scholarly journals POS1122 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF THE PROTECT CLINICAL TRIAL: PEGLOTICASE EFFICACY AND SAFETY IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 840.2-840
Author(s):  
A. Abdellatif ◽  
L. Zhao ◽  
P. M. Peloso ◽  
K. Cherny ◽  
B. Marder ◽  
...  

Background:The prevalence of gout is high in kidney transplant (KT) recipients (up to 13%), largely because of decreased kidney function and calcineurin inhibitor use.1 Residual chronic kidney disease (CKD) leading to decreased urate lowering therapy clearance and drug interactions make managing gout in KT recipients challenging. Studies show that successful treatment with pegloticase, a pegylated uricase, leads to marked reductions in serum uric acid (sUA)2 and a subsequent decrease in overall urate load and tophi burden.3 However, pegloticase use in solid organ transplant recipients has not been systematically studied or well-characterized in the literature.4,5Objectives:To examine the safety and efficacy of pegloticase in KT recipients with uncontrolled gout.Methods:This ongoing multicenter, open-label, efficacy and safety study of pegloticase in KT recipients (NCT04087720) included patients with uncontrolled gout sUA ≥7 mg/dL, urate lowering therapy [ULT] contraindication/inefficacy, and with either visible tophi, chronic gouty arthritis, or ≥2 flares in past year, who were KT recipients (KT >1 year prior), had a functioning graft (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥15 ml/min/1.73m2), and were on a stable immunosuppressant regimen. Pegloticase (8 mg infusion) was administered biweekly for 24 weeks (12 infusions) followed by a safety visit 30 days after the last infusion and 3-month post-treatment follow up visit. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients who were serum uric acid responders during Month 6 (sUA <6 mg/dL for ≥80% of time). Change from baseline (CFB) at 24 weeks was also evaluated for sUA, renal function, and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI, maximum = 3) and pain (maximum = 100).Results:Preliminary findings of this study included 15 patients (12 male, 53.5±11.0 years of age) with uncontrolled gout (6.2±6.0 years since diagnosis) who had received a donor kidney 15.1±6.6 years earlier. At the time of analysis, 5 patients had completed the 24-week treatment period and 8 remained on therapy (last visit sUA <0.1 mg/dL in 6 patients, 1 had sUA of 7.4 mg/dL, 1 only received first infusion), and 2 had discontinued treatment (sUA rise [n=1], COVID-19 concerns [n=1]). Of the 5 patients who completed 24 weeks of therapy, all met response criteria and sUA was below detection limits (CFB: -10.2±1.3 mg/dL, baseline [BL]: 10.2±1.3 mg/dL). Patients also had less pain (HAQ-pain CFB: -33.6±22.2, BL: 35.9±22.0; n=5) and disability (HAQ-DI CFB: -0.3±0.6, BL: 0.7±0.8; n=5) at 24 weeks compared to BL. eGFR remained stable during 24 week treatment (eGFR CFB: -0.2±6.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, BL: 40.9±14.4 ml/min/1.73 m2; n=5). Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio showed improvement at 24 weeks (CFB: -223±405 mg/g, BL: 664±870 mg/g; n=5). 80% of patients experienced an AE, and 4 SAEs (duodenal ulcer, cellulitis, dyspnea, skin bacterial infection) deemed unrelated to pegloticase were reported. AEs that occurred in >1 patient included gout flare, pyrexia, arthralgia, and nasal congestion. No anaphylaxis or infusion reactions occurred.Conclusion:Initial findings suggest that pegloticase therapy is effective at reducing sUA in most KT recipients while preserving renal function. Results suggest that in the setting of profound urate lowering with pegloticase in KT patients, eGFR remains stable and patients experience clinically beneficial reductions in pain and disability with an absence of unexpected safety findings.References:[1]Clive DM. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;May11(5):974-9.[2]Sundy JS, et al. JAMA 2011;306:711-720.[3]Mandell BF, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2018;20:286.[4]Freyne B. Transplant Proc 2018;50:4099-101.[5]Hershfield MS, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R63.Disclosure of Interests:Abdul Abdellatif Speakers bureau: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Lin Zhao Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Paul M. Peloso Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Katya Cherny Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Brad Marder Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, John Scandling Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Kenneth Saag Consultant of: Arthrosi, Atom Bioscience, Horizon, LG Pharma, Mallinkrodt, SOBI, Takeda, Grant/research support from: Horizon, SOBI, Shanton.

2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 3119-3120 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kanbay ◽  
A. Akcay ◽  
B. Huddam ◽  
C.A. Usluogullari ◽  
Z. Arat ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Zawiasa ◽  
M. Szklarek-Kubicka ◽  
J. Fijałkowska-Morawska ◽  
D. Nowak ◽  
J. Rysz ◽  
...  

Metabolism ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 154465
Author(s):  
Camilo G. Sotomayor ◽  
Sara Sokooti Oskooei ◽  
Nicolás I. Bustos ◽  
Ilja M. Nolte ◽  
António W. Gomes-Neto ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mineaki Kitamura ◽  
Yasushi Mochizuki ◽  
Tsuyoshi Matsuda ◽  
Yuta Mukae ◽  
Hiromi Nakanishi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Higher serum uric acid (UA) levels are associated with poorer renal prognosis. In kidney transplantation, both donors and recipients are diagnosed as having chronic kidney diseases (CKD) based on renal function; however, their UA levels slightly vary. Elucidating the differences in UA would help improve kidney prognosis, especially for recipients. Therefore, we investigated UA levels in kidney transplant recipients by comparing them to those in their donors. Methods In this retrospective cross-sectional survey, background information and blood examination results were collected from the donors just before donation and after transplantation in the donors and recipients. Associations between UA and sex estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated. Data were assessed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables; multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine which factors were associated with renal function before and after transplantation. Results Participant characteristics were as follows. The mean donor age (n = 45, 16 men and 29 women) was 55 ± 11 years, and the mean recipient age (n = 45, 25 men and 20 women) was 46 ± 16 years. Sex-related differences (UA levels in men were predominant) existed in the UA of donors before (P < 0.001) and after donation (P < 0.001). Conversely, there were no significant sex-related differences in the UA of recipients (P = 0.51); the mean standardized eGFRs were similar in donors and recipients after transplantation. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed donor UA only correlated with donor sex before donation (P = 0.008). After donation, donor UA was associated with donor sex (P = 0.006), eGFR (P < 0.001), and BMI (P = 0.02). Notably, the UA of recipients after transplantation was only associated with eGFR (P = 0.003). Conclusions Sex has less impact on UA in recipients than in donors. UA has a greater impact on renal prognosis in women than men, even at the same UA level. Therefore, attention should be given to UA levels in female recipients. These findings can be useful for determining patient prognosis following kidney transplantation in both donors and recipients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paschalis Paschos ◽  
Vasilios G. Athyros ◽  
Achilleas Tsimperidis ◽  
Anastasia Katsoula ◽  
Nikolaos Grammatikos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document