scholarly journals AB0732 THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERIODONTAL DISEASE AND RISK OF ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Author(s):  
Patompong Ungprasert ◽  
Karn Wijarnpreecha ◽  
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1652.1-1652
Author(s):  
A. Pandey ◽  
V. Ravindran ◽  
M. Pandey ◽  
R. Rajak ◽  
V. Pandey

Background:A close association between periodontal disease and Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has long been specualted. Both diseases are characterized by dysregulation of the host inflammatory response, leading to further destruction of soft and hard connective tissue with there being evidence of increased levels of TNF-α and various interleukins in both patients of AS and periodontitis.Objectives:The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the available literature exploring the relationship between AS and periodontal disease.Methods:We searched Medline & Embase databases (from their inception till October 2019) using appropriate combinations of following search items with limits ‘(English, Human)’; Ankylosing spondylitis, spondyloarthritis, spondyloarthropathies, spondyloarthritides, spinal disease, musculoskeletal disease, Rheumatic disease AND periodontitis, periodontal disease, periodontoses, parodontoses, chronic periodontitis, gum disease, gingivitis, oral health, dental health, plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment loss. This search was supplemented by the manual search of bibliographies of articles selected and conferences proceedings of EULAR. Only be reviews, observational study of cross-sectional, cohort or case control type on adult patients with AS were selected. Data was extracted from a predesigned proforma. A close association between periodontal disease and Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has long been specualted. Both diseases are characterized by dysregulation of the host inflammatory response, leading to further destruction of soft and hard connective tissue with there being evidence of increased levels of TNF-α and various interleukins in both patients of AS and periodontitis.Results:A total number of 984 articles were identified and 12 were selcted for detailed appraisal (Figure 1, PRISMA flow chart). They were all case control studies. The prevalence of periodontitis ranged from 38% to 88% in patients with AS whereas in the control group from 26% to 71 % in controls. Out of 12 studies, two showed significant changes in Plaque Index (PI), two studies showed altered Pocket Probing Depth (PPD), three showed significant increased in Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL) and increased Bleeding On Probing (BOP) was seen in 2 studies. In 7 studies, periodontitis was seen in a significant number of patients with AS (P<0.05). All studies reported that the prevalence of periodontal disease in AS patients was higher as compared to non-AS patients.Conclusion:Our systematic review found an association between AS and periodontal disease. Patients with AS show higher prevalence of periodontitis and a poor oral hygiene as compared to healthy controls. At practice level, this systematic review underscores the need for a collaboration between dentists and rheumatologist.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 1474-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadeel M. Abbood ◽  
Juliane Hinz ◽  
George Cherukara ◽  
Tatiana V. Macfarlane

Author(s):  
Rubelisa Cândido Gomes de Oliveira ◽  
Camila Alves Costa ◽  
Nádia Lago Costa ◽  
Gabriela Camilo Silva ◽  
João Antônio Chaves de Souza

Author(s):  
Sonia Nath ◽  
Brianna Poirier ◽  
Xiangqun Ju ◽  
Kostas Kapellas ◽  
Dandara Haag ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. E9
Author(s):  
Vaidya Govindarajan ◽  
Jean-Paul Bryant ◽  
Roberto J. Perez-Roman ◽  
Michael Y. Wang

OBJECTIVE Cervical fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis can have devastating neurological consequences. Currently, several surgical approaches are commonly used to treat these fractures: anterior, posterior, and anterior-posterior. The relative rarity of these fractures has limited the ability of surgeons to objectively determine the merits of each. The authors present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the utility of anterior surgical approaches relative to posterior and anterior-posterior approaches. METHODS After a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, 7 clinical studies were included in the final qualitative and 6 in the final quantitative analyses. Of these studies, 6 compared anterior approaches with anterior-posterior and posterior approaches, while 1 investigated only an anterior approach. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated where appropriate. RESULTS A meta-analysis of postoperative neurological improvement revealed no statistically significant differences in gross rates of neurological improvement between anterior and posterior approaches (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.10–1.59; p = 0.19). However, when analyzing the mean change in neurological function, patients who underwent anterior approaches had a significantly lower mean change in postoperative neurological function relative to patients who underwent posterior approaches (mean difference [MD] −0.60, 95% CI −0.76 to −0.45; p < 0.00001). An identical trend was seen between anterior and anterior-posterior approaches; there were no statistically significant differences in gross rates of neurological improvement (OR 3.05, 95% CI 0.84–11.15; p = 0.09). However, patients who underwent anterior approaches experienced a lower mean change in neurological function relative to anterior-posterior approaches (MD −0.46, 95% CI −0.60 to −0.32; p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in complication rates between anterior approaches, posterior approaches, or anterior-posterior approaches, although complication rates trended lower in patients who underwent anterior approaches. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review and meta-analysis demonstrated the varying benefits of anterior approaches relative to posterior and anterior-posterior approaches in treatment of cervical fractures associated with ankylosing spondylitis. While reports demonstrated lower degrees of neurological improvement in anterior approaches, they may benefit patients with less-severe injuries if lower complication rates are desired.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 911-924
Author(s):  
Zhenyu Li ◽  
Ting Fu ◽  
Yilin Wang ◽  
Chen Dong ◽  
Xiaoyi Shao ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2696
Author(s):  
Gloria Gonzalez-Medina ◽  
Veronica Perez-Cabezas ◽  
Antonio-Jesus Marin-Paz ◽  
Alejandro Galán-Mercant ◽  
Carmen Ruiz-Molinero ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to determine the role of global postural reeducation for people with ankylosing spondylitis. We compared the effects of treatments on pain, dysfunction (using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index), range of motion, and chest expansion in a specific population aged over 18 years old with ankylosing spondylitis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statements. The search was conducted using the PubMed, Physiotherapy Database (PEDro), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Web of Science (WoS) databases. Clinical trials and systematic reviews/meta-analysis were reviewed. Results: 154 studies were found. Finally, four were included. Conclusions: global postural reeducation is beneficial for ankylosing spondylitis, but no more so than other conventional treatments, except for spinal mobility, where Global Postural Reeducation demonstrated an advantage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document