Implementation of the StandingTall programme to prevent falls in older people: a process evaluation protocol

IntroductionOne in three people aged 65 years and over fall each year. The health, economic and personal impact of falls will grow substantially in the coming years due to population ageing. Developing and implementing cost-effective strategies to prevent falls and mobility problems among older people is therefore an urgent public health challenge. StandingTall is a low-cost, unsupervised, home-based balance exercise programme delivered through a computer or tablet. StandingTall has a simple user-interface that incorporates physical and behavioural elements designed to promote compliance. A large randomised controlled trial in 503 community-dwelling older people has shown that StandingTall is safe, has high adherence rates and is effective in improving balance and reducing falls. The current project targets a major need for older people and will address the final steps needed to scale this innovative technology for widespread use by older people across Australia and internationally.Methods and analysisThis project will endeavour to recruit 300 participants across three sites in Australia and 100 participants in the UK. The aim of the study is to evaluate the implementation of StandingTall into the community and health service settings in Australia and the UK. The nested process evaluation will use both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore uptake and acceptability of the StandingTall programme and associated resources. The primary outcome is participant adherence to the StandingTall programme over 6 months.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the South East Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC reference 18/288) in Australia and the North West- Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (IRAS ID: 268954) in the UK. Dissemination will be via publications, conferences, newsletter articles, social media, talks to clinicians and consumers and meetings with health departments/managers.Trial registration numberACTRN12619001329156.

Download Full-text

Better evidence for earlier assessment and surgical intervention for refractory epilepsy (The BEST study): a mixed methods study protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017148 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (8) ◽

pp. e017148 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Frances Rapport ◽

Patti Shih ◽

Rebecca Mitchell ◽

Armin Nikpour ◽

Andrew Bleasel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mixed Methods ◽

Health Services ◽

Research Ethics ◽

Surgical Intervention ◽

Refractory Epilepsy ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

Local Health ◽

Health Services Use ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

Resective Surgery

IntroductionOne-third of patients with refractory epilepsy may be candidates for resective surgery, which can lead to positive clinical outcomes if efficiently managed. In Australia, there is currently between a 6-month and 2-year delay for patients who are candidates for respective epilepsy surgery from the point of referral for surgical assessment to the eventual surgical intervention. This is a major challenge for implementation of effective treatment for individuals who could potentially benefit from surgery. This study examines implications of delays following the point of eligibility for surgery, in the assessment and treatment of patients, and the factors causing treatment delays.Methods and analysisMixed methods design: Observations of qualitative consultations, patient and healthcare professional interviews, and health-related quality of life assessments for a group of 10 patients and six healthcare professionals (group 1); quantitative retrospective medical records’ reviews examining longitudinal outcomes for 50 patients assessed for, or undergoing, resective surgery between 2014 and 2016 (group 2); retrospective epidemiological study of all individuals hospitalised with a diagnosis of epilepsy in New South Wales (NSW) in the last 5 years (2012–2016; approximately 11 000 hospitalisations per year, total 55 000), examining health services’ use and treatment for individuals with epilepsy, including refractory surgery outcomes (group 3).Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been granted by the North Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/17/HAWKE/22) and the NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee (HREC/16/CIPHS/1). Results will be disseminated through publications, reports and conference presentations to patients and families, health professionals and researchers.

Download Full-text

Current provision of myelopathy education in medical schools in the UK: protocol for a national medical student survey

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035563 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (8) ◽

pp. e035563

Author(s):

Oliver Mowforth ◽

Benjamin Davies ◽

Max Stewart ◽

Sam Smith ◽

Alice Willison ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Medical Student ◽

Research Ethics ◽

Medical Schools ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

Psychology Research ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

University Of Cambridge ◽

Ethical Approval ◽

The Uk ◽

The Impact

IntroductionDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common, disabling and progressive neurological condition triggered by chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord by surrounding degenerative changes. Early diagnosis and specialist management are essential to reduce disability, yet time to diagnosis is typically prolonged. Lack of sufficient representation of DCM in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula may contribute to the poor recognition of DCM by non-specialist doctors in clinical practice.In this study, our objective, therefore, is to assess DCM teaching provision in medical schools throughout the UK and to assess the impact of teaching on the DCM knowledge of UK medical students.Methods and analysisA 19-item questionnaire capturing data on medical student demographics, myelopathy teaching and myelopathy knowledge was designed. Ethical approval was granted by the Psychology Research Ethics Committee, University of Cambridge. An online survey was hosted on Myelopathy.org, an international myelopathy charity. Students studying at a UK medical school are eligible for inclusion. The survey is advertised nationally through university social media pages, university email bulletins and the national student network of Myelopathy.org. Advertisements are scheduled monthly over a 12-month recruitment period. Participation is incentivised by entering consenting participants of completed surveys to an Amazon voucher prize draw. Responses are anonymised using participant-chosen unique identifier codes. A participant information sheet followed by an explicit survey question captures participant informed consent. Regular updates on the progress of the study will be published on Myelopathy.org.Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval for the study was granted by the Psychology Research Ethics Committee, University of Cambridge (PRE.2018.099). The findings of the study described in this protocol, and all other related work, will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at scientific conferences.

Download Full-text

How to approach a research ethics committee

Advances in Psychiatric Treatment ◽

10.1192/apt.bp.106.002915 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 220-227 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

George Masterton ◽

Prem Shah

Keyword(s):

Research Ethics ◽

Ethics Committees ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

Successful Outcome ◽

Research Ethics Committees ◽

Research Projects ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

The Uk

This article describes research ethics and the UK research ethics system for psychiatrists who are engaged in research or in supporting trainees with research projects. The emphasis on practical aspects should ensure that submissions to research ethics committees are improved, and consequently the likelihood of a successful outcome is increased.

Download Full-text

Overcoming ethical barriers to research

Research Ethics ◽

10.1177/1747016117739938 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 14 (3) ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Helen E Machin ◽

Steven M Shardlow

Keyword(s):

Research Ethics ◽

Social Groups ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

University Research ◽

Ethical Challenges ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

Chinese Migrants ◽

The Uk ◽

General Guidance

Researchers engaged in studies about ‘hidden social groups’ are likely to face several ethical challenges. Using a study with undocumented Chinese migrants in the UK, challenges involved in obtaining approval by a university research ethics committee are explored. General guidance about how to resolve potential research ethics issues, with particular reference to ‘hidden social groups’, prior to submission to a research ethics committee is presented.

Download Full-text

Ethical issues in action-oriented research in Indonesia

Nursing Ethics ◽

10.1177/0969733016646156 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 24 (6) ◽

pp. 686-693 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Rini Rachmawaty

Keyword(s):

Research Ethics ◽

Human Subject ◽

Ethical Issues ◽

Human Subjects ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

International Standards ◽

Local Health ◽

Human Subject Research ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

Oriented Research

Background: Action-oriented research is one of the most frequent research types implemented to transform community health in Indonesia. Three researchers and 11 graduate students from a developed country in East Asia conducted a fieldwork program in a remote area in South Sulawesi Province. Although the project was completed, whether or not the international standards for human subject research were applied into that study remains unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to examine ethical issues raised from that case, analyze constraints to the problems, and recommend alternatives to protect vulnerable populations from being exploited by local/international researchers. Methods: A problem-solving approach was used in this study. It began with problem identification, evaluation of the action-oriented research goal, investigation of the constraints to the problem, and recommendation of some relevant alternatives to address the central issue. Ethical Consideration: The approval for conducting the action-oriented research that being investigated in this work was only obtained from the Head of local district. Results: Some ethical issues were found in this case. No special protection for this population, no informed consent was obtained from the participants, exposure to social and economic risks, no future benefits for the subjects, and conflict of interests. Lack of control from the local research ethics committee and lack of competence of local researchers on human subject research were considered as the constraints to the problems. Discussion: Creating an independent research ethics committee, providing research ethics training to the local researchers, obtaining written/video consents from underserved populations, and meeting local health needs were recommended alternatives to solve these problems. Conclusion: Indonesian government bodies should reform their international collaborative system on research involving human subjects. Exploitation may not occur if all participants as well as all local and national governing bodies understand the research ethics on human subjects and apply it into their practice.

Download Full-text

Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026840 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. e026840 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Carla Denneny ◽

Sue Bourne ◽

Simon E Kolstoe

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Research Ethics ◽

Ethics Committees ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

Trial Registration ◽

Research Ethics Committees ◽

The European Union ◽

Clinical Trial Registration ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

The Uk

ObjectiveTo determine levels of public registration for a cohort of clinical trials reviewed and given a favourable opinion by research ethics committees in the United Kingdom.Study designAudit of records.SettingClinical trials receiving a favourable ethics opinion between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2016.Main outcome measuresCorrelation between trials on the UK research ethics committee database and any primary registry entry on the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform or clinicaltrials.gov as of 29 August 2017 (14 to 20 months after the favourable ethics committee opinion).ResultsOver the study period 1014 trials received a favourable ethics opinion, with 397 (39%) registered on the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials database, and 18 with an agreed clinical trial registration deferral. Excluding these trials, the total number subsequently requiring registration was 599, and of these 405 (40% of total) were found to be registered. Follow-up with the 194 investigators or sponsors of trials not found to be registered produced 121 responses with a further 10 (1%) trials having already registered, 55 commitments to register and a variety of other responses. The overall registration rate was therefore 80%.ConclusionsDespite researchers and sponsors being reminded that registration of clinical trials is a condition of the research ethics committee (REC) favourable opinion, one-fifth of clinical trials either had not been registered, or their registration could not easily be found, 14 to 20 months after receiving the favourable opinion letter. The methodology trialled here proved effective, and although there are positive indications of a culture change towards greater registration, our results show that more still needs to be done to increase trial registration.

Download Full-text

Citizens, Research Ethics Committee Members and Researchers’ Attitude Toward Information and Consent for the Secondary Use of Health Data: Implications for Research Within Learning Health Systems

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics ◽

10.1177/1556264621992214 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 155626462199221

Author(s):

Annabelle Cumyn ◽

Roxanne Dault ◽

Adrien Barton ◽

Anne-Marie Cloutier ◽

Jean-François Ethier

Keyword(s):

Research Ethics ◽

Health Systems ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

Health Data ◽

Data Reuse ◽

Fundamental Importance ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

Secondary Use ◽

Public Perspectives ◽

Advance Knowledge

A survey was conducted to assess citizens, research ethics committee members, and researchers’ attitude toward information and consent for the secondary use of health data for research within learning health systems (LHSs). Results show that the reuse of health data for research to advance knowledge and improve care is valued by all parties; consent regarding health data reuse for research has fundamental importance particularly to citizens; and all respondents deemed important the existence of a secure website to support the information and consent processes. This survey was part of a larger project that aims at exploring public perspectives on alternate approaches to the current consent models for health data reuse to take into consideration the unique features of LHSs. The revised model will need to ensure that citizens are given the opportunity to be better informed about upcoming research and have their say, when possible, in the use of their data.

Download Full-text

Developing a policy to reduce the salt content of food consumed outside the home in Malaysia: protocol of a qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044628 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (7) ◽

pp. e044628

Author(s):

Mhairi Karen Brown ◽

Suzana Shahar ◽

Yee Xing You ◽

Viola Michael ◽

Hazreen Abdul Majid ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Medical Research ◽

Research Ethics ◽

Salt Intake ◽

Salt Content ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

Salt Reduction ◽

Reduction Strategy ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

School Canteen ◽

Medical Research Ethics

IntroductionCurrent salt intake in Malaysia is high. The existing national salt reduction policy has faced slow progress and does not yet include measures to address the out of home sector. Dishes consumed in the out of home sector are a known leading contributor to daily salt intake. This study aims to develop a salt reduction strategy, tailored to the out of home sector in Malaysia.Methods and analysisThis study is a qualitative analysis of stakeholder views towards salt reduction. Participants will be recruited from five zones of Malaysia (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern regions and East Malaysia), including policy-makers, non-governmental organisations, food industries, school canteen operators, street food vendors and consumers, to participate in focus group discussions or in-depth interviews. Interviews will be transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Barriers will be identified and used to develop a tailored salt reduction strategy.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Research Ethics Committee (UKM PPI/1118/JEP-2020–524), the Malaysian National Medical Research Ethics Committee (NMRR-20-1387-55481 (IIR)) and Queen Mary University of London Research Ethics Committee (QMERC2020/37) . Results will be presented orally and in report form and made available to the relevant ministries for example, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Trade to encourage adoption of strategy as policy. The findings of this study will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and webinars.

Download Full-text

Early Moves: a protocol for a population-based prospective cohort study to establish general movements as an early biomarker of cognitive impairment in infants

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041695 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. e041695

Author(s):

Catherine Elliott ◽

Caroline Alexander ◽

Alison Salt ◽

Alicia J Spittle ◽

Roslyn N Boyd ◽

...

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Research Ethics ◽

Prospective Cohort Study ◽

Prospective Cohort ◽

Ethics Committee ◽

Research Ethics Committee ◽

National Implementation ◽

General Movements

IntroductionThe current diagnostic pathways for cognitive impairment rarely identify babies at risk before 2 years of age. Very early detection and timely targeted intervention has potential to improve outcomes for these children and support them to reach their full life potential. Early Moves aims to identify early biomarkers, including general movements (GMs), for babies at risk of cognitive impairment, allowing early intervention within critical developmental windows to enable these children to have the best possible start to life.Method and analysisEarly Moves is a double-masked prospective cohort study that will recruit 3000 term and preterm babies from a secondary care setting. Early Moves will determine the diagnostic value of abnormal GMs (at writhing and fidgety age) for mild, moderate and severe cognitive delay at 2 years measured by the Bayley-4. Parents will use the Baby Moves smartphone application to video their babies’ GMs. Trained GMs assessors will be masked to any risk factors and assessors of the primary outcome will be masked to the GMs result. Automated scoring of GMs will be developed through applying machine-based learning to the data and the predictive value for an abnormal GM will be investigated. Screening algorithms for identification of children at risk of cognitive impairment, using the GM assessment (GMA), and routinely collected social and environmental profile data will be developed to allow more accurate prediction of cognitive outcome at 2 years. A cost evaluation for GMA implementation in preparation for national implementation will be undertaken including exploring the relationship between cognitive status and healthcare utilisation, medical costs, health-related quality of life and caregiver burden.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Joondalup Health Services and the Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (1902) of Curtin University (HRE2019-0739).Trial registration numberACTRN12619001422112.

Download Full-text