Therapeutic drug monitoring: is it cost-effective?

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 619-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald E Schumacherand ◽  
Judith T Barr
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ali ◽  
Mahran Abdel-Rahman

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a teamwork clinical pharmacokinetic services aimed to optimize pharmacotherapy of certain drugs such as those with a narrow therapeutic range, complicated pharmacokinetics. It involves the determination of drug level in blood samples taken at the appropriate time. Interpretation of results requires integration of pharmacokinetics, the pharmacodynamics of the drug and the patient’s clinical profile. To be cost-effective the service should be optimized. This review was written by experts from different developing countries to highlight the fundamentals of the service and provide suggestions for its optimization. These cover the rationale of requesting drug level, design of request form, optimal sampling, and analytical tools. guidelines for appropriate interpretation of drug levels; completeness of the roles of the qualified medical team; continuing education and skills development; involve the patients in improving the service, conducting relevant research; use PK software and integration of TDM with pharmacogenomics


1989 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1782-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
F M Moore ◽  
D Simpson

Abstract Using Syva "EMIT" reagents and the Cobas Bio centrifugal analyzer, we have developed cost-effective assays for therapeutic drug monitoring of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin. With these optimized methods one can assay up to 2470 samples with a single 100-test EMIT kit with good precision and accuracy. Between-batch CVs, based on results of repeat analysis of routine patients' samples, were 4.6%, 7.0%, and 5.3%, respectively. Results correlated well with those by methods previously used [gas chromatography and fluorescence polarization (Abbott TDx)], but there was a negative bias (-10.9%) of our method for phenobarbital results in patients' samples, as compared with those obtained with the TDx.


Hypertension ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Chung ◽  
Klaus BONAVENTURA ◽  
Christian Sohns ◽  
Wilhelm Haverkamp ◽  
Wilhelm Haverkamp ◽  
...  

Background: Non-adherence to anti-hypertensive medications poses a significant problem in the treatment of patients with presumed resistant hypertension (RH). Our recent study has shown that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a useful tool not only for detecting medication non-adherence but also exploring the barrier to antihypertensive drug therapy, resulting effective BP control. However, the cost effectiveness of TDM in the management of resistant hypertension has not been investigated. Method: A Markov model was used to evaluate life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in RH patients receiving either TDM optimized therapy or standard best medical therapy (BMT). The model ran from the age of 30 to 100 years or death, using a cycle length of 1 year. Efficacy of TDM was modeled by reducing risk of hypertension-related morbidity and mortality. Results: In the age group of 60-year olds, TDM gained 1.07 QALYs in men and 0.97 QALYs in women at additional costs of є3,854 and є3,922, respectively. Given a willingness-to-pay threshold of є35,000 per QALY gained, the probability of TDM being cost-effective compared to BMT was ≥95% in all age groups from 30 to 90 years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were influenced mostly by the annual frequency of TDM testing, the rate of non-responders to TDM, and the magnitude of effect of TDM on systolic blood pressure (Figure). Conclusion: Therapeutic drug monitoring presents a potential cost-effective health care intervention in patients diagnosed with RH. Importantly, this finding is valid for a wide range of patients, independent of gender and age.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S445-S446
Author(s):  
J Doherty ◽  
R Varley ◽  
M Healy ◽  
C Dunne ◽  
F Mac Carthy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has not demonstrated improved therapy outcomes compared with clinically-based dosing strategies. While the use of proactive TDM incurs additional assay-related costs this strategy may be cost-effective due to TDM-driven therapy dose de-escalation and discontinuation. Methods We aimed to assess if proactive-TDM is cost-effective in clinical practice. A proactive TDM strategy was utilized in our unit with infliximab (IFX) and antibody-to-infliximab (ATI) levels assessed at trough in all inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) patients receiving IFX. Baseline demographics and IFX dosing schedules were documented. Patients were grouped based on disease activity status. Patients with IFX levels outside therapeutic range had dosing adjusted as appropriate. IFX dose adjustments were not protocolized and were at physicians discretion. IFX dosing regimens following proactive TDM were documented and net effect on IFX infusions number over the subsequent year extrapolated. Increase or decrease in drug-related costs on an annualized basis were estimated. Results 108 patients were included. Median age 36 years. 46% were female. 36% had ulcerative colitis, 60% Crohn’s disease. 35% were receiving concomitant immunomodulators. 56% were in remission at the time of TDM. 44%, 30% and 26% had IFX levels < 3 µg/mL, 3 – 7 µg/mL and > 7 µg/mL. IFX levels were significantly lower in patients with active disease compared with those in remission(p=0.008). Following proactive TDM assessment 37%, 11%, 36%, 13%, 2% and 1% of patients had no treatment change, therapy discontinuation, interval shortening, interval lengthening, dose increase and dose decrease respectively. Cost-effectiveness analysis focused on patients in remission (n=59). The use of proactive TDM-based IFX dosing resulted in a projected annualized reduction of 19.5 and 28.5 infusions due to IFX discontinuation and interval lengthening; the projected annualized increase in infusions was 39.1 and 4.3 due to IFX interval shortening and dose increase. This resulted in a net projected reduction of 4.7 IFX infusions per annum. Utilizing publicly available list prices for originator and biosimilar IFX and accounting for assay cost, projected cost savings resulting from proactive-TDM was 9105.0 and 6840.7 Euro per annum. Conclusion Proactive TDM in IBD patients in remission resulted in a modest reduction in the projected annualized number of infusions in our unit with consequent minor drug-related cost savings. Proactive-TDM encouraged cost-effective prescribing of IFX, however, the effect was minor. The frequency at which proactive TDM should be performed and whether subsequent rounds of proactive-TDM would continue to deliver similar cost savings is uncertain.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana M Negoescu ◽  
Eva A Enns ◽  
Brooke Swanhorst ◽  
Bonnie Baumgartner ◽  
James P Campbell ◽  
...  

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab is a marginally cost-effective strategy for Crohn’s disease, whereas reactive therapeutic drug monitoring is cost-effective. As the cost of infliximab decreases, a proactive strategy of dosing infliximab becomes more cost-effective.


2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e27.3-e28
Author(s):  
Chris Paget ◽  
Adam Sutherland

BackgroundHomozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterised by high plasma cholesterol levels and premature development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.1Evolocumab is a high-cost monoclonal antibody to PCSK-9, an enzyme critical in cholesterol homeostasis. It is a subcutaneous injection commissioned for HoFH in children ≥12 years with persistently raised LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) despite maximal tolerated lipid-lowering therapy.2 3 There is an unmet clinical need to allow patients ≥6 years meeting the same treatment threshold to access evolocumab and attenuate progression to invasive lipid apheresis or liver transplantation. However, as there are no published studies with PCSK-9 inhibitors in children <12 years, no established dosing regimen exists.Aims and objectivesPropose a safe, efficacious and cost-effective dose of evolocumab to be administered to eligible patients aged 6 to 12 years old with HoFH.Review all patients at 12 weeks to determine if 30% target LDL-C reduction is achieved thereby warranting treatment continuation in line with commissioning criteria.Review all patients at 12 months to establish if LDL-C reduction sustained.Assess all patients for incidence and nature of treatment-related adverse effects.MethodProposed evolocumab dosing determined using four criteria: potential dosing adjustments required based on population physiological and pharmacokinetic data, drug safety profile, practicalities of administration and cost implications.Clinic letters for all patients were reviewed 12 weeks and 12 months after treatment commenced.ResultsIn children <12 years dosing was proposed to start at 140 mg every 2 weeks, as this is the lowest administrable dose but is clinically equivalent to the 420 mg monthly dose (if information is extrapolated from heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia studies4) and more cost-effective in terms of number of injections required. Furthermore, dose reduction in younger patients unlikely to be required as blood volume-dependent clearance of monoclonal antibodies and synthetic rates of PCSK-9 production do not significantly vary with age. Wide therapeutic index is implied as doses can be increased to 420 mg every 2 weeks and PCSK-9 has a limited physiological role with negligible ‘off target’ toxicity due to its inhibition.2 3 Therapeutic drug monitoring is not currently an option. Evolocumab was initiated using the proposed dose regimen in two eligible patients. Patient 1 had a 65% reduction in LDL-C (5.9 mmol/L to 1.9 mmol/L) at week 12, marginally subsiding at 12 months (2.7 mmol/L). No adverse effects reported and patient not yet progressed to lipid apheresis or liver transplantation. Patient 2 had only a 7% reduction in LDL-C (6.97 mmol/L to 6.48 mmol/L) at week 12 therefore evolocumab was stopped. No adverse effects were experienced. Lipid apheresis was continued throughout treatment.Conclusions and DiscussionExtrapolated dose of 140 mg every 2 weeks was safe and well-tolerated. Larger patient numbers are needed to further determine efficacy and safety, particularly due to promising significant and sustained LDL-C reduction in one patient. Licensed dose increases due to poor response in patients ≥12 years warrant investigation in younger population to allow potential treatment escalation for refractory patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring and antibody level testing are possible future research opportunities.ReferencesCuchel M, Bruckert E., Ginsberg HN, Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J, 2014;35:2146–57.Amgen Ltd., Summary of Product Characteristics for Repatha Sureclick. 2016. Available from www.medicines.org.uk [accessed: 24/05/2018]. Last updated 08/03/2018.NHS England, NHSE statement on evolocumab for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (circular). September 2016.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Evolocumab for treating primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia [TA394]. 2016. Available from www.nice.org.uk [accessed:22/06/2018].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document