scholarly journals Correction: Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e025801corr1
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Research ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Review Protocol

scholarly journals Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e025801
Author(s):  
Malissa Kay Shaw ◽  
Mojca Babovič ◽  
Lynn Valerie Monrouxe
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Research ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Students ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionStem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived therapeutic efficacy. There is a need to recognise how these developments are understood within the healthcare community and by those who may use them. This protocol describes a systematic literature review that aims to explore healthcare professionals’, healthcare students’, patients’, and donors’ perceptions of SCR and therapy (SCR/T) and the factors that influence their perceptions.Methods and analysisFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines a systematic review will be undertaken. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline+Journals @Ovid and Ariti Library will be systematically searched for studies on healthcare professionals’, healthcare students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of SCR and developing therapies. All articles will be screened by a researcher for inclusion and evaluation based on 12 criteria for evaluating qualitative research. At least 20% of articles will also be reviewed by a second researcher and any disagreement will be solved via consensus. Data extracted from the articles will be analysed using thematic synthesis enabling the identification of concepts across studies and the development of new theory.Ethics and disseminationAs part of a larger research project, ethical approval has been provided by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. This review will be able to determine the impact that certain perceptions of SCR/T will have on the development of future medical knowledge and practice. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018103627.

scholarly journals Protocol for Systematic Review in Privacy and Security in Telehealth: Best Practices for Healthcare Professionals

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie J.M. Watzlaf ◽  
Dilhari R. DeAlmeida ◽  
Leming Zhou ◽  
Linda M. Hartman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Federal Regulations ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Privacy And Security ◽  
Review Protocol

Healthcare professionals engaged in telehealth are faced with complex US federal regulations (e.g., HIPAA/HITECH) and could benefit from the guidance provided by best practices in Privacy and Security (P&S). This article describes a systematic review protocol to address this need. The protocol described herein uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The PRISMA-P contains 17 items that are considered essential, as well as minimum components to include in systematic reviews. PICOS (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcome(s) and study design of the systematic review) are also relevant to the development of best practices in P&S in telehealth systems. A systematic process can best determine what information should be included and how this information should be retrieved, condensed, analyzed, organized, and disseminated.

Sleep and cognition in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A systematic review protocol.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Carruthers ◽  
Gemma Brunetti ◽  
Susan Rossell
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Illnesses ◽  
Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Schizophrenia Spectrum ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Spectrum Disorders ◽  
Sleep And Cognition ◽  
The Relationship

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders are chronic and debilitating mental illnesses characterised by both cognitive impairments and sleep deficits. In this systematic review protocol, we outline an approach to examine the available literature investigating the relationship between sleep and cognition in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document