Using ‘smart regulation’ to tackle antimicrobial resistance in low-income and middle-income countries

SynopsisBackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance of bloodstream infections is challenging in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limited laboratory capacity preventing routine patient-level susceptibility testing. Other specimen types could provide an effective approach to surveillance.ObjectivesOur study aims to systematically evaluate the relationship between resistance prevalence in non-sterile sites and bloodstream infections.MethodsAssociations between resistance rates in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus isolates from blood and other specimens were estimated in Oxfordshire, UK, 1998-2018, comparing proportions resistant in each calendar year using time series cross-correlations and across drug-years. We repeated analysis across publicly-available data from four high-income and 12 middle-income countries, and in three hospitals/programmes in LMICs.Results8102 E. coli bloodstream infections, 322087 E. coli urinary tract infections, 6952 S. aureus bloodstream infections and 112074 S. aureus non-sterile site cultures were included from Oxfordshire. Resistance trends over time in blood versus other specimens were strongly correlated (maximum cross-correlation 0.51-0.99, strongest associations in the same year for 18/27 pathogen-drug combinations). Resistance prevalence was broadly congruent across drug-years for each species. 276/312 (88%) species-drug-years had resistance prevalence in other specimen types within ±10% of that blood isolates. Results were similar across multiple countries and hospitals/programmes in high/middle/low income-settings.ConclusionsResistance in bloodstream and less invasive infections are strongly related over time, suggesting the latter could be a surveillance tool for AMR in LMICs. These infection sites are easier to sample and cheaper to obtain the necessary numbers of susceptibility tests, providing more cost-effective evidence for decisions including empiric antibiotic recommendations.

Download Full-text

Antimicrobial resistance in the Pacific Island countries and territories

BMJ Global Health ◽

10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002418 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. e002418

Author(s):

Michael Loftus ◽

Andrew Stewardson ◽

Ravi Naidu ◽

Ben Coghlan ◽

Adam Jenney ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Resistance ◽

Low Income ◽

Surveillance Systems ◽

Pacific Island ◽

Middle Income ◽

Middle Income Countries ◽

Adequate Funding ◽

The Pacific ◽

Laboratory Surveillance ◽

Pacific Island Countries

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health threat with a disproportionate impact on low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to their higher burden of infections, reduced laboratory surveillance infrastructure and fewer regulations governing antimicrobial use among humans or animals. While there have been increasing descriptions of AMR within many LMICs in WHO’s Western Pacific and South East Asian regions, there remains a paucity of data from Pacific Island countries and territories (PICTs). The PICTs represent 22 predominantly middle-income countries and territories with a combined population of 12 million people and 20 official languages, spread over hundreds of separate islands spanning an area corresponding to more than 15% of the earth’s surface. Our paper outlines the present state of the evidence regarding AMR in PICTs—discussing the present estimates of AMR and their accompanying limitations, important drivers of AMR, as well as outlining key priorities and potential solutions for tackling AMR in this region. Significant areas for action include developing National Action Plans, strengthening laboratory surveillance systems and educational activities targeted at both healthcare workers and the wider community. Ensuring adequate funding for AMR activities in PICTs is challenging given competing health and environmental priorities, in this context global or regional funding initiatives such as the Fleming Fund can play a key role.

Download Full-text

Waves of attention: patterns and themes of international antimicrobial resistance reports, 1945–2020

BMJ Global Health ◽

10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006909 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 6 (11) ◽

pp. e006909

Author(s):

Kristen Overton ◽

Nicolas Fortané ◽

Alex Broom ◽

Stephanie Raymond ◽

Christoph Gradmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Resistance ◽

Low Income ◽

International Organisations ◽

International Policy ◽

Middle Income ◽

Middle Income Countries ◽

Biomedical Innovation ◽

Qualitative Approaches ◽

Rational Drug ◽

Global North

This article uses quantitative and qualitative approaches to review 75 years of international policy reports on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Our review of 248 policy reports and expert consultation revealed waves of political attention and repeated reframings of AMR as a policy object. AMR emerged as an object of international policy-making during the 1990s. Until then, AMR was primarily defined as a challenge of human and agricultural domains within the Global North that could be overcome via ‘rational’ drug use and selective restrictions. While a growing number of reports jointly addressed human and agricultural AMR selection, international organisations (IOs) initially focused on whistleblowing and reviewing data. Since 2000, there has been a marked shift in the ecological and geographic focus of AMR risk scenarios. The Global South and One Health (OH) emerged as foci of AMR reports. Using the deterritorialised language of OH to frame AMR as a Southern risk made global stewardship meaningful to donors and legitimised pressure on low-income and middle-income countries to adopt Northern stewardship and surveillance frameworks. It also enabled IOs to move from whistleblowing to managing governance frameworks for antibiotic stewardship. Although the environmental OH domain remains neglected, realisation of the complexity of necessary interventions has increased the range of topics targeted by international action plans. Investment nonetheless continues to focus on biomedical innovation and tends to leave aside broader socioeconomic issues. Better knowledge of how AMR framings have evolved is key to broadening participation in international stewardship going forward.

Download Full-text