Periodontal disease inequities among Indigenous populations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author(s):  
Sonia Nath ◽  
Brianna Poirier ◽  
Xiangqun Ju ◽  
Kostas Kapellas ◽  
Dandara Haag ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Nath ◽  
Brianna Poirier ◽  
Xiangqun Ju ◽  
Kostas Kapellas ◽  
Dandara Haag ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Indigenous populations globally experience worse health than their non-Indigenous counterparts. This includes oral health inequities, especially periodontal disease. Globally, the occurrence of periodontal disease such as gingivitis and chronic periodontitis are high among Indigenous people. This population encounters various barriers to accessing dental care as well as social and economic disadvantages, which results in higher disease burden compared to the general population. The aim of this systematic review is to quantify at a global level, the prevalence of periodontal disease among Indigenous populations compared to non-Indigenous populations.Methods: An electronic search will be conducted using keywords and appropriate MeSH terms across several databases capturing both published and unpublished articles. The search will be conducted from the time of database inception to February 2021. After the initial search, duplicates will be removed, and remaining titles and abstracts will be assessed for eligibility. This review will consider studies that have reported prevalence of periodontal disease among Indigenous and compared against non-Indigenous populations. Studies that have no comparative population or lack of periodontal clinical assessment will be excluded. The full text of eligible studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers who will also complete the critical appraisals and data extraction. From the selected studies, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis of observational data. Forest plots will be used for visualization of pooled prevalence of periodontitis. A subgroup analysis will be conducted based on definition of periodontitis, age, and geographical location. Heterogeneity among studies will be assessed by I2 and chi-square test. Egger’s test and funnel plots will be used to assess publication bias.Discussion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis will facilitate increased understanding of the magnitude of periodontal disease inequalities that exist globally for Indigenous populations through pooled prevalence estimates. The findings will be helpful to design selective targeted preventive and interventional strategies for periodontal disease for reducing oral health inequalities at a global level. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020188531


2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 1474-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadeel M. Abbood ◽  
Juliane Hinz ◽  
George Cherukara ◽  
Tatiana V. Macfarlane

Author(s):  
Rubelisa Cândido Gomes de Oliveira ◽  
Camila Alves Costa ◽  
Nádia Lago Costa ◽  
Gabriela Camilo Silva ◽  
João Antônio Chaves de Souza

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Evelin Alves ◽  
Ole Røgeberg ◽  
Svenn-Erik Mamelund

Abstract Background: Several studies have documented that indigenous groups have been disproportionally hit by previous pandemics, with some exceptions. The objective of this review and meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive historical overview of pre-COVID impact of influenza on indigenous groups by combining data from the last five influenza pandemics and seasonal influenza up to date. Methods/Principle Findings: The review will include peer-reviewed original studies published in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Swedish, Danish and Norwegian. Records will be identified through systematic literature search in eight databases: Embase, Medline, Cinahl, Web of Science, Academic Search Ultimate, SocIndex, ASSIA and Google Scholar. Results will be summarized narratively and using meta-analytic strategies. Discussion: To our knowledge, there is no systematic review combining historical data on the impact of both seasonal and pandemic influenza on indigenous populations. By summarizing results across indigenous groups in different countries and historical periods, we aim to provide information on how strong the risk for influenza is among indigenous people, and how consistent this risk is across groups, areas and time. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021246391


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 104226
Author(s):  
Juliana Simeão Borges ◽  
Luiz Renato Paranhos ◽  
Gabriela Leite de Souza ◽  
Felipe de Souza Matos ◽  
Ítalo de Macedo Bernardino ◽  
...  

Odontology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Corbella ◽  
Silvio Taschieri ◽  
Luca Francetti ◽  
Francesca De Siena ◽  
Massimo Del Fabbro

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0009890
Author(s):  
Beth Gilmour ◽  
Kefyalew Addis Alene ◽  
Archie C. A. Clements

Introduction Soil transmitted helminth (STH) infections cause one of the most prevalent diseases in man. STHs disproportionately impact socio-economically disadvantaged communities including minority indigenous populations. This systematic review aimed to quantify the prevalence of STH infection within minority indigenous populations of the South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions. Methods The systematic review was conducted in accordance with The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines following a published protocol. A random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of STH infection, and meta-regression analysis was used to quantify associations with study characteristics. Where comparative data were available, sub-group analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk of STH infection in minority indigenous people relative to other population groups. The heterogeneity between studies was evaluated visually using Forest plots and was assessed quantitatively by the index of heterogeneity (I2) and Cochran Q-statistics. Results From 1,366 unique studies that were identified, 81 were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of infection within minority indigenous populations was 61.4% (95% CI 50.8, 71.4) for overall STH infection; 32.3% (95% CI 25.7, 39.3) for Ascaris.lumbricoides; 43.6% (95% CI 32.6, 54.8) for Trichuris.trichiura; 19.9% (95% CI 15.7, 24.5) for hookworm and 6.3% (95% CI 3.2, 10.2) for Strongyloides.stercoralis. A significant increase in T. trichiura prevalence was observed over time. The stratified analysis showed that the prevalence of infection for STH overall and for each STH species were not significantly different in minority indigenous participants compared to other populations groups. Conclusion The prevalence of STH infection is high within minority indigenous populations across countries at very different levels of socio-economic development. The increasing prevalence of T. trichiura calls for the implementation of more effective therapies and control strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa ◽  
Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes ◽  
Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes ◽  
Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos ◽  
Tatiana Prosini da Fonte ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document