scholarly journals Treatment abandonment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in China: a retrospective cohort study of the Chinese Children’s Cancer Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 522-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaoyang Cai ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Xiaofan Zhu ◽  
Shaoyan Hu ◽  
Yiping Zhu ◽  
...  

ObjectivesBefore 2003, most children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) abandoned treatment, with only approximately 30% treated in China. With the development of national insurance for underprivileged patients, we assessed the current frequency and causes of treatment abandonment among patients with ALL who were enrolled in the Chinese Children’s Cancer Group ALL protocol between 2015 and 2016.MethodsDemographic, clinical and laboratory data on patients who abandoned treatment, as well as economic and sociocultural data of their families were collected and analysed. General health-related statistics were retrieved from publicly accessible databanks maintained by the Chinese government.ResultsAt a median follow-up of 119 weeks, 83 (3.1%, 95% CI 2.5% to 3.8%) of the 2641 patients abandoned treatment. Factors independently associated with abandonment included standard/high-risk ALL (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.43 to 4.77), presence of minimal residual disease at the end of remission induction (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.90 to 6.74) and low-income economic region (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.89 to 7.05). According to the family members, economic constraints (50.6%, p=0.0001) were the main reason for treatment abandonment, followed by the belief of incurability, severe side effects and concern over late complications.ConclusionsThe rate of ALL treatment abandonment has been greatly reduced in China. Standard/high-risk ALL, residence in a low-income region and economic difficulties were associated with treatment abandonment.Clinical trial registration numberChiCTR-IPR-14005706, pre-results.

The Lancet ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 329 (8536) ◽  
pp. 786-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
RogerH. Herzig ◽  
A. John Barrett ◽  
Eliane Gluckman ◽  
StevenJ. Jacobsen ◽  
Tohru Masaoka ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e2015041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Parma ◽  
Clara Vigano' ◽  
Monica Fumagalli ◽  
Federica Colnaghi ◽  
Arianna Colombo ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) carrying t(9;22) or t(4;11) genetic abnormalities represents a very high risk subtype of disease (VHR-ALL). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) still remains the only curative option also in the Imatinib era. In the last years low molecular level of minimal residual disease (MRD) before HSCT was reported as one of the best favourable indexes for survival in ALL. Here we observed that even these patients can show a favourable outcome, if submitted to HSCT with very low MRD. Methods: We considered 18 consecutive VHR-ALL patients eligible to HSCT. 16 of them were transplanted upon first remission, as soon as possible, employing myelo-ablative conditioning regimens. Molecular MRD has been evaluated before and after HSCT.Results: Immediately before HSCT MRD revealed: complete molecular remission (MRDneg) for 5 patients and a level <1x10-3 for 7 patients; 100 days after HSCT we had: MRDneg for 7 patients and a decrease for all the others after HSCT. After tapering of immunosuppressive drugs, 13 patients reached the MRDneg in a median time of 8 months (range 3-16); Based on intention to treat analysis: 14/18 patients are alive and disease free at the time of analysis, overall survival and event free survival is of 78% and 66% respectively, with an average follow-up of 45 months (range 6-84) since HSCT. Conclusion: Early transplantation with low MRD level seems to be correlated with a favourable outcome also in VHR-ALL


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3773-3773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Schwab ◽  
Rebecca Andrews ◽  
Lucy Chilton ◽  
Alannah Elliott ◽  
Stacey Richardson ◽  
...  

Abstract BCR-ABL1-like acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a subgroup of B cell precursor (BCP) ALL, which has a similar gene expression profile to BCR-ABL1 positive ALL and shares the same high risk of relapse. BCR-ABL1-like ALL is genetically heterogeneous and no single abnormality defines them. However a number of novel fusion genes have been reported in this subgroup, which involve the kinase genes: PDGFRB, CSF1R, ABL1, ABL2 and JAK2. Studies have shown that patients with these fusions may also respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as imatinib. Here we present a subset of patients with the SSBP2-CSF1R fusion, including a patient treated with imatinib after relapse. Five patients with BCP-ALL were identified with cytogenetically visible abnormalities of chromosome 5, which resulted in fusion of the SSBP2 at 5q14 to CSF1R at 5q33. Three patients showed balanced translocations, t(5;5)(q14;q33) and 2 showed duplication of the long arm of chromosome 5, dup(5)(q14q33). FISH analysis using in-house dual colour break-apart probes confirmed rearrangement of the CSF1R and SSBP2 genes in 4 patients. In the two cases showing dup(5)(q14q32) the duplication was confirmed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis with the breakpoints occurring within SSBP2 and CSF1R. Paired end sequencing in 3 cases confirmed that the breakpoints within SSBP2 and CSF1R with the predicted transcriptional consequence being an in-frame fusion of SSBP2 exon 5 or 6 to CSF1Rexon 12. Genome wide SNP array analysis was performed in 4 cases, which revealed few copy number abnormalities (CNA) at diagnosis, with less than 5 CNA per patient. The only recurrent CNA was loss of IKZF1, seen in 2 patients; one had an intragenic deletion of exons 4-7 and the other a large deletion of approximately 22.5 Mb, spanning 7p11 to 7p14.2 and including biallelic loss of IKZF1exons 2-3. The clinical and demographic data for the five patients are shown in Table 1. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in all cases. Two patients, who were <10 years at diagnosis and received standard chemotherapy, have continued in CR1 for >10 years. The oldest patient was a 40 year old female who died due to graft versus host disease following a bone marrow transplant. Patients 4 and 5 were treated as high risk due to age, high WCC (>50 x109/L) and minimal residual disease (MRD) risk. Despite receiving intensive therapy, both patients suffered relapses. Patient 4, who relapsed while receiving consolidation therapy, failed to achieve CR2 and subsequently died. Patient 5 suffered an isolated bone marrow relapse one month after the end of treatment. She was treated according to the ALLR3 trial high risk arm and achieved CR2 and MRD negativity by day 35. The detection of the SSBP2-CSF1R fusion prompted the addition of imatinib (400 mg/d) to her regimen with the intention of maintaining remission until unrelated donor stem cell transplant. Unfortunately the patient died 11 weeks after relapse from infection (E. coli septicaemia). Although these cases were identified by cytogenetics, unbiased screening of a single childhood trial, UKALL2003 was carried out. Among 276 BCP-ALL patients without any of the established cytogenetic changes, a single case (Patient 4) with the SSBP2-CSF1Rfusion was identified. This equates to less than 0.1% of childhood BCP-ALL. The incidence and outcome in adult BCP-ALL remains to be determined. This study highlights the rarity and variable outcome for paediatric patients with SSBP2-CSF1R fusions. Two young children treated as low risk achieved long-term event free survival, however 2 older children classified as high risk suffered early relapses. It is possible that children with ALL who are SSBP2-CSF1Rpositive may benefit from the incorporation of TKI into their treatment regime in the early stages of their disease. Given the rarity of this abnormality, it may not be necessary to screen all children, however those with refractory or high risk ALL should be investigated for lesions potentially responsive to TKI. Table 1 Patient no. Age Sex Trial WCC(x109/L) Karyotype Follow up 1 2 M ALL97 50.3 46,XY,t(5;5)(q14q33) CR1 >10yrs 2 4 F ALL97 18.2 47,XX,t(5;5)(q14;q33),+21 CR1 >10yrs 3 40 F UKALLXII 12.1 Failed. arr [hg19] 5q14q33(80721553-149443298)x3 Remission death 4 10 M UKALL2003 301.8 46,XY,t(5;5)(q14;q33)/46,XY,idem,t(3;20)(p21;q13) Relapsed and died 5 11 F Non-trial 8 46,XX,dup(5)(q14q33)† Relapsed and died in CR2 † karyotype at relapse Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document