Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: identifying low risk patients

Gut ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 1641.1-1641
Author(s):  
Richard F A Logan ◽  
Sarah Hearnshaw ◽  
Derek Lowe ◽  
Simon P L Travis ◽  
M Stephen Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of the Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring System in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omid Shadkam ◽  
Ali Bahari ◽  
Mohammadreza Farzanehfar ◽  
Ali Beheshti Namdar ◽  
Mitra Ahadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

- There are disagreements about the diagnostic value of the current risk stratification systems in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The present study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in UGIB patients. This study was conducted on 182 patients with UGIB who underwent endoscopy in the Emergency Department of Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) of each patient was estimated by using the clinical and laboratory parameters. The relationship between Blatchford score and endoscopic findings was assessed. Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of GBS were measured based on high- and low-risk patients. According to the results, GBS had a high sensitivity (90.9%), specificity (79%), as well as positive (76%), and negative predictive values (92.2%). However, no significant relationship was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and re-bleeding. As the findings of the present study indicated, GlasgowBlatchford was a good predictive method for the determination of the high-risk and low-risk patients with UGIB. Nevertheless, this method showed poor performance in the prediction of re-bleeding.

scholarly journals Semiautomated Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score helps direct bed placement for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000479
Author(s):  
Drew B Schembre ◽  
Robson E Ely ◽  
Janice M Connolly ◽  
Kunjali T Padhya ◽  
Rohit Sharda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Transfusion Requirement ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Bleeding Score ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

ObjectiveThe Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS) was designed to identify patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who do not require hospitalisation. It may also help stratify patients unlikely to benefit from intensive care.DesignWe reviewed patients assigned a GBS in the emergency room (ER) via a semiautomated calculator. Patients with a score ≤7 (low risk) were directed to an unmonitored bed (UMB), while those with a score of ≥8 (high risk) were considered for MB placement. Conformity with guidelines and subsequent transfers to MB were reviewed, along with transfusion requirement, rebleeding, length of stay, need for intervention and death.ResultsOver 34 months, 1037 patients received a GBS in the ER. 745 had an UGIB. 235 (32%) of these patients had a GBS ≤7. 29 (12%) low-risk patients were admitted to MBs. Four low-risk patients admitted to UMB required transfer to MB within the first 48 hours. Low-risk patients admitted to UMBs were no more likely to die, rebleed, need transfusion or require more endoscopic, radiographic or surgical procedures than those admitted to MBs. No low-risk patient died from GIB. Patients with GBS ≥8 were more likely to rebleed, require transfusion and interventions to control bleeding but not to die.ConclusionA semiautomated GBS calculator can be incorporated into an ER workflow. Patients with a GBS ≤7 are unlikely to need MB care for UGIB. Further studies are warranted to determine an ideal scoring system for MB admission.

scholarly journals Increasing the low-risk threshold for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective, multicentre feasibility study

2021 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2021-101851
Author(s):  
Philip Dunne ◽  
Victoria Livie ◽  
Aaron McGowan ◽  
Wilson Siu ◽  
Sardar Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Risk Threshold ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Rebleeding Rate ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal ◽  
Related Mortality

ObjectiveDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, we extended the low-risk threshold for patients not requiring inpatient endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) 0–1 to GBS 0–3. We studied the safety and efficacy of this change.MethodsBetween 1 April 2020 and 30 June 2020 we prospectively collected data on consecutive unselected patients with UGIB at five large Scottish hospitals. Primary outcomes were length of stay, 30-day mortality and rebleeding. We compared the results with prospective prepandemic descriptive data.Results397 patients were included, and 284 index endoscopies were performed. 26.4% of patients had endoscopic intervention at index endoscopy. 30-day all-cause mortality was 13.1% (53/397), and 33.3% (23/69) for pre-existing inpatients. Bleeding-related mortality was 5% (20/397). 30-day rebleeding rate was 6.3% (25/397). 84 patients had GBS 0–3, of whom 19 underwent inpatient endoscopy, 0 had rebleeding and 2 died. Compared with prepandemic data in three centres, there was a fall in mean number of UGIB presentations per week (19 vs 27.8; p=0.004), higher mean GBS (8.3 vs 6.5; p<0.001) with fewer GBS 0–3 presentations (21.5% vs 33.3%; p=0.003) and higher all-cause mortality (12.2% vs 6.8%; p=0.02). Predictors of mortality were cirrhosis, pre-existing inpatient status, age >70 and confirmed COVID-19. 14 patients were COVID-19 positive, 5 died but none from UGIB.ConclusionDuring the pandemic when services were under severe pressure, extending the low-risk threshold for UGIB inpatient endoscopy to GBS 0–3 appears safe. The higher mortality of patients with UGIB during the pandemic is likely due to presentation of a fewer low-risk patients.

Cimetidine and antacid prophylaxis of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in high risk patients

1981 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Basso ◽  
Maurizio Bagarani ◽  
Alberto Materia ◽  
Silvana Fiorani ◽  
Paolo Lunardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Efficacy and safety of an early discharge protocol in low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

1998 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Moreno ◽  
Eduardo Jaurrieta ◽  
Humberto Aranda ◽  
Juan Fabregat ◽  
Leandro Farran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Discharge Protocol ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

scholarly journals LO25: Use of Glasgow Blatchford Score, time to endoscopy, and proton pump inhibitor use in patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding to the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S16
Author(s):  
S. Sandha ◽  
J. Stach ◽  
M. Bullard ◽  
B. Halloran ◽  
H. Blain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitor ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). Early endoscopy within 24 hours has been shown to reduce re-bleeding rates and lower mortality. However, low-risk patients can often be managed through outpatient follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare the timing and appropriateness of endoscopy and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use in a tertiary care ED setting for low- and high-risk patients determined using the Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS). Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted to examine the management of patients presenting with an UGIB in 2016 to the University of Alberta Hospital ED. TANDEM and Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) databases were used to identify patients using specific ICD-10 codes and the CEDIS presenting complaints of vomiting blood or blood in stool/melena. Patients with GBS 0-3 were categorized as low-risk and those with GBS &gt; 3 were considered high-risk with appropriateness of and time to endoscopy, disposition of patient at 24 hours, and use of PPIs determined for each group. Results: A total of 400 patients were included. A total of 319/400 patients (80%) underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). EGD was performed within 24 hours in 37% of patients (29/78) with GBS 0 to 3 and in 77% (248/322) with GBS greater than 3. Of the remaining high-risk patients, 11% (36/322) underwent EGD after 24 hours and 12% (38/322) did not undergo EGD. The endoscopic diagnoses were peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in 41% of patients (130/319), esophagitis in 18% (56/319), and varices in 14% (45/319). PPIs (data available 375/400) were administered (mainly intravenously) to 93% (279/300) of high-risk and 79% (59/75) of low-risk patients. Data on patient disposition showed 60/322 (19%) high-risk patients were discharged from the ED within 24 hours and only 31/60 (52%) of these underwent EGD before discharge. Of 29 low-risk patients undergoing EGD within 24 hours, 9 (31%) were admitted, 17 (59%) were discharged from ED, and 3 (10%) were kept for observation in the ED greater than 24 hours. Of low-risk patients, 76% (59/78) were discharged from the ED within 24 hours. Conclusion: A majority of patients presenting with UGIB appropriately received endoscopy within 24 hours. 19% of high-risk patients were discharged from the ED. Earlier discharge for low-risk patients can be improved as only 76% of low-risk patients were discharged from the ED within 24 hours. As expected, PPI use was high in these patients.

scholarly journals Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and use of NSAIDs in the etiopathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sokic-Milutinovic ◽  
M.N. Krstic ◽  
D. Popovic ◽  
N.S. Mijalkovic ◽  
S. Djuranovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Aspirin Therapy ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Bleeding Lesion ◽  
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Introduction: Non-steroid antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection are two most important independent risk factors involved in the etiopathogenesis of gastroduodenal mucosal injury with a clear and critical role in both uncomplicated and complicated peptic ulcer disease. It is estimated that up to 90% of all peptic ulcers result from the effect of one or both of these factors. AIM: To determine the frequency of NSAIDs use and Hp infection in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients and methods: Study evaluated data from 500 patients in whom esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed following presentation in emergency unit with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Anamnestic data was collected together with detailed information on previous salicilates and/or NSAIDs use. Hp status was determined and anatomic localization of bleeding lesion was also registered. Results: Acute upper GIT bleading was caused solely by NSAIDs in 55 (11%), by aspirin in 66 (13.2%), while combined NSAID/aspirin therapy was identified in 19 (3.8%) of patients. In total NSAID and/or aspirin use were diagnosed in 139 (27.8%). while in 122 (24.4%) only Hp infection was diagnosed. Both risk factors were identified in 144 (28.8%) patients (Hp+NSAIDs in 12.2%, Hp+aspirin in 10.8% and Hp+aspirin+NSAIDs in 5.8%) . In 19.8% of the cases (14% of males and 27% of females) neither NSAID/aspirin use nor presence of Hp infection was noted. Out of 500 patients enrolled, 63% were mails. In females, bleeding lesion was most frequently localized in gastric mucosa, while males had equal chance of bleeding from either gastric or duodenal mucosa. Fortunately, only 5 to 7% of patients were bleeding from both gastric and duodenal lesion. Conclusion : Prevention of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding can be achieved trough strict and limited use of aspirin and NSAIDs, eradication of Hp infection and use of gastroprotective therapy in well-defined risk patients that need chronic NSAIDs and/or aspirin therapy. In all patients starting long-term NSAID and/or aspirin therapy and all patients already on long-term aspirin therapy test and treat strategy for Hp infection should be used. On the other hand, only in high risk patients (more than 65 years, history of peptic ulcer disease, concomitant corticosteroid, aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin therapy) already on chronic NSAID therapy long-term PPI therapy should be prescribed after testing and treating of Hp infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document