Comparison of outcomes of neurosurgical operations performed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a matched cohort study

ObjectiveTo determine how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected outcomes for all operatively managed neurosurgical patients, not only those positive for SARS-CoV-2.DesignMatched cohort (pairwise method).SettingA single tertiary neurosurgical referral centre at a large UK Major Trauma Centre.ParticipantsDuring the first COVID-19 wave, 231 neurosurgical cases were performed. These cases were matched to cases from 2019. Cases were matched for age (±10 years), primary pathology and surgical procedure. Cases were excluded from analysis if either the age could not be matched to within 10 years, or the primary pathology or procedure was too unique. After exclusions, 191 cases were included in final analysis.Outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) on discharge, length of stay (LoS), operative and anaesthetic times and grade of primary surgeon. An exploratory outcome was the SARS-CoV-2 status of patients.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the pandemic and matched cohorts in 30-day mortality, pulmonary complications, discharge GOS, LoS, operative or anaesthetic times. There was a significant difference in the variation of grade of primary surgeon. Only 2.2% (n=5) of patients had a SARS-CoV-2 positive swab.ConclusionDuring the first UK wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the mortality, morbidity and functional outcomes of operatively managed neurosurgical patients at University Hospitals Birmingham were not significantly affected compared with normal practice. The grade of primary surgeon was significantly more senior and adds to the growing body of evidence that demonstrates how the pandemic has negatively impacted UK surgical training. Mixing COVID-19 positive, unknown and negative cases did not significantly impact on outcomes and indicates that further research is required to support the implementation of evidence-based surgical pathways, such as COVID-light sites, throughout the next stage of the pandemic.

Download Full-text

92 Increased Proportion of Alcohol-Related Trauma in A South London Major Trauma Centre During Lockdown, A Cohort Study

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab258.062 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽

Author(s):

O Brown ◽

T Smith ◽

A Gaukroger ◽

P Tsinaslanidis ◽

C Hing

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Blood Alcohol ◽

Regression Analyses ◽

Electronic Patient Records ◽

Staffing Levels ◽

The United Kingdom ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Alcohol has been associated with 10-35% trauma admissions and 40% trauma-related deaths globally. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the United Kingdom (UK) entered a state of ‘lockdown’ on 23rd March 2020. Restrictions were most significantly eased on 1st June 2020, when shops and schools re-opened. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of lockdown on alcohol-related trauma admissions. Method All adult patients admitted as ‘trauma calls’ to a London Major Trauma Centre (MTC) during April 2018 and April 2019 (pre-lockdown; N = 316), and 1st April – 31st May 2020 (lockdown; N = 191) had electronic patient records analysed. Patients’ blood alcohol level and records of intoxication were used to identify alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions from pre- and post-lockdown cohorts were compared using multiple regression analyses. Results Alcohol-related trauma was present in a significantly higher proportion of adult trauma calls during lockdown (lockdown 60/191 (31.4%), versus pre-lockdown 62/316 (19.6%); (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.28, p < 0.001). Lockdown was also associated with increased weekend admissions of trauma (lockdown 125/191 weekend (65.5%) vs pre-lockdown 179/316 (56.7%); OR -0.40, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.02, p = 0.041). No significant difference existed in the age, gender, or mechanism between pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts (p > 0.05). Conclusions UK lockdown was independently associated with an increased proportion of alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions were increased during the weekend when staffing levels are reduced. With the possibility of subsequent global ‘waves’ of Covid-19, the risk of long-term repercussions of dangerous alcohol-related behaviour to public health must be addressed.

Download Full-text

P9 Impact of the relocation of a regional neuroscience service on major trauma patients

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry ◽

10.1136/jnnp-2019-abn.89 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 90 (3) ◽

pp. e28.2-e28

Author(s):

C Cabaret ◽

M Nelson ◽

M Foroughi

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Strong Association ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Ct Head ◽

The Mean ◽

The Impact ◽

Mean Time

ObjectivesEvaluating the impact of relocating a regional neuroscience service on major trauma patients.DesignRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 01/08/2013 to 31/07/2017.SubjectsPatients≥20 years with a TBI in the 2 years pre-relocation (cohort 1) and 2 years post-relocation (cohort 2).MethodsPatients were identified using the TARN registry. Comparison of the cohorts for demographics, type of neurosurgical input, site of first presentation and the times to first CT head and operation was conducted using cross-tabulation, percentages and statistical analysis (SPSS).Results30% of patients in cohort 1 (112 or 373) were admitted in neurosurgery. This increased to 40% of patients in cohort 2 (181 of 450). There was an increase in admissions for monitoring (70% vs 82%). Patients<60 years had a higher increment in admission (+16 points) than patients≥60 years (+8 points). A strong association was found between the relocation of the neuroscience service and the increase in proportion of patients first transported to the major trauma centre (63% vs 74%; p=0.037). There was a significant decrease in the mean time to operation (3.9 hour vs 2.0 hour; p=0.008) and no significant difference in the mean time to first CT head (1.3 hour vs 1.4 hour; p=0.689).ConclusionsThe relocation of neurosurgery has resulted in a significant increase in admission of patients<60 years with TBI in neurosurgery for monitoring, an increase in the proportion of patients first transported to the MTC and a reduction in the time to operation.

Download Full-text

Severe equestrian injuries: A seven-year review of admissions to a UK major trauma centre

Trauma ◽

10.1177/14604086211041271 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 146040862110412

Author(s):

Aref-Ali Gharooni ◽

Fahim Anwar ◽

Romann Ramdeep ◽

Harry Mee

Keyword(s):

United Kingdom ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Common Mechanism ◽

Mechanism Of Injury ◽

The United Kingdom ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Limb Injuries ◽

Significant Difference

Background Equestrian sports are regaining popularity in the United Kingdom. Due to horses’ considerable weight and speed, serious injuries can occur. Riding style and equipment differ between North America and the United Kingdom with previous studies focusing on the former. Objective This study aims to assess the pattern of horse-related injury admissions to a major trauma centre in the United Kingdom. Methods A retrospective study of our hospital’s trauma registry between years 2012 and 2020 was performed. Cases included those admitted for severe horse-related injuries (irrespective of age/sex) with Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥ 4. Demographics, injury characteristics (ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), injury region and operations), hospital stay and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) on discharge were extracted. Four groups were formed based on mechanism of injury: fall from horse, fall and horse landing on top (FL group), kicked, and fall and kicked (FK group). Comparisons in injury and outcomes were analysed between these groups. Results 301 (2.8%) eligible cases were identified from 10,911 cases. 70.8% were female with mean (± SD) age of 42.7 (± 16.5) years. Most common mechanism of injury was fall (72.8%) then kicked (14.6%) with groups FL and FK forming < 10% each. No significant difference was found between the groups initial GCS, ISS, total or ICU length of stay and GOS ( p > 0.05). Most common regions of injury were orthopaedic (41.9%), spinal (26.2%), thoracic (20.1%) and head injuries (19.3%). 75% had good recovery on GOS though there were 3 fatalities relating to severe traumatic brain injury. Conclusion Orthopaedic limb injuries form the majority of horse-related injuries which contrasts the 1970s where head injury prevailed which is likely due to the widespread use of better head protection. Consideration should be given to enhanced limb safety equipment to prevent injury.

Download Full-text

Laparotomy for Abdominal Stab Wound With Combined Omental and Organ Evisceration: 10-Year Experience From a Major Trauma Centre in South Africa

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/00031348211031855 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 000313482110318

Author(s):

Victor Kong ◽

Cynthia Cheung ◽

Nigel Rajaretnam ◽

Rohit Sarvepalli ◽

William Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

South Africa ◽

Small Bowel ◽

Large Bowel ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Stab Wound ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Mean ◽

Overall Mortality

Introduction Combined omental and organ evisceration following anterior abdominal stab wound (SW) is uncommon and there is a paucity of literature describing the management and spectrum of injuries encountered at laparotomy. Methods A retrospective study was undertaken on all patients who presented with anterior abdominal SW involving combined omental and organ evisceration who underwent laparotomy over a 10-year period from January 2008 to January 2018 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. Results A total of 61 patients were eligible for inclusion and all underwent laparotomy: 87% male, mean age: 29 years. Ninety-two percent (56/61) had a positive laparotomy whilst 8% (5/61) underwent a negative procedure. Of the 56 positive laparotomies, 91% (51/56) were considered therapeutic and 9% (5/56) were non-therapeutic. In addition to omental evisceration, 59% (36/61) had eviscerated small bowel, 28% (17/61) had eviscerated colon and 13% (8/61) had eviscerated stomach. A total of 92 organ injuries were identified. The most commonly injured organs were small bowel, large bowel and stomach. The overall complication rate was 11%. Twelve percent (7/61) required intensive care unit admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. The overall mortality rate for all 61 patients was 2%. Conclusions The presence of combined omental and organ evisceration following abdominal SW mandates laparotomy. The small bowel, large bowel and stomach were the most commonly injured organs in this setting.

Download Full-text

592 Surgical Management of Open Tibia Fractures at A Major Trauma Centre: A Review of Cases Over A One-Year Period

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab134.153 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

A Khajuria

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Surgical Management ◽

Open Fracture ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Soft Tissue Coverage ◽

Internal Stabilization ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Tibia Fractures ◽

One Year

Abstract Introduction The BOAST/BAPRAS updated the open fracture guidelines in December 2017 to replace BOAST 4 Open fracture guidelines; the changes gave clearer recommendations for timing of surgery and recommendations for reducing infection rates. Method Our work retrospectively evaluates the surgical management of open tibia fractures at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC), over a one-year period in light of key standards (13,14 and 15 of the standards for open fractures). Results The vast majority of cases (93%) had definitive internal stabilization only when immediate soft tissue coverage was achievable. 90% of cases were not managed as ‘clean cases’ following the initial debridement. 50% of cases underwent definitive closure within 72 hours. The reasons for definitive closure beyond 72hours were: patients medically unwell (20%), multiple wound debridement’s (33%) and no medical or surgical reason was clearly stated (47%). Conclusions The implementation of a ‘clean surgery’ protocol following surgical debridement is essential in diminishing risk of recontamination and infection. Hence, this must be the gold standard and should be clearly documented in operation notes. The extent of availability of a joint Orthoplastic theatre list provides a key limiting step in definitive bony fixation and soft tissue coverage of open tibia fractures.

Download Full-text