of age at birth, birth weight, actual weight, or Apgar score. Mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the LA group; however, mean crying time was longer and NIPS score was lower compared to the oral sucrose group. Conclusions Our results indicate that 0.3 J of LA at the Yintang point before heel lancing is less effective than oral sucrose for reducing the discomfort of this procedure. Trial Registration Number KA14/09.

Using feeding to reduce pain during vaccination of formula-fed infants: a randomised controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (12) ◽  
pp. 1132-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Netty G P Bos-Veneman ◽  
Marrit Otter ◽  
Sijmen A Reijneveld
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Formula Feeding ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
The Face ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness and potential side effects of formula feeding to reduce pain during vaccination among infants.Study designIn the setting of well-baby clinics we recruited a community-based sample of full-term born infants who were already formula fed by the choice of the parents (n=48, aged 4–10 weeks) and received their first DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib and pneumococcal vaccinations and randomised them into two groups. To evaluate pain experienced during vaccination we compared infants who drank formula feeding before, during and after vaccination with infants who did not. Outcomes were observed cry duration and pain scores measured by means of the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale. Side effects of drinking during vaccination were recorded. We performed intention-to-treat analyses using regression models, crude and adjusted for sex and age of the infant.ResultsPain at the moment of the second injection did not differ between groups. Drinking infants cried 33.5 s shorter (−56.6; −10.3). In the first minute after injection drinking infants experienced a faster pain reduction on the NIPSΔt: regression coefficient 3.86 (95% CI 2.70 to 5.02) and FLACCΔt: 4.42 (95% CI 2.85 to 5.99).ConclusionsIn line with findings of previous studies regarding breast feeding, formula feeding reduced vaccination pain in the recovery phase in full-term born infants receiving their first vaccinations between ages 4 and 10 weeks with no adverse effects. Professionals should discuss this non-costly and feasible pain-reducing intervention with parents of infants who receive vaccinations.Trial registration numberIRCTN 31383, post-results

scholarly journals Impact of audit and feedback with action implementation toolbox on improving ICU pain management: cluster-randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
pp. bmjqs-2019-009588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-José Roos-Blom ◽  
Wouter T Gude ◽  
Evert de Jonge ◽  
Jan Jaap Spijkstra ◽  
Sabine N van der Veer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Outcome Indicators ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Adequate Pain Management

BackgroundAudit and feedback (A&F) enjoys widespread use, but often achieves only marginal improvements in care. Providing recipients of A&F with suggested actions to overcome barriers (action implementation toolbox) may increase effectiveness.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of adding an action implementation toolbox to an electronic A&F intervention targeting quality of pain management in intensive care units (ICUs).Trial designTwo-armed cluster-randomised controlled trial. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by a researcher, unaffiliated with the study. Investigators were not blinded to the group assignment of an ICU.ParticipantsTwenty-one Dutch ICUs and patients eligible for pain measurement.InterventionsFeedback-only versus feedback with action implementation toolbox.OutcomeProportion of patient-shift observations where pain management was adequate; composed by two process (measuring pain at least once per patient in each shift; re-measuring unacceptable pain scores within 1 hour) and two outcome indicators (acceptable pain scores; unacceptable pain scores normalised within 1 hour).Results21 ICUs (feedback-only n=11; feedback-with-toolbox n=10) with a total of 253 530 patient-shift observations were analysed. We found absolute improvement on adequate pain management in the feedback-with-toolbox group (14.8%; 95% CI 14.0% to 15.5%) and the feedback-only group (4.8%; 95% CI 4.2% to 5.5%). Improvement was limited to the two process indicators. The feedback-with-toolbox group achieved larger effects than the feedback-only group both on the composite adequate pain management (p<0.05) and on measuring pain each shift (p<0.001). No important adverse effects have occurred.ConclusionFeedback with toolbox improved the number of shifts where patients received adequate pain management compared with feedback alone, but only in process and not outcome indicators.Trial registration numberNCT02922101.

scholarly journals Continuous Fentanyl Background Infusion Regimen Optimised by Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Randomised Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihoon Hwang ◽  
Sang Kee Min ◽  
Yun Jeong Chae ◽  
Gang Mee Lim ◽  
Han Bum Joe
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Patient Controlled Analgesia ◽  
Acute Postoperative Pain ◽  
Background Infusion ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Owing to a lack of studies investigating the effect of adjustments in fentanyl background infusion (BI) with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative analgesia, we evaluated three BI regimens with fentanyl PCA for acute postoperative pain management. This randomised controlled trial enrolled 105 patients, who were assigned to three parallel groups: constant rate BI of 2 mL/h (CRBI group); time-scheduled decremental BI of 6, 2 and 1 mL/h (TDBI group); and BI rates optimised to the demand of PCA (POBI group). The incidence of insufficient analgesia, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and side effects were evaluated. The incidence of insufficient analgesia in the post-anaesthesia care unit was lower in the TDBI and POBI groups than the CRBI group. Incidence of insufficient analgesia in the ward was lower in the POBI group than the CRBI group. Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower in the TDBI and POBI groups for up to 4 h and 24 h, respectively, compared with the CRBI group. Side effects and infused fentanyl dose were highest in the CRBI group. Adjusting BI rate based on time or patient demands could improve postoperative analgesia and reduce side effects. Compared to a constant BI rate, PCA-optimised BI achieved higher patient satisfaction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document