scholarly journals AB0713 EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LASER THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1388.1-1388
Author(s):  
N. Zhuravleva ◽  
L. Karzakova ◽  
S. Kudryashov ◽  
E. Petrova

Background:Despite the fact that the introduction of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic medicines (bDMARDs) and the early start of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can effectively stop the inflammatory process in RA, a fairly large number of patients continue to experience joint pain [1]. It is assumed that in some cases, joint pain in patients with RA is not associated with the inflammation, so it requires consideration of the possibility of using alternative strategies for the treatment of RA.Objectives:The aim of the research is to study the effectiveness of laser therapy in the treatment of RA.Methods:114 patients with RA aged from 32 to 53 years have been monitored for 6 months. There were 82 women (71.9 %) and 32 men (28.1%) among them. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The first group of patients (57 people) received basic medical therapy with methotrexate 15 mg intramuscularly once a week and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAIDs) on demand. The dose of methotrexate was selected taking into account the disease activity index DAS 28. The second group of patients (57 people) received basic medical therapy with methotrexate 15 mg intramuscularly once a week and NSAIDs on demand. In addition, the cutaneous low-intensity laser irradiation of the joints was added along the projection of the joint gap in a pulse mode with a wavelength of 0.89 microns. The pulse frequency is 80-1500 Hz, the pulse power is 5 W, the exposure time in the field is 1-2 minutes and the total radiation time per session is no more than 10 minutes [2]. The course of treatment consisted of 10 procedures (the device “Milta F-8 RD”, Russia, Moscow). The course of laser therapy was repeated after 4 weeks. To assess clinical indicators, patients were examined using the SF-36 questionnaire before treatment and 6 months after the start of treatment.Results:The survey after 6 months revealed the significant decrease in the severity of pain on the VAS from the initial average indicator 4.5±0.2 to 3.69±0.2 points (p<0.01) and morning stiffness from 60±5 to 40.8±4 minutes (p<0.01). In the first group, the dynamics of clinical indicators were not statistically significant: the intensity of pain decreased from 4.6±0.2 to 4.2±0.3 points (p>0.05) and the duration of morning stiffness reduced from 62±7 to 58.6±6 minutes (p>0.05). In the second group the decrease in the need for NSAIDs was observed in 21 patients, while in the first group the same was observed only in 10 patients (px2 = 0.020).Conclusion:Laser therapy in the treatment of patients with RA enabled to decrease the frequency of the need for NSAIDs and reduce morning stiffness. We recommend using laser therapy in patients with RA at the second radiological stage as an addition to basic therapy.References:[1]Altawil R et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016; 68(8): 1061-1068.[2]Burger M et al. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017; 33(3): 184-197.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1357.1-1357
Author(s):  
S. M. Lao ◽  
J. Patel

Background:Reactive arthritis is a form of spondyloarthritis with aseptic joint involvement occurring after a gastrointestinal or urogenital infection. Most commonly associated with Chlamydia trachomatis, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia. Syphilis is an infection caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum and is not usually associated with reactive arthritis. Syphilis is a great imitator of other diseases due to its broad presentation including painless chancre, constitutional symptoms, adenopathy, rash, synovitis, neurological and ocular findings.Objectives:To discuss a patient who presented with symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but was later diagnosed with syphilis.Methods:31 year old male, former tobacco smoker, referred to Rheumatology for sudden onset joint pains, elevated anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), and elevated inflammatory markers. He reported pain in bilateral wrists, fingers, and right elbow for 6 weeks. Associated with 45 minutes of morning stiffness and new onset lower back pain without stiffness. He denied trauma, fever, chills, skin rash, dysuria, or diarrhea. Initiated trial naproxen 500mg twice a day only to have minimal relief. Patient is sexually active with men and was recently diagnosed with oropharyngeal gonorrhea treated with azithromycin 4 months prior. All other STI screening including syphilis, gonorrhea, HIV were negative at that time. Patient is on emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. He denied family history of immune mediated conditions. Exam was significant for mild synovitis of both wrists and bilateral 2nd metacarpophalangeal joints. Initial labs revealed weakly positive anti-CCP 21 (normal <20), sedimentation rate 64 (normal ESR 0-15 mm/hr), C-reactive protein 24 (normal CRP 0-10 mg/L), and negative RF, ANA, HLA B27. During a short trial of prednisone taper, there was temporary improvement in symptoms, however synovitis recurred upon completion. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg twice a day was started for possible RA and he was referred to Ophthalmology for baseline retinopathy screening. Incidentally, he developed right sided blurry vision 2 weeks after initiation of HCQ. He was diagnosed with panuveitis of the right eye with inflammation of the optic nerve head and prednisone 40mg daily was initiated for presumed ocular manifestation of RA. However, further workup of panuveitis revealed reactive Treponema pallidum antibody and RPR quantity 1:32. Prednisone was immediately discontinued and he was referred to the emergency department for possible neurosyphilis.Results:Lumbar puncture showed cerebral spinal fluid with 260 red blood cells, 1 white blood cell, 27mg/dL protein, 60mg/dL glucose, non reactive VDRL, reactive pallidum IgG antibody, and negative cultures. Meningitis and encephalitis panels were negative. Patient completed a 14 day course of IV penicillin G with complete remission of joint pain, visual symptoms, and normalization of anti-CCP, ESR, and CRP.Conclusion:This case highlights how syphilis may mimic signs and symptoms of RA including symmetrical small joint pain, morning stiffness, elevated inflammatory markers, and positive anti-CCP. Anti-CCP is >96% specific for RA but was a false positive in this patient. There have only been few reported cases noting positive anti-CCP with reactive arthritis. This is a rare case of reactive arthritis secondary to syphilis with resolution of symptoms upon treating the syphilis.References:[1]Carter JD. Treating reactive arthritis: insights for the clinician. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2010 Feb;2(1):45-54.[2]Cohen SE, Klausner JD, Engelman J, Philip S. Syphilis in the modern era: an update for physicians. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;27(4):705-22.[3]Singh Sangha M, Wright ML, Ciurtin C. Strongly positive anti-CCP antibodies in patients with sacroiliitis or reactive arthritis post-E. coli infection: A mini case-series based review. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;21(1):315-321.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


1983 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
K G Rothwell

The results of three double-blind, multicentre trials are reviewed to compare the efficacy of acetysalicylic acid (ASA) and a non-acetylated salicylate, choline magnesium trisalicylate (CMT), in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In each trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive comparable doses of salicylate as either ASA or CMT. Mean values for clinical indicators of rheumatoid arthritis (number of painful joints, articular index, number of swollen joints, swelling index, duration of morning stiffness) showed similar or greater improvement among groups of patients receiving CMT, compared to those receiving ASA. In addition, the incidence of gastro-intestinal side-effects was lower among patients receiving CMT.


Author(s):  
I V Octiaborskaya ◽  
V A Tashlykov ◽  
I B Belyaeva

In 120 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis evaluated psychosomatic relationships Anxiety and depressive disorders were found in 80 (66.2%) patients. There was a positive correlation relationship between the number of patients with anxiety and depressive disorders and values of activity index dAS 28, functional health assessment index НAq, disease duration and quantitative values of rheumatoid factor. Combination therapy with methotrexate and infliximab has obvious advantages over monotherapy with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and leads to significant clinical improvement, increase functional ability of joints, improve the quality of life and decreased fatigue and somatization depression.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1021.2-1021
Author(s):  
E. Zhilyaev ◽  
G. Lukina ◽  
E. Koltsova ◽  
E. Shmidt ◽  
K. Lytkina

Background:Some theoretical data suggest that the JAK-kinase blocker tofacitinib (TOFA) may have a direct analgesic effect.Objectives:to evaluate the clinical significance of the analgesic effect in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real clinical practice.Methods:Hypothesis being tested: the analgesic effect of TOFA may be manifested by a decrease in the ratio of subjective to objective indicators of arthritis activity.Data from RA patients receiving biologics (bDMARD) and/or TOFA and included in the MUAR register were analyzed. The tender joints count (TJC), the HAQ-DI functional ability index, and the RAPID3 disease activity index were considered as subjective estimates. The swollen joints count (SJC) and the level of CRP were treated as objective indicators. The estimation of quotients from the division of subjective indicators into objective ones in all combinations is made.Taking into account the observational nature of the study, we searched for confounders for each of these ratios. Comparison of the calculated indices during the treatment with various targeted DMARDs (tDMARDs) was made with an adjustment for the detected confounders.Results:the analysis included 944 treatment episodes in 832 patients, including 93 episodes of TOFA treatment. The average age was 55.3 ± 12.4 years, women - 698 (83.9%), seropositive for RF -672 (80.8%). The analysis of the adjusted values showed that the ratios of the TJC, HAQ-DI and RAPID3 to the SJC during the treatment with TOFA was significantly lower than with tDMARDs on average. There were no significant differences in the ratios of objective indicators to the CRP level (Table).Table.Ratios of objective and subjective indicators during the treatment with tofacitinib and with tDMARDs therapy in generalConclusion:the severity of subjective feelings and functional disorders in RA patients receiving TOFA may be less with the same level of objective signs of arthritis compared with bDMARDs.Disclosure of Interests:Evgeniy Zhilyaev Speakers bureau: Novartis, UCB, Pfizer, Biocad, Abbvie, MSD, Roche, Galina Lukina Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Abbvie, Biocad, MSD, Roche, Ekaterina Koltsova: None declared, Evgeniya Shmidt Speakers bureau: MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Karine Lytkina Speakers bureau: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, Abbvie, Biocad, MSD, Jonson&Jonson


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
May Nwe Lwin ◽  
Christopher Holroyd ◽  
Dinny Wallis ◽  
Saul Faust ◽  
Hans De Graaf ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Aims  The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for over 120,000 UK deaths. Those with chronic inflammatory conditions or receiving immunosuppressive medications are at higher risk of COVID-19 than the general population. As a result, rheumatology patients taking b- or ts-DMARDs were advised to shield. We planned to observe COVID-19 related symptoms and anxiety levels reported by rheumatology patients during the pandemic. Methods  From April 2020, 1,004 rheumatology patients from an advanced therapy database were invited to participate in the adult ImmunoCOVID study to collect daily symptoms (fever, cough, shortness of breath (SOB), sore throat, blocked nose, red-eye, headache, fatigue, joint pain, muscle pain, chills, nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting, loss of senses) and anxiety level using an online portal. Loss of senses were not recorded until week 7 as these were not officially recognized at the pandemic onset. Results  153 patients (rheumatoid arthritis, n = 75, psoriatic arthritis, n = 28, Axial spondyloarthropathy, n = 24, systemic lupus erythematosus, n = 2 and other connective tissue diseases, n = 24) consented and participated. By week 25, 142 patients remained. Among those, 36.57% (±6.09%) (average (±SD)) reported no symptoms over the 25 week period. The main symptoms reported were joint pain (mean=47.94%) followed by fatigue (27.17%). Few patients reported fever (0.94%), cough (8.34%), SOB (4.53%), or loss of senses (1.11%) with more symptoms reported during the first 8 weeks (April/May 2020) and another increase in September/October 2020. The anxiety score (pragmatic 10-point scale) mean (±SD) was 5.60 (±0.34) and remained elevated throughout the study though higher when lockdown began. Conclusion  During the first peak of SARS-CoV-2, the number of patients reporting COVID-19 symptoms appeared high and was associated with high levels of anxiety. As only a small number have been swab-tested, this may suggest that larger numbers of untested individuals have had COVID-19 with mild symptoms. Features of inflammatory rheumatic illnesses may mimic COVID-19 symptoms and create diagnostic difficulty (joint pain and fatigue) whilst anxiety may lead to over-reporting of symptoms in the absence of infection. The key symptoms of fever, cough and SOB were less common and may be most reliable. Disclosure  M. Lwin: None. C. Holroyd: None. D. Wallis: None. S. Faust: None. H. De Graaf: None. C.J. Edwards: Honoraria; Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Fresenius, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Biogen, Pfizer. P051 Table 1:patient reported symptoms and anxiety score from immunoCOVID studyWeek & (number of participants)Fever (%)Cough (%)SOB (%)Joint pain (%)Fatigue (%)Loss of senses (%)No symptoms (%)Tested (n)Test positive (n)Anxiety score1 (26)3.857.6911.5446.1530.77NA30.77006.312 (42)2.3311.639.3052.3834.88NA28.57005.833 (69)1.4514.494.3552.1737.68NA23.19415.884 (92)1.0911.966.5254.3531.52NA27.17206.225 (110)0.0011.716.3145.9533.33NA30.00006.156 (108)0.0010.193.7050.0026.85NA34.26205.747 (119)0.8410.084.2049.5828.57NA34.45205.938 (120)0.007.505.0051.6734.170.8329.17305.629 (124)0.817.263.2352.4229.840.8136.29405.6410 (118)0.008.473.3948.3129.660.8534.75205.2811 (116)0.858.476.7849.1529.661.6933.62305.6512 (131)0.006.114.5856.4926.720.7635.11205.4513 (110)0.916.362.7350.0029.091.8242.73105.4414 (121)0.837.442.4847.1125.620.8339.67805.2815 (100)1.007.003.0046.0023.001.0041.00405.4816 (114)0.887.893.5139.4725.441.7542.98905.2717 (105)0.008.573.8144.7622.860.9543.81425.1018 (107)0.006.543.7443.9319.630.9343.93405.3019 (99)0.005.052.0240.4019.191.0145.45505.0820 (110)0.914.552.7350.9124.550.9139.09NA0Missing data21 (106)0.946.602.8350.0020.750.9439.62405.2822 (104)2.889.626.7349.0430.770.9635.58305.5023 (106)1.897.553.7742.4526.420.9436.79805.8924 (108)0.938.332.7844.4422.220.9341.67605.6125 (94)1.067.454.2641.4915.962.1344.68605.49Average0.948.344.5347.9427.171.1136.575.60SD0.972.312.254.395.350.426.090.34Weekly data are the average of daily reported symptoms and anxiety levels.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1095.3-1096
Author(s):  
A. Karateev ◽  
A. Lila ◽  
E. Nasonov ◽  
V. Mazurov ◽  
D. Chakieva ◽  
...  

Background:JAK inhibitors block intracellular signaling pathways responsible for the synthesis of cytokines and mediators involved in the development of chronic pain and central sensitization (CS). This determines a very rapid clinical response to JAK inhibitors. However, it is not clear how the significant pain reduction in the first weeks of therapy is associated with the achievement of low rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity.Objectives:to assess the relationship between the early clinical response to tofacitinib and the decrease in RA activity after 3 and 6 months.Methods:Study group included 88 patients with RA, their age was 53±11,5, 79.3% of women, 89.8% of RF “+”, DAS28 5.2±1.2, receiving DMARDs (methotrexate 59.5% and leflunomide 19.8%), who were administered with tofacitinib 5 mg 2 times a day due to inefficacy or intolerance of biological DMARDs. There were assessed the pain severity using Brief pain inventory (BPI) questionnaire, the presence of neuropathic pain component (NPC) using PainDETECT questionnaire and signs of CS using Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) questionnaire at early time after tofacitinib administration, RA activity using DAS28 after 3 and 6 months.Results:The mean pain severity at baseline was 5.3±2.0 according to the visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10), 51.1% of patients had signs of central sensitization (CSI ≥ 40), 15.9% had NPC (PainDETECT ≥18). 7 days after tofacitinib intake there was statistically reliable reduction of pain severity – up to 4.1±1.8 (р<0.05) and CS – CSI from 40.4±13.5 to 36.5±12.5 (р=0.01). After 28 days, the effect was higher: the pain level (VAS) was 2.8±1.6 (p=0.000), PainDETECT decreased from 11.8±5.6 to 6.8±3.1 (p=0.000), CSI – to 31.6±13.9 (p=0.000). DAS28 after 3 and 6 months was 3.7±1.3 and 3.6±1.2. The number of patients with pain decrease of ≥50% after 28 days of therapy was 59.9%. Low RA activity after 3 months. (DAS28 ≤3.2) was achieved in 64.4% of patients. There was a clear correlation between the number of patients with significant pain reduction at 28 days and the number of patients with low RA activity after 3 and 6 months (rS=0.548, p=0.000; rS=0.790, p=0.000). Six patients withdrew from the study due to inefficacy or social reasons. There were no serious adverse reactions.Conclusion:The application of JAK inhibitor tofacitinib allows to reach a fast analgesic effect and reduce CS signs. An early clinical response to tofacitinib (pain relief) predicts a decrease in RA activity after 3 and 6 months of the therapy.Limitation: Open-label observatory study.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-219876
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Nasonov ◽  
Saeed Fatenejad ◽  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Mariana Ivanova ◽  
Elena Korneva ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsIn this 24-week multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneously administered OKZ 64 mg once every 2 weeks, OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks, or placebo plus MTX. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12. The secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage of subjects achieving Disease Activity Score 28-joint count based on C reactive protein <3.2, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 12, ACR50 response and Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤2.8 at week 24. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the study.ResultsA total of 428 patients were randomised. ACR20 responses were more frequent with OKZ every 2 weeks (63.6%) and OKZ every 4 weeks (70.4%) than placebo (25.9%) (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). There were significant differences in all secondary efficacy endpoints between OKZ-treated arms and placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported by more patients in the OKZ groups compared with placebo. Infections were the most common TESAEs. No subjects developed neutralising antidrug antibodies.ConclusionsTreatment with OKZ was associated with significant improvement in signs, symptoms and physical function of rheumatoid arthritis without discernible differences between the two regimens. Safety was as expected for this class of agents. Low immunogenicity was observed.Trial registration numberNCT02760368.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1879.2-1879
Author(s):  
A. M. Cabezas-Lucena ◽  
M. Morales-Águila ◽  
S. Manrique Arija ◽  
C. Fuego-Varela ◽  
L. Cano Garcia ◽  
...  

Background:Objectives:To describe the characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in dose reduction of biological therapy (BT) in clinical practice and identify possible factors associated with the time in dose reduction and verify the utility of REDOSER tool.Methods:Design:A retrospective, observational longitudinal study under conditions of clinical practice.Patients:RA in BT dose reduction between 2007- 2019 were selected. Inclusion criteria: RA according to ACR 2010 criteria which have been initiated BT dose reduction. Patients with BT are followed prospectively every 3-4 months in a specialized outpatient unit of BT dose reduction with a pre-established protocol for data collection and registered in a database.Variables: Primary:Time in reduction: was defined as the time in which patients maintained the BT optimization andRelapse at 12 and 24 months: percentage of patients who, after starting BT optimization, return to the previous or standard dose.Secondary variables:REDOSER:Appropriate, Doubtful and Inappropriate (If dose reduction was adequate according to the REDOSER tool applied retrospectively were evaluated). Other variables: Demographic, clinical-analytical: time of disease evolution, RF, anti CCP antibodies, Number of Tender Joints, Number of swollen joints, erosions, activity index (DAS28, SDAI, CDAI) and physical function (HAQ). Previous treatments.Statistical Analysis:descriptive, bivariate using x2 and T-Student among patients with and without relapse at 24 months and multivariate linear regression to identify independent variables associated with the time in BT dose reduction (DV: time in reduction).Results:59 patients with RA were included. Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the subjects. The average (SD) of optimization in months was 17.9 (17.7). Ten patients (16.9%) relapsed at 12 months and 16 (27.1%) at 24 months. The mean (SD) of DAS28 and SDAI of patients who relapsed at 24 months was higher compared to baseline DAS28 (2.3 [0.9] vs. 1.5 [0.8]; p = 0.015) and SDAI (7.8 [6.3] versus 3.3 [1.6]; p 0.05). These patients who relapsed at 24 months compared to patients who did not have more erosions at the start of BT (p = 0.004), longer duration of disease (p = 0.072) and greater baseline activity of DAS28 (p = 0.017), of SDAI (p = 0.030) and CDAI (p = 0.036). After simulating the REDOSER tool to all patients at the beginning of the OBT, 28 patients (56%) were “Appropriate”, 20 (40%) “Doubtful” and 2 (4%) “Inappropriate” of which they continue in OBT at the conclusion of study 22, 10 and 0, respectively (p = 0.020). In the multivariant analysis, the independent variables that are associated with time in dose reduction of BT were baseline DAS28 (β = -0.660, 95% CI[2.7-14.0]; p=0.014) and age (β=-0.800, 95% CI [0.8-0.0]; p=0.038).Conclusion:The majority of the patients with RA who initiate BT dose reduction maintain the optimization after 24 months. REDOSER can be useful in clinical practice to assess the BT optimization in patients with RA. A longer time in BT dose reduction was associated with lower values of DAS28 at the beginning and younger age of the patients.Figure 1:Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1144.2-1144
Author(s):  
N. Zehraoui ◽  
R. Benaziez.Boutaleb ◽  
H. Hafirassou ◽  
F. Mechid ◽  
N. Bahaz ◽  
...  

Background:Biological therapies have significantly improved the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These molecules are very effective, but are known for their specific risks, especially infectious. It depends on several factors including the type of molecule used.Objectives:The objective of our study is to compare the rate of infection in RA patients treated with rituximab and anti-TNFα.Methods:Prospective, observational, monocentric study. Were included RA patients (ACR / EULAR 2010 criteria) treated with rituximab and anti-TNFα (adalimumab, infliximab and Etanercept) after inadequate response to DMARDs.Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, association with methotrexate and corticosteroids were collected and compared for each group.The number, type and severity of the infections in both cases were noted.SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) was used for data analysis.Results:40 RA patients treated with rituximab and 31 patients who received anti-TNFα were included.Patient characteristics and Comparison of rate of infection in RA patients between the two groups are summarized in Table 1Table 1.ParametersRituximabAnti-TNFαpNumber of patients4031Average age (years)56,2846,060,01Sexratio0,140,110,7Average duration of evolution (years)15,8313,740,3Patients under corticosteroid (%)97,587,10,08Average corticosteroid dose6,415,480,3patients under methotrexate (%)37,545,20,5Diabetes (%)2016,10,7Patients with infection (%)32,551,60,1Number of infections18240,4Number of serious infections500,04Conclusion:The rate of infections in patients with RA treated with rituximab or anti-TNF was similar. However, the infections observed were more serious in patients with RA treated with rituximabReferences:[1]Fabiola Atzeni MD PhD and al. Infections and Biological Therapy in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases. IMAJ . VOL 18. march-APRIL 2016.[2]Huifeng Yun and al. Comparative Risk of Hospitalized Infection Associated with Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in Medicare. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY. Vol. 68, No. 1, January 2016, pp 56–66.[3]Manjari Lahiri and al. Risk of infection with biologic antirheumatic therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology (2015) 1-16.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document