scholarly journals Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of pretreatment mean platelet volume in cancer: a meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e037614
Author(s):  
Xin Chen ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Xunlei Zhang ◽  
Yushan Liu ◽  
Jindong Wu ◽  
...  

ObjectiveOur study aimed to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of pretreatment mean platelet volume (MPV) on cancer by using meta-analysis of published studies.DesignMeta-analysis.Data sourcesRelevant studies available before 22 December 2019 were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE.Eligibility criteriaAll published studies that assessed the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of pretreatment MPV on cancer were included.Data extraction and synthesisStudies were identified and extracted by two reviewers independently. The HR/OR and its 95% CIs of survival outcomes and clinicopathological parameters were calculated.ResultsA total of 38 eligible studies (41 subsets) with 9894 patients with cancer were included in the final meta-analysis. MPV level was not significantly associated with both overall survival (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.14) and disease-free survival (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.73) of patients with cancer. Neither advanced nor mixed-stage tumour patients showed significant association between MPV and overall survival (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.94, HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09). However, high MPV had the strongest relationship with poor overall survival (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.08 to 3.41) in gastric cancer, followed by pancreatic cancer (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.31 to 1.82). Whereas in the subgroup using receiver operating characteristic curve method to define cut-off values, low MPV was significantly related to poor overall survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.95). In addition, MPV had no significant association with age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.02), sex (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09), depth of cancer invasion (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.04) and tumour stage (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.07).ConclusionsPretreatment MPV level is of no clearly prognostic significance in cancers and no significant association with clinicopathological parameters of patients with cancers.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xunlei Zhang ◽  
Wenjing Zhao ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Xue Qi ◽  
Li Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Systemic inflammatory parameters, such as the elevator PLR (platelet-lymphocyte ratio), have been found to be associated with the prognosis in gastric cancer (GC); however, the results remain controversial. So we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of the PLR in gastric cancer by conducting this meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The hazard ratio (HR) /Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence (CI) of survival outcomes and clinicopathological parameters were calculated. Results: A total of 38 studies (39 cohorts) with 23,317 GC patients were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that elevated PLR was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.25-1.51, p < 0.001; I2= 82.10%, Ph < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.22–1.90, P< 0.001, I2= 88.6%, Ph< 0.001) of GC patients. Furthermore, patients with elevated PLR had a higher risk of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.03–1.70, p=0.027), serosal invasion (T3 +T4) (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31, p=0.017) and increased advanced stage (III+IV) (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.00–1.89, p=0.050). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that elevated PLR was a prognostic factor for poor OS and DFS, and associated with clinicopathological parameters in patients with GC.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xunlei Zhang ◽  
Wenjing Zhao ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Xue Qi ◽  
Li Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pretreatment PLR (platelet-lymphocyte ratio), was reported to be associated with the prognosis in gastric cancer (GC), but the results remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic potential of the pre-treatment PLR in gastric cancer.Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible publications. The hazard ratio (HR) /Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence (CI) of survival outcomes and clinicopathological parameters were calculated.Results: A total of 49 studies (51 cohorts), collectting data from 28,929 GC patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that the elevated pre-treatment PLR was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26-1.49, p < 0.001; I2= 79.90%, Ph < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.22–1.90, P< 0.001, I2= 88.6%, Ph< 0.001). Furthermore, the patients with the elevated PLR had a higher risk of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.33, p=0.023), serosal invasion (T3 +T4) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10–1.64, p=0.003) and increased advanced stage (III+IV) (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06–1.37, p=0.004).Conclusions: An elevated pre-treatment PLR was a prognostic factor for poor OS and DFS, and associated with poor clinicopathological parameters in GC patients .


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xunlei Zhang ◽  
Wenjing Zhao ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Xue Qi ◽  
Li Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Systemic inflammatory parameters, such as the elevator PLR (platelet-lymphocyte ratio), have been found to be associated with the prognosis in gastric cancer (GC); however, the results remain controversial. So we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of the PLR in gastric cancer by conducting this meta-analysis. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The hazard ratio (HR) /Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence (CI) of survival outcomes and clinicopathological parameters were calculated. Results A total of 49 studies (51 cohorts) with 28,929 GC patients were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that elevated PLR was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26–1.49, p < 0.001; I2 = 79.90%, Ph < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.22–1.90, P < 0.001, I2 = 88.6%, Ph< 0.001) of GC patients. Furthermore, patients with elevated PLR had a higher risk of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.33, p = 0.023), serosal invasion (T3 + T4) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10–1.64, p = 0.003) and increased advanced stage (III + IV) (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06–1.37, p = 0.004). Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrated that elevated PLR was a prognostic factor for poor OS and DFS, and associated with clinicopathological parameters in patients with GC.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wang ◽  
Sha Liu ◽  
Guo Ping Sun ◽  
Fang Wang ◽  
Yan Feng Zou ◽  
...  

Background The prognostic significance of the expression of the miR-221/222 family in cancer remains controversial. We here performed a meta-analysis of published data investigating the effects of miR-221/222 expression on both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among patients with cancer. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI databases was performed with the last search being updated on March 15, 2013. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to assess the strength of association. Results A total of 17 studies involving 1,204 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. When assessing the prognostic significance of miR-221 expression, the pooled HR was 1.91 (95% CI: 1.28-2.85, p=0.002) for OS and 1.36 (95% CI: 0.88-2.09, p=0.163) for DFS. When assessing the prognostic significance of miR-222 expression, the pooled HR was 2.15 (95% CI: 1.51-3.06, p<0.0001) for OS and 1.37 (95% CI: 0.45-4.13, p=0.581) for DFS. We also found that an elevated miR-221 expression was significantly associated with poor OS when stratifying by ethnicity, cancer type, statistical methodology, sample, and quality assessment. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion The meta-analysis demonstrates that the elevated expression of miR-221 and miR-222 is associated with poor OS in patients with cancer. The miR-221/222 cluster might be used as a potential therapeutic strategy in clinical practice. More work is required to fully elucidate the role of the miR-221/222 family in human tumors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Kai Liao ◽  
Yen-Lin Yu ◽  
Yueh-Chen Lin ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
Yih-Jong Chern ◽  
...  

Abstract Backgrounds The inflammatory biomarker “C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR)” has been reported to significantly correlate to a variety of human cancers. However, there are conflicting results regarding the prognostic value of CAR in colorectal cancer. Previous studies mainly assessed patients in Eastern countries, so their findings may not be applicable to the Western population. Therefore, this updated meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment CAR and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a systematic search for eligible literature until October 31, 2020, using PubMed and Embase databases. Studies assessing pre-treatment CAR and outcomes of colorectal cancer were included. Outcome measures included overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and clinicopathological features. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effective values. Results A total of 15 studies involving 6329 patients were included in this study. The pooled results indicated that a high pre-treatment CAR was associated with poor overall survival (HR 2.028, 95% CI 1.808−2.275, p < 0.001) and poor disease-free survival/progression-free survival (HR 1.768, 95% CI 1.321–2.365, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed a constant prognostic value of the pre-treatment CAR despite different study regions, sample size, cancer stage, treatment methods, or the cut-off value used. We also noted a correlation between high pre-treatment CAR and old age, male sex, colon cancer, advanced stage (III/IV), large tumor size, poor differentiation, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and the modified Glasgow prognostic score. Conclusions High pre-treatment CAR was associated with poor overall survival, disease-free survival, and progression-free survival in colorectal cancer. It can serve as a prognostic marker for colorectal cancer in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenghao Zhang ◽  
Jieyu He ◽  
Lin Qi ◽  
Zhixi Duan ◽  
Lu Wan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as pivotal regulators in osteosarcoma tumorigenesis and progression, but their prognostic and diagnostic significance remain unclear. Herein, we aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis to explore the clinical, diagnostic and prognostic values of circRNAs in osteosarcoma. Methods Several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library, were systematically searched up to Mar 10, 2020. Eligible studies regarding the relationship between circRNAs levels and clinicopathological, diagnostic and prognostic values in osteosarcoma patients were included in this study. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure clinical characteristics, while hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were adopted to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Overall, 26 relevant studies involving 1,652 patients with osteosarcoma were enrolled, with eighteen studies on clinicopathological parameters, ten on diagnosis and eighteen on prognosis. For clinical parameters, overexpression of oncogenic circRNAs was intimately correlated with larger tumor size (P <0.00001), advanced Enneking stage (P <0.00001), poor differentiation (P =0.0001), and distant metastasis (DM) (P <0.00001). In contrast, the downregulated circRNAs showed negative correlation with Enneking stage (P=0.002) and DM (P<0.0001). For the diagnostic values, the summary area under the curve (AUC) of circRNA for the discriminative efficacy between osteosarcoma patients and non-cancer counterparts was estimated to be 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), with a weighted sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84), specificity of 0.80 (95%: 0.75-0.84), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 15.48 (10.85-22.10), respectively. For the prognostic significance, oncogenic circRNAs had poor OS (HR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.68-2.19) and DFS (HR=2.65, 95% CI: 2.02-3.49), while elevated expression of tumor-suppressor circRNAs were closely related to longer OS (HR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.28-0.69). Conclusions Taken together, our study showed that aberrantly expressed circRNA signatures could serve as potential predictive indicators in diagnosis and prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenghao Zhang ◽  
Jieyu He ◽  
Lin Qi ◽  
Zhixi Duan ◽  
Lu Wan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background CircRNAs have emerged as pivotal regulators in osteosarcoma tumorigenesis and progression, but their prognostic and diagnostic significance remain unclear. Herein, we aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis to explore the clinical, diagnostic and prognostic values of circRNAs in osteosarcoma. Methods Several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library, were systematically searched up to April 10, 2020. Eligible studies regarding the relationship between circRNAs levels and clinicopathological, diagnostic and prognostic values in osteosarcoma patients were included in this study. Pooled odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to measure clinical characteristics, while hazard ratios with 95% CIs were adopted to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Overall, 26 relevant studies involving 1,652 patients with osteosarcoma were enrolled, with eighteen studies on clinicopathological parameters, ten on diagnosis and eighteen on prognosis. For clinical parameters, overexpression of oncogenic circRNAs was intimately correlated with larger tumor size (P < 0.00001), advanced Enneking stage (P < 0.00001), poor differentiation (P = 0.0001), and distant metastasis (DM) (P < 0.00001). In contrast, the downregulated circRNAs showed negative correlation with Enneking stage (P = 0.002) and DM (P < 0.0001). For the diagnostic values, the summary area under the curve of circRNA for the discriminative efficacy between osteosarcoma patients and non-cancer counterparts was estimated to be 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89), with a weighted sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74–0.84), specificity of 0.80 (95%: 0.75–0.84), and diagnostic odds ratio of 15.48 (10.85–22.10), respectively. For the prognostic significance, oncogenic circRNAs had poor OS (HR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.68–2.19) and DFS (HR = 2.65, 95% CI: 2.02–3.49), while elevated expression of tumor-suppressor circRNAs were closely related to longer OS (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.28–0.69). Conclusions Taken together, our study showed that aberrantly expressed circRNA signatures could serve as potential biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (9) ◽  
pp. 863-871
Author(s):  
Mariem Ben Elhadj ◽  
Asma Fourati ◽  
Olfa El Amine ◽  
Aida Goucha ◽  
Ahmed El May ◽  
...  

Objectives: Tobacco and alcohol are the main etiological factors common to laryngeal cancers. However, the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) constitutes an alternative risk factor according to several studies. In Tunisia, despite the annual increasing incidence of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), the prevalence and prognostic significance of HPV have never been explored. In this study, we sought to highlight HPV DNA in 70 biopsies of laryngeal cancer, and to analyze the status of HPV infection in association with p53, p16, survivin, and IGF-1R expressions. Methods: HPV high risk (HPV HR) DNA was detected in tumors by in situ hybridization. However, the expression of p53, p16, survivin and IGF-1R were stained by immunohistochemistry test. The correlations of HPV status with clinicopathological parameters, overall survival, disease-free survival and proteins expressions were statistically evaluated. Results: HPV HR DNA was detected in 39 out of 70 (55.71%) laryngeal tumors. HPV+ patients have a better overall survival ( P = .081) and long disease-free-survival ( P = .016) with a low rate of recurrence ( P = .006) than HPV– patients. No significant correlations were found between HPV HR status and clinicopathological parameters (all P > .005). Moreover, HPV+ tumors were not associated with expression of p53, p16 and survivin. However, HPV HR status correlates with weak to moderate IGF-1R expression ( P = .043). Conclusion: The substantial detection of HPV HR in LSCC tumors suggest that this virus plays an important part in laryngeal cancer in Tunisia. It is a good prognostic factor. In addition, HPV infection could act to block the pathway of IGF-1R expression.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renfu Lu ◽  
Junjian Chen ◽  
Lingwen Kong ◽  
Hao Zhu

Background: There is a dispute on the prognostic value of long non-coding RNA regulator of reprogramming (lncRNA ROR) in cancers. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of lncRNA ROR expression in human cancers. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to look for relevant studies. The meta-analyses of prognostic and clinicopathological parameters (CPs) were conducted. Results: A total of ten studies were finally included into the meta-analysis. High lncRNA ROR expression was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.16–3.84, P<0.01) and disease-free survival (HR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.30–4.60, P<0.01) compared with low lncRNA ROR expression. Besides, high lncRNA ROR expression was obviously related to more advanced clinical stage (P<0.01), earlier tumor metastasis (P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (P<0.01), and vascular invasion (P<0.01) compared with low lncRNA ROR expression. However, there was no significant correlation between lncRNA ROR expression and other CPs, including age (P=0.18), gender (P=0.33), tumor size (P=0.25), or tumor differentiation (P=0.13). Conclusion: High lncRNA ROR expression was associated with worse prognosis in cancers. LncRNA ROR expression could serve as an unfavorable prognostic factor in various cancers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caizhi Chen ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Yeqian Feng ◽  
Ye Liang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: LncRNA TP73-AS1 is dysregulated in various tumors but the correlation between its expression and clinicopathological parameters and/or prognoses in cancer patients is inconclusive. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of lncRNA TP73-AS1 for malignancies.Methods: We systematically searched four online databases including PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible articles published up to June 29/2020. Odds ratios (ORs) and Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the association of TP73-AS1 expression with prognostic and clinicopathological parameters. We further validated TP73-AS1 expression in various malignancies and its potential prognostic value using the GEPIA online database. We predicted potential biological processes and relevant signal mechanisms through the public databases.Results: A total of 26 studies including 1770 patients were analyzed to evaluate the relationship between TP73-AS1 expression, clinicopathological features and prognostic indicators. The results indicated that TP73-AS1 expression markedly correlates with TNM stage, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. No correlation with age, gender or differentiation was observed. TP73-AS1 overexpression was a biomarker of poor Overall survival (OS) and Disease-Free-Survival (DFS). Dysregulated TP73-AS1 expression and its prognostic value in various cancers was validated based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Further biological function predictions indicated that TP73-AS1 was involved in pro-oncogenic signaling.Conclusions: The upregulation of LncRNA TP73-AS1 was related to detrimental clinicopathological parameters and can be considered an indicator of poor prognosis for cancer malignancies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document