SOLID ORAL DOSAGE FORMS IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS - A COST SAVING INVESTIGATION

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  
pp. e3-e3
Author(s):  
A. Lajoinie ◽  
B. Kassai ◽  
D. Terry
2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e18.2-e19
Author(s):  
Anna Kinsella

AimMost paediatric formulations produced for children are generally liquids or powders for reconstitution. Palatability of liquid formulations is often cited as a barrier to medication adherence.1 An alternative to liquid formulations is the conventional solid oral dosage forms, such as tablets or capsules. However, another barrier faced by paediatric patients is the inability to swallow tablets.2 This presents a number of challenges for children with ALL, as treatment contains a phase of extended ‘maintenance’ therapy to prevent relapse. This involves taking oral chemotherapy daily, ± monthly chemotherapy injections, over 2 years for girls and 3 years for boys. Prior to 2014, paediatric oncology pharmacists would work with children refusing to take or struggling with their liquid medicines. It was a simple approach, where ‘tic-tacs®’ were used and swallowinSg these was practiced together. Through education sessions and informal discussions with nursing, medical and play therapists, a culture evolved in 2014 whereby medicine taking was not just the responsibility of pharmacy but of the wider team. Nursing and medical staff were actively involved identifying families that needed support with their medicines. Display boards were created advertising the option of tablets for different medicines and highlighting the different swallowing techniques. The play specialists became ‘Medicine Champions’ using novel approaches to provide children with the tools, confidence and ability to take tablets. Children who successfully mastered swallowing tablets were presented a ‘star award’ certificate for their achievement. Photographs of children with their certificates were displayed in the outpatient clinic.MethodPaediatric patients diagnosed with ALL between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively identified using chemotherapy prescriptions, patient’s medical notes and electronic patient medical records. Data collected included age at diagnosis, formulation choice initiated on and whether patients switched formulations during the course of their treatment. Children were excluded for the following reasons: if they had a history of swallowing difficulties/choking, if the child had learning difficulties or if the child was deceased.Results172 patients were diagnosed with ALL between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2017; 14 patients were excluded (13 deceased,1 learning difficulties). The percentage of children aged 3–12 years taking tablets in 2012 and 2013 was 41% (n=7) and 20% (n=2) respectively. This increased to 69% (n=11) in 2014, remained consistently above 60% in 2015/2016 and increased again to 76% (n=14) in 2017. Between 2014 and 2017, 100% of patient’s ≥ 6 years took their oral chemotherapy as tablets. Over 65% of all patients 0 – 18 years were taking liquids in 2012/2013. From 2014 to 2017 less than 50% of all patients each year were taking liquids. No patients were identified as switching back from tablets to liquid.ConclusionThis study supports an interdisciplinary approach to tablet taking. By bringing together different members of staff with the necessary knowledge, skills and experiences, we were able to provide families with the tools and confidence to support their child in mastering the technique of swallowing tablets, increasing the number of patients initiating on or transitioning to solid oral dosage forms by approximately 50%.ReferencesBaguley D, et al. Prescribing for children – taste and palatability affect adherence to antibiotics: a review. Arch Dis Childhood, 2012;97:293–7.Polaha J. Dalton WT III, Lancaster BM. Parental report of medication acceptance among youth: implications for everyday practice. South Med J. 2008;101:1106–1112.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 411
Author(s):  
Abdul Latif Ershad ◽  
Ali Rajabi-Siahboomi ◽  
Shahrzad Missaghi ◽  
Daniel Kirby ◽  
Afzal Rahman Mohammed

A lack of effective intervention in addressing patient non-adherence and the acceptability of solid oral dosage forms combined with the clinical consequences of swallowing problems in an ageing world population highlight the need for developing methods to study the swallowability of tablets. Due to the absence of suitable techniques, this study developed various in vitro analytical tools to assess physical properties governing the swallowing process of tablets by mimicking static and dynamic stages of time-independent oral transitioning events. Non-anatomical models with oral mucosa-mimicking surfaces were developed to assess the swallowability of tablets; an SLA 3D printed in vitro oral apparatus derived the coefficient of sliding friction and a friction sledge for a modified tensometer measured the shear adhesion profile. Film coat hydration and in vitro wettability was evaluated using a high-speed recording camera that provided quantitative measurements of micro-thickness changes, simulating static in vivo tablet–mucosa oral processing stages with artificial saliva. In order to ascertain the discriminatory power and validate the multianalytical framework, a range of commonly available tablet coating solutions and new compositions developed in our lab were comparatively evaluated according to a quantitative swallowability index that describes the mathematical relationship between the critical physical forces governing swallowability. This study showed that the absence of a film coat significantly impeded the ease of tablet gliding properties and formed chalky residues caused by immediate tablet surface erosion. Novel gelatin- and λ-carrageenan-based film coats exhibited an enhanced lubricity, lesser resistance to tangential motion, and reduced stickiness than polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)–PEG graft copolymer, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), and PVA-coated tablets; however, Opadry® EZ possessed the lowest friction–adhesion profile at 1.53 a.u., with the lowest work of adhesion profile at 1.28 J/mm2. For the first time, the in vitro analytical framework in this study provides a fast, cost-effective, and repeatable swallowability ranking method to screen the in vitro swallowability of solid oral medicines in an effort to aid formulators and the pharmaceutical industry to develop easy-to-swallow formulations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor E. Shohin ◽  
Julia I. Kulinich ◽  
Galina V. Ramenskaya ◽  
Bertil Abrahamsson ◽  
Sabine Kopp ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 499-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Strauch ◽  
Jennifer B. Dressman ◽  
Vinod P. Shah ◽  
Sabine Kopp ◽  
James E. Polli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document