scholarly journals A qualitative process evaluation of training for non-physician clinicians/associate clinicians (NPCs/ACs) in emergency maternal, neonatal care and clinical leadership, impact on clinical services improvements in rural Tanzania: the ETATMBA project: Table 1

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e009000 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R Ellard ◽  
Aloisia Shemdoe ◽  
Festo Mazuguni ◽  
Godfrey Mbaruku ◽  
David Davies ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A McPherson ◽  
Jyotsna Tamang ◽  
Stephen Hodgins ◽  
Laxmi R Pathak ◽  
Ram C Silwal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolin Wei ◽  
Simin Deng ◽  
Victoria Haldane ◽  
Claire Blacklock ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
...  

Objectives We conducted a qualitative process evaluation embedded in a cluster randomized controlled trial in rural Guangxi China, which successfully reduced antibiotic use for children upper respiratory tract infections. This study aims to report on the factors that influenced behaviour change among providers and caregivers in the intervention arm, and to explore contextual considerations which may have influenced trial outcomes. Methods A total of 35 in-depth interviews were carried out with hospital directors, doctors, and caregivers of children. Participants were recruited from six purposively selected facilities, including two higher performing and two lower performing facilities per trial results. Interviews were conducted in Chinese and translated to English. We also observed guideline training sessions and prescription peer review meetings. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results Intervention-arm doctors described that training sessions improved their knowledge, skills and confidence in appropriate prescribing. This was contrasted by control arm participants who did not receive training and reported less agency in reducing prescribing rates. Prescription peer review meetings were seen as an opportunity for further education, action planning and goal setting, particularly in high performing hospitals, where these meetings were led by senior doctors who were perceived to have relevant clinical experience. Caregiver participants reported that intervention educational materials were helpful but they identified information from doctors was more useful. Providers and caregivers also described contextual health system factors, including hospital competition, short consultation times, and antibiotic availability without prescription, which shaped care preferences. Conclusions This qualitative process evaluation identified a range of factors that may have influenced behaviour among providers and caregivers leading to observed changes in reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in China. Future interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing should consider system level and wider contextual factors to better understand behaviours and patient care preferences.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Carswell ◽  
Joanne Reid ◽  
Ian Walsh ◽  
William Johnston ◽  
Helen McAneney ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Haemodialysis can negatively impact quality of life and mental health. Arts-based interventions used successfully in other settings to improve health and well-being, could help address the impact of haemodialysis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an arts-based intervention for patients receiving haemodialysis. Methods A parallel convergent mixed-methods design was used, including a pilot cluster RCT and qualitative process evaluation. Phase 1 evaluated recruitment and retention rates through a pilot cluster RCT at a single haemodialysis unit in Northern Ireland. Participants included patients who received haemodialysis for ESKD, were over the age of 18 and had the capacity to consent. These participants were randomised to the intervention or control group according to their haemodialysis shift. The intervention involved six one-hour, one-to-one facilitated arts sessions during haemodialysis. Phase 2 explored intervention and trial acceptability through a qualitative process evaluation using semi-structured interviews based on the RE-AIM framework. Participants included 13 patients who participated in phase 1 of the study, including 9 participants from the experimental group and four participants from the control group, and nine healthcare professionals who were present on the unit during implementation. Results Out of 122 outpatient haemodialysis patients, 94 were assessed as eligible for participation. Twenty-four participants were randomised, meaning 80% of the target sample size was recruited and the attrition rate at 3 months was 12.5% (n = 3). Participants viewed the arts as more accessible and enjoyable than anticipated following implementation. All participants who started the intervention (n = 11) completed the full six sessions. Qualitative benefits of the intervention suggest improvements in mental well-being. Patient choice and facilitation were important factors for successful implementation. Conclusion An arts-based intervention for patients receiving haemodialysis is acceptable for both patients and healthcare professionals, and a definitive trial is feasible. The intervention may help improve mental-wellbeing in patients receiving haemodialysis, but this requires further investigation in a definitive trial. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 14/8/2018, registration number NCT03629496.


Author(s):  
Alicia O'Cathain

The focus of this chapter is on reporting the qualitative research in peer-reviewed journal articles. Researchers may publish the qualitative data in a standalone journal article, or combine quantitative and qualitative process evaluation data in the same article, or combine the qualitative and RCT research in the same article. Writing these articles can be challenging, even when focusing solely on the qualitative research. Researchers need to consider the number of articles to be published from the whole study, the focus of each article, selecting a journal, and communicating implications for the RCT. Guidance is offered on the key issues to report in journal articles that focus solely on the qualitative research undertaken with an RCT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document