What tools are available to identify patients with palliative care needs in primary care: a systematic literature review and survey of European practice

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke Arnoldina Theodora Maas ◽  
Scott A Murray ◽  
Yvonne Engels ◽  
Christine Campbell
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A13.1-A13
Author(s):  
Bruce Mason ◽  
Kirsty Boyd ◽  
Christine Campbell ◽  
John Steyn ◽  
Marilyn Kendall ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwa Halabi ◽  
Inaam Khalaf ◽  
Salam Bani Hani

Purpose This study aims to review the lived experience of patients suffering from stroke and describe their perception of palliative care needs. Design/methodology/approach A literature review search was conducted. Web of Sciences, SAGE, CINAHL, PubMed and Jordanian Database for Nursing Research databases were used to search the literature. Findings The findings of 37 articles were address palliative care approaches for patients with stroke, lived experiences of patients suffering from stroke and the experience, barriers and facilitators related to health-care service for stroke survivors. Originality/value This review indicated the importance of recognizing palliative care needs among patients suffering from stroke to improve post-stroke recovery. This study recommends further research, especially in low- and middle-income countries, to understand patients’ experiences and recognize the main palliative care needs that can be incorporated into interventions designed to improve the quality of life among them.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousuf ElMokhallalati ◽  
Stephen H Bradley ◽  
Emma Chapman ◽  
Lucy Ziegler ◽  
Fliss EM Murtagh ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A17.1-A17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Carduff ◽  
Anne Finucance ◽  
Marilyn Kendall ◽  
Alison Jarvis ◽  
Nadine Harrison ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110198
Author(s):  
Javiera Leniz ◽  
Irene J Higginson ◽  
Deokhee Yi ◽  
Zia Ul-Haq ◽  
Amanda Lucas ◽  
...  

Background: Hospital admissions among people dying with dementia are common. It is not known whether identification of palliative care needs could help prevent unnecessary admissions. Aim: To examine the proportion of people with dementia identified as having palliative care needs in their last year of life, and the association between identification of needs and primary, community and hospital services in the last 90 days. Design: Retrospective cohort study using Discover, an administrative and clinical dataset from 365 primary care practices in London with deterministic individual-level data linkage to community and hospital records. Setting/participants: People diagnosed with dementia and registered with a general practitioner in North West London (UK) who died between 2016 and 2019. The primary outcome was multiple non-elective hospital admissions in the last 90 days of life. Secondary outcomes included contacts with primary and community care providers. We examined the association between identification of palliative care needs with outcomes. Results: Among 5804 decedents with dementia, 1953 (33.6%) were identified as having palliative care needs, including 1141 (19.7%) identified before the last 90 days of life. Identification of palliative care needs before the last 90 days was associated with a lower risk of multiple hospital admissions (Relative Risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.58–0.85) and more contacts with the primary care practice, community nurses and palliative care teams in the last 90 days. Conclusions: Further investigation of the mechanisms underlying the association between identification of palliative care needs and reduced hospital admissions could help reduce reliance on acute care for this population.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabienne Teike Lüthi ◽  
Mathieu Bernard ◽  
Michel Beauverd ◽  
Claudia Gamondi ◽  
Anne-Sylvie Ramelet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Early identification of patients requiring palliative care is a major public health concern. A growing number of instruments exist to help professionals to identify these patients, however, thus far, none have been thoroughly assessed for criterion validity. In addition, no currently available instruments differentiate between patients in need of general vs. specialised palliative care, and most are primarily intended for use by physicians. This study aims to develop and rigorously validate a new interprofessional instrument allowing identification of patients in need of general vs specialised palliative care. Methods The instrument development involved four steps: i) literature review to determine the concept to measure; ii) generation of a set of items; iii) review of the initial set of items by experts to establish the content validity; iv) administration of the items to a sample of the target population to establish face validity. We conducted a Delphi process with experts in palliative care to accomplish step 3 and sent a questionnaire to nurses and physicians non-specialised in palliative care to achieve step 4. The study was conducted in the French and Italian-speaking regions of Switzerland. An interdisciplinary committee of clinical experts supervised all steps. Results The literature review confirmed the necessity of distinguishing between general and specialised palliative care needs and of adapting clinical recommendations to these different needs. Thirty-six nurses and physicians participated in the Delphi process and 28 were involved in the face validity assessment. The Delphi process resulted in two lists: a 7-item list to identify patients in need of general PC and an 8-item list for specialised PC needs. The content and face validity were deemed to be acceptable by both the expert and the target populations. Conclusion This instrument makes a significant contribution to the identification of patients with palliative care needs as it has been designed to differentiate between general and specialised palliative care needs. Moreover, diagnostic data is not fundamental to the use of the instrument, thus facilitating its use by healthcare professionals other than physicians, in particular nurses. Internal and criterion validity assessments are ongoing and essential before wider dissemination of the instrument.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Gao ◽  
Martin Gulliford ◽  
Myfanwy Morgan ◽  
Irene J Higginson

Abstract Background End of life(EoL) care becomes more complex and increasingly takes place in the community, but there is little data on the use of general practice(GP) services to guide care improvement. This study aims to determine the trends and factors associated with GP consultation, prescribing and referral to other care services amongst cancer patients in the last year of life. Methods A retrospective cohort study of cancer patients who died in 2000-2014, based on routinely collected primary care data(the Clinical Practice Research DataLink, CPRD) covering a representative sample of the population in the United Kingdom. Outcome variables were number of GP consultations(primary), number of prescriptions and referral to other care services(yes vs no) in the last year of life. Explanatory variables included socio-demographics, clinical characteristics and the status of palliative care needs recognised or not. The association between outcome and explanatory variables were evaluated using multiple-adjusted risk ratio(aRR). Results Of 68,523 terminal cancer patients, 70% were aged 70+, 75% had comorbidities and 45.5% had palliative care needs recognised. In the last year of life, a typical cancer patient had 43 GP consultations(Standard deviation(SD): 31.7; total=3,031,734), 71.5 prescriptions(SD: 68.0; total=5,074,178), and 21(SD: 13.0) different drugs; 58.0% of patients had at least one referral covering all main clinical specialities. More comorbid conditions, prostate cancer and having palliative care needs recognised were associated with more primary care consultations, more prescriptions and a higher chance of referral(aRRs 1.07-2.03). Increasing age was related to fewer consultations(aRRs 0.77-0.96), less prescriptions(aRR 1.09-1.44), and a higher chance of referral(aRRs 1.08-1.16) but less likely to have palliative care needs recognised(aRRs 0.53-0.89). Conclusions GPs are very involved in end of life care of cancer patients, most of whom having complex care needs, i.e. older age, comorbidity and polypharmacy. This highlights the importance of enhancing primary palliative care skills among GPs and the imperative of greater integration of primary care with other healthcare professionals including oncologists, palliative care specialists, geriatricians and pharmacists. Research into the potential of deprescribing is warranted. Older patients have poorer access to both primary care and palliative care need to be addressed in future practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document