scholarly journals P41 Pharmacokinetics-based estimation of evolocumab dosing for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) in patients aged 6 to 12 years old

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e27.3-e28
Author(s):  
Chris Paget ◽  
Adam Sutherland

BackgroundHomozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterised by high plasma cholesterol levels and premature development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.1Evolocumab is a high-cost monoclonal antibody to PCSK-9, an enzyme critical in cholesterol homeostasis. It is a subcutaneous injection commissioned for HoFH in children ≥12 years with persistently raised LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) despite maximal tolerated lipid-lowering therapy.2 3 There is an unmet clinical need to allow patients ≥6 years meeting the same treatment threshold to access evolocumab and attenuate progression to invasive lipid apheresis or liver transplantation. However, as there are no published studies with PCSK-9 inhibitors in children <12 years, no established dosing regimen exists.Aims and objectivesPropose a safe, efficacious and cost-effective dose of evolocumab to be administered to eligible patients aged 6 to 12 years old with HoFH.Review all patients at 12 weeks to determine if 30% target LDL-C reduction is achieved thereby warranting treatment continuation in line with commissioning criteria.Review all patients at 12 months to establish if LDL-C reduction sustained.Assess all patients for incidence and nature of treatment-related adverse effects.MethodProposed evolocumab dosing determined using four criteria: potential dosing adjustments required based on population physiological and pharmacokinetic data, drug safety profile, practicalities of administration and cost implications.Clinic letters for all patients were reviewed 12 weeks and 12 months after treatment commenced.ResultsIn children <12 years dosing was proposed to start at 140 mg every 2 weeks, as this is the lowest administrable dose but is clinically equivalent to the 420 mg monthly dose (if information is extrapolated from heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia studies4) and more cost-effective in terms of number of injections required. Furthermore, dose reduction in younger patients unlikely to be required as blood volume-dependent clearance of monoclonal antibodies and synthetic rates of PCSK-9 production do not significantly vary with age. Wide therapeutic index is implied as doses can be increased to 420 mg every 2 weeks and PCSK-9 has a limited physiological role with negligible ‘off target’ toxicity due to its inhibition.2 3 Therapeutic drug monitoring is not currently an option. Evolocumab was initiated using the proposed dose regimen in two eligible patients. Patient 1 had a 65% reduction in LDL-C (5.9 mmol/L to 1.9 mmol/L) at week 12, marginally subsiding at 12 months (2.7 mmol/L). No adverse effects reported and patient not yet progressed to lipid apheresis or liver transplantation. Patient 2 had only a 7% reduction in LDL-C (6.97 mmol/L to 6.48 mmol/L) at week 12 therefore evolocumab was stopped. No adverse effects were experienced. Lipid apheresis was continued throughout treatment.Conclusions and DiscussionExtrapolated dose of 140 mg every 2 weeks was safe and well-tolerated. Larger patient numbers are needed to further determine efficacy and safety, particularly due to promising significant and sustained LDL-C reduction in one patient. Licensed dose increases due to poor response in patients ≥12 years warrant investigation in younger population to allow potential treatment escalation for refractory patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring and antibody level testing are possible future research opportunities.ReferencesCuchel M, Bruckert E., Ginsberg HN, Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J, 2014;35:2146–57.Amgen Ltd., Summary of Product Characteristics for Repatha Sureclick. 2016. Available from www.medicines.org.uk [accessed: 24/05/2018]. Last updated 08/03/2018.NHS England, NHSE statement on evolocumab for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (circular). September 2016.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Evolocumab for treating primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia [TA394]. 2016. Available from www.nice.org.uk [accessed:22/06/2018].

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e58.2-e59
Author(s):  
A van der Veen ◽  
RJ Keizer ◽  
W de Boode ◽  
A Somers ◽  
R Brüggemann ◽  
...  

BackgroundVancomycin is commonly used for treatment of severe Gram+ neonatal infections. Currently, even with the use of optimized dosing regimens and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), target attainment rates are abominable, leaving patients at risk for therapeutic failure and toxicity. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) offers a large potential to improve therapy in the individual patient.The aim of this study was to identify a suitable model for bedside MIPD by assessing the predictive performance of published population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models.MethodsA literature search was conducted to identify parametric popPK models. PK vancomycin data were retrospectively collected from NICU patients at the Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. The model predictive performance was assessed by comparison of predictions to observations, calculation of bias (Mean Percentage Errors, MPE) and imprecision (Normalized Root Mean Squared Errors, NRMSE). Evaluations included both a priori (model covariate input) and a posteriori (model covariate and TDM concentration input) scenarios.Results265 TDM measurements from 65 neonates (median postmenstrual age:32 weeks [range:25–45 weeks]; median weight:1281g [range:597–5360g]; median serum creatinine:0,48 mg/dL [range:0,15–1,28 mg/dL]) were used for model evaluation. Six popPK models were evaluated1–6. A posteriori predictions of all models were consistently more accurate and precise compared to the a priori (starting dose) predictions. PopPK models of Frymoyer et al. and Capparelli et al. consistently performed best through all evaluations in both the a priori and a posteriori scenario (MPE ranging from -18 to 6,4% in a priori scenario and -6,5 to -3,8% in a posteriori scenario; NRMSE ranging from 34 to 40% in a priori scenario and 23 to 24% in a posteriori scenario).ConclusionLarge differences in predictive performance of popPK models were observed. Repeated therapeutic drug monitoring remains necessary to increase target attainment rate. Best performing models for bedside MIPD were identified in our patient population.ReferencesZhao W, Lopez E, Biran V, et al. ( 2013). Vancomycin continuous infusion in neonates: Dosing optimisation and therapeutic drug monitoring. Arch Dis Child;98(6):449–453.Capparelli EV, Lane JR, Romanowski GL, et al. ( 2001). The influences of renal function and maturation on vancomycin elimination in newborns and infants. J Clin Pharmacol, 41:927–934.De Cock RFW, Allegaert K, Brussee JM, et al. ( 2014). Simultaneous pharmacokinetic modeling of gentamicin, tobramycin and vancomycin clearance from neonates to adults: towards a semi-physiological function for maturation in glomerular filtration. Pharm Res;31(10):2642–2654.Frymoyer A, Hersh AL, El-Komy MH, et al. ( 2014). Association between vancomycin trough concentration and area under the concentration-time curve in neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 58(11):6454–6461.Anderson BJ, Allegaert K, Van Den Anker JN, Cossey V, Holford NHG. ( 2006). Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in preterm neonates and the prediction of adult clearance. Br J Clin Pharmacol;63(1):75–84.Germovsek E, Osborne L, Gunaratnam F, Lounis SA, Busquets FB, Sinha AK. ( 2019). Development and external evaluation of a population pharmacokinetic model for continuous and intermittent administration of vancomycin in neonates and infants using prospectively collected data. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1–9.Disclosure(s)R. Keizer is an employee and stockholder of InsightRX.


Author(s):  
Ahmed Ali ◽  
Mahran Abdel-Rahman

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a teamwork clinical pharmacokinetic services aimed to optimize pharmacotherapy of certain drugs such as those with a narrow therapeutic range, complicated pharmacokinetics. It involves the determination of drug level in blood samples taken at the appropriate time. Interpretation of results requires integration of pharmacokinetics, the pharmacodynamics of the drug and the patient’s clinical profile. To be cost-effective the service should be optimized. This review was written by experts from different developing countries to highlight the fundamentals of the service and provide suggestions for its optimization. These cover the rationale of requesting drug level, design of request form, optimal sampling, and analytical tools. guidelines for appropriate interpretation of drug levels; completeness of the roles of the qualified medical team; continuing education and skills development; involve the patients in improving the service, conducting relevant research; use PK software and integration of TDM with pharmacogenomics


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zanab Al-Roubaie ◽  
Elena Guadagno ◽  
Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar ◽  
Afsheen Q. Khan ◽  
Kenneth A. Myers

ObjectiveTo systematically review and evaluate the available evidence supporting or refuting clinical use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Cochrane, PubMed, Africa-Wide Information, Web of Science, and grey literature. Randomized controlled studies and observational studies that compared the clinical outcomes of TDM vs non-TDM were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. The primary outcome was seizure control; adverse effects were considered as secondary outcomes. The PROSPERO ID of this systematic review's protocol is CRD42018089925.ResultsSixteen studies were identified meeting eligibility requirements. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 meta-analysis, and 11 quasiexperimental (QE) studies were included in the systematic review. Results from the analysis of RCTs showed no significant positive effect of TDM on seizure outcome (only 25% positive effect of phenytoin). However, some of the QE studies found that TDM was associated with better seizure control or lower rates of adverse effects. The existing evidence from various designs has shown various methodological implications, which warrants inconclusive results and highlights the requirement of more number of studies in this line.ConclusionsIf optimally implemented, TDM may enhance clinical care, particularly for phenytoin and other AEDs with complex pharmacokinetics. However, the ideal method for implementation is unclear, and serum drug levels should be considered in context with patient-reported clinical data regarding seizure control and adverse events.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1538-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Braun ◽  
B Peters ◽  
E Schütz ◽  
T Lorf ◽  
N Undre ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document