scholarly journals Critical care in the emergency department: monitoring the critically ill patient

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 561-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Andrews
1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Jastremski ◽  
Ronald J. Lagoe

AbstractThis study describes a series of mechanisms to alleviate overcrowding of hospital emergency departments by distributing critically ill patients among facilities with available resources. The initial mechanism, which was based on the availability of critical care beds, was used successfully between 1982 and 1986, but had to be abandoned when several new factors caused the availability of emergency department resources to become the limiting factor. A second approach, based on the availability of critical care and emergency department resources, produced limited success over a one-year period. The system currently in use, implemented in 1989, includes a distribution system based on the availability of emergency department resources and critical care beds, as well as a mechanism for diversion of ambulances to hospitals in neighboring counties at times of extremely high utilization. This experience demonstrates that mechanisms for planning the distribution of emergency and critically ill patients have universal applicability.


Author(s):  
Rachel J. Kwon

This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in surgical critical care. Does early tracheostomy reduce mortality in ventilated critically ill patients? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case on discussing the option of a tracheostomy with the family of a critically ill patient.


Author(s):  
Laura Flutter ◽  
Christoph Melzer-Gartzke ◽  
Claudia Spies ◽  
Julian Bion

The safe transport of critically ill patients is recognized internationally as a key competency for clinicians working in anaesthesia, critical care, and emergency medicine. This includes inter- and intra-hospital, land, and air transport. The centralization of specialist services and growing demand for critical care beds have increased pressure on hospitals to provide transfer support for critically ill patients. A variety of systems have emerged to facilitate the increasing need for both inter- and intra-hospital transfer of patients, ranging from a national coordinated retrieval service to the ad hoc utilization of on-call teams. The potential for complications during all types of transfer has been well documented. In order to improve safety, a number of national guidelines and courses have been developed to provide a standardized approach to transfer medicine. This chapter reviews the current literature on the subject and provides a summary of best practice for the transfer of the critically ill patient.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-228
Author(s):  
María C. Arango-Granados ◽  
Luis A. Bustamante Cristancho ◽  
Virginia Zarama Córdoba

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Dupuis ◽  
Jorge Miranda-Massari

Critically ill patients often have or develop conditions that make them susceptible to seizures and epilepsy. Treatment frequently involves the use of anticonvulsants. In order to use these effectively, the critical care nurse must be aware of the indications and controversies surrounding their use, the pathophysiologic conditions that impact on the disposition, and appropriate dosing and monitoring of these agents in the critical care setting


2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-Hui Fu ◽  
Yin-Ru Chen ◽  
Ju-Shin Fan ◽  
Yen-Chia Chen ◽  
Hsien-Hao Huang ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. A1161
Author(s):  
Ryan James ◽  
Akash Patel ◽  
Deepa Raghavan ◽  
Emily Kocurek

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117863372095207
Author(s):  
Alexander H Flannery ◽  
Drayton A Hammond ◽  
Douglas R Oyler ◽  
Chenghui Li ◽  
Adrian Wong ◽  
...  

Introduction: Critically ill patients and their pharmacokinetics present complexities often not considered by consensus guidelines from the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Prior surveys have suggested discordance between certain guideline recommendations and reported infectious disease pharmacist practice. Vancomycin dosing practices, including institutional considerations, have not previously been well described in the critically ill patient population. Objectives: To evaluate critical care pharmacists’ self-reported vancomycin practices in comparison to the 2009 guideline recommendations and other best practices identified by the study investigators. Methods: An online survey developed by the Research and Scholarship Committee of the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology (CPP) Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) was sent to pharmacist members of the SCCM CPP Section practicing in adult intensive care units in the spring of 2017. This survey queried pharmacists’ self-reported practices regarding vancomycin dosing and monitoring in critically ill adults. Results: Three-hundred and sixty-four responses were received for an estimated response rate of 26%. Critical care pharmacists self-reported largely following the 2009 vancomycin dosing and monitoring guidelines. The largest deviations in guideline recommendation compliance involve consistent use of a loading dose, dosing weight in obese patients, and quality improvement efforts related to systematically monitoring vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity. Variation exists regarding pharmacist protocols and other practices of vancomycin use in critically ill patients. Conclusion: Among critical care pharmacists, reported vancomycin practices are largely consistent with the 2009 guideline recommendations. Variations in vancomycin dosing and monitoring protocols are identified, and rationale for guideline non-adherence with loading doses elucidated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document