scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-generation and second-generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depression: protocol for a network meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e010919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshi A Furukawa ◽  
Georgia Salanti ◽  
Lauren Z Atkinson ◽  
Stefan Leucht ◽  
Henricus G Ruhe ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneka Tomlinson ◽  
Orestis Efthimiou ◽  
Katharine Boaden ◽  
Emma New ◽  
Sarah Mather ◽  
...  

IntroductionWe have recently compared all second-generation as well as selected first-generation antidepressants in terms of efficacy and acceptability in the acute treatment of major depression. Here we present a protocol for a network meta-analysis aimed at extending these results, updating the evidence base and comparing all second-generation as well as selected first-generation antidepressants in terms of specific adverse events and tolerability in the acute treatment of major depression in adults.Methods and analysisWe will include all double-blind randomised controlled trials comparing one active drug with another or with placebo in the acute treatment major depression in adults. We will compare the following active agents: agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, clomipramine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, trazodone, venlafaxine, vilazodone and vortioxetine. The main outcomes will include the total number of patients experiencing specific adverse events; experiencing serious adverse events; and experiencing at least one adverse event. Published and unpublished studies will be retrieved through relevant database searches, trial registries and websites; reference selection and data extraction will be completed by at least two independent reviewers. For each outcome we will undertake a network meta-analysis to synthesise all evidence. We will use local and global methods to evaluate consistency. We will perform all analyses in R. We will assess the quality of evidence contributing to network estimates with the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis web application.DiscussionThis work will provide an in- depth analysis and an insight into the specific adverse events of individual antidepressants.Ethics and disseminationThis review does not require ethical approval.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019128141.


1990 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-261
Author(s):  
Candace S. Brown ◽  
Stephen G. Bryant

The major advantage of the new generation of antidepressants lies in their enhanced ability to avoid unwanted side effects, such as anticholinergic or cardiovascular toxicities, and in many cases, to reduce fatalities after overdose. Second-generation antidepressants are as effective as the first generation agents, but are more selective, enabling precise targeting of symptoms. Caution in recommending the newer antidepressants must be applied, however, because these agents possess differing side effects, and unforeseen toxicities may not appear until after several years of use. Conventional tricyclics should not be overlooked in managing the depressed patient. This article discusses the symptoms of major depression, followed by the latest information on second-generation antidepressants. It concludes by providing the pharmacist with guidelines for when to select a newer over an older agent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document