scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 infection in acute pancreatitis increases disease severity and 30-day mortality: COVID PAN collaborative study

Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2020-323364
Author(s):  
Sanjay Pandanaboyana ◽  
John Moir ◽  
John S Leeds ◽  
Kofi Oppong ◽  
Aditya Kanwar ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThere is emerging evidence that the pancreas may be a target organ of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) and coexistent SARS-CoV-2 infection.DesignA prospective international multicentre cohort study including consecutive patients admitted with AP during the current pandemic was undertaken. Primary outcome measure was severity of AP. Secondary outcome measures were aetiology of AP, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospital stay, local complications, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), persistent organ failure and 30-day mortality. Multilevel logistic regression was used to compare the two groups.Results1777 patients with AP were included during the study period from 1 March to 23 July 2020. 149 patients (8.3%) had concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were older male patients and more likely to develop severe AP and ARDS (p<0.001). Unadjusted analysis showed that SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with AP were more likely to require ICU admission (OR 5.21, p<0.001), local complications (OR 2.91, p<0.001), persistent organ failure (OR 7.32, p<0.001), prolonged hospital stay (OR 1.89, p<0.001) and a higher 30-day mortality (OR 6.56, p<0.001). Adjusted analysis showed length of stay (OR 1.32, p<0.001), persistent organ failure (OR 2.77, p<0.003) and 30-day mortality (OR 2.41, p<0.04) were significantly higher in SARS-CoV-2 co-infection.ConclusionPatients with AP and coexistent SARS-CoV-2 infection are at increased risk of severe AP, worse clinical outcomes, prolonged length of hospital stay and high 30-day mortality.

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 3545
Author(s):  
Noor Mohammed Shawnas Bhanou ◽  
Gayatri Balachandran ◽  
Nisha B. Jain

Background: The management of Acute Pancreatitis (AP) is determined by an accurate assessment of severity of the disease. Numerous severity indicators have been described till date, most of which require reassessment after admission and resuscitation. We propose a novel indicator, the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as a predictor of severity of acute pancreatitis at the initial time of diagnosis. NLR may have a role in predicting the length of hospital stay and ICU admission and also to predict adverse manifestations of Severe Acute Pancreatitis (SAP) including organ failure.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 107 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis based on Atlanta 2012 definitions, who were admitted and treated between August 2017 and November 2017. The patients were grouped according to severity of acute pancreatitis and organ failure occurrence and a comparative analysis was performed to compare the NLR between groups. NLR was also compared with the modified Marshall score as a standard predictor of organ failure in acute pancreatitis.Results: Median NLR among the severe group is significantly higher compared to mild and moderate group (P <0.001). NLR significantly correlated with length of hospital stay (p 0.004) and also had a statistically significant correlation with ICU stay (p < 0.001). We found in our study that NLR at admission correlated significantly with the modified Marshall score in predicting the organ failure (p <0.001) in patients with acute pancreatitis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed a cut-off values of NLR >8.5 at admission correlated with adverse outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis.Conclusions: Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be used as a predictor of severity of acute pancreatitis, right at the time of initial diagnosis. Further it may predict adverse outcomes, need for ICU care as well as length of hospital stay. NLR can be used as a tool to refer at risk patients to tertiary center needing ICU admission.


2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (192) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paleswan Joshi Lakhey ◽  
Ramesh Singh Bhandari ◽  
Brindeshwori Kafle ◽  
Keshaw Prasad Singh ◽  
Mahesh Khakurel

Introduction: Severe acute pancreatitis, according to Atlanta classification, is a heterogeneous group of patients with different outcomes. The patients with local complications and without organ failure have better outcome. This study has been conducted to determine the proportion of moderately severe acute pancreatitis and validate this subgroup in our population of patients.Methods: A total of 172 patients with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were categorized into three groups according to presence or absence of local complications and organ failure as mild acute pancreatitis, moderately severe acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis and were compared in terms of need for intensive care unit care, length of ICU stay, need for intervention, length of hospital stay and mortality.Results: Fifty seven (33%) were categorized as moderately severe acute pancreatitis. Need for ICU care (19.3% vs 100%, p < 0.001), length of ICU stay (1 vs 9.8 days, p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (8.3±3.7 vs 16.6±8.1 days, p < 0.001) and mortality (0% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001) between moderately severe acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis was significantly different. Moreover, mild acute pancreatitis and moderately severe acute pancreatitis had no mortality.Conclusions: This study showed that moderately severe acute pancreatitis exists as a separate group different from mild acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis with no mortality as in mild acute pancreatitis. Keywords: moderately severe acute pancreatitis; Atlanta classification; outcome. 


JGH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 684-691
Author(s):  
Tao Jin ◽  
Lan Li ◽  
Lihui Deng ◽  
Si Wen ◽  
Ruwen Zhang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. A-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Lizarraga ◽  
Isabel Pascual ◽  
Gemma Pacheco ◽  
Ramon Añon ◽  
Rosana Villagrasa ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 2221
Author(s):  
Yogesh Kumar Bung ◽  
Chandrasekhar Sharanappa Neeralagi ◽  
Lakkanna Suggaiah ◽  
Usharani Rathnam ◽  
Chandrakant Kesari

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is as an inflammation of the pancreas with varied range of complication like peri-pancreatic collection, pancreatic necrosis, renal failure, multi-organ dysfunction syndrome which increases mortality rate and morbidity. Majority of AP cases are mild but severe cases of AP are associated with increased complication and mortality. BISAP is simple bedside prognostic scoring system for predicting severity of AP. BISAP is a collection of simple routine investigation and scores are quantified at 24hours of onset of AP. This study aims to assess prognosis of AP cases at ESIC Medical college and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.Methods: A prospective study of 60 Patients who were diagnosed as AP according to RAC. All patients were admitted in high dependency unit with close observation of vital parameters and investigations were done at 24 hours of onset of AP. BISAP score >3 was considered as Severe Acute Pancreatitis, its correlation with local complications, organ failure, ICU stay and Mortality was studied. Statistical analysis done using Chi-square test and Fisher Exact test for local complications and organ failure using xL Stat and SPSS v.21.0, a p-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.Results: Of the 60 patients, BISAP score was >3 and <3 in 15 and 45 patients respectively. Alcohol was the most common cause of acute pancreatitis, accounting for 53.33%. In current study 12 (20%) patients developed organ failure and among them 9 (75%) had transient organ failure and 3 (25%) had persistent organ failure. Total 8 (13%) patients had developed pancreatic necrosis and among them 6 had BISAP >3. Mortality rate in this study was 2%.Conclusions: The BISAP score is a simple and fairly accurate method for the early identification of patients at increased risk for in hospital mortality and to identify patients at risk of the development of intermediate markers of severity and organ failure within 24 hours of presentation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Maria Morosini ◽  
Greta Rosso ◽  
Guido Merlotti ◽  
Andrea Colombatto ◽  
Angelo Nappo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims In 2020, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a devastating impact on individuals and on national health systems worldwide. Although being primarily a lung disease, COVID-19-associated systemic inflammation and activation of coagulation/complement cascades lead to multiple organ dysfunction including Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Our aim is to evaluate AKI prevalence and mortality in hospitalized patients during COVID-19 pandemic in a 500-bed University Hospital. Method Observational study on 945 COVID-19 patients (March-May 2020). Data collection from Board Hospital Discharge and serum creatinine (Lab database). AKI stratification in accordance to KDIGO criteria and evaluation of outcome in the different subgroups. The same methodology was adopted to assess AKI prevalence and outcome in 2018-2019. Results 351/945 (37.14%) of all hospital admissions for COVID-19 showed AKI further sub-classified as follows: 173 (18.3%) stage 1, 112 (11.9%) stage 2 and 66 (6.9%) stage 3: the control NO AKI group was 594/945 (62.86%). COVID-associated AKI prevalence was higher than that observed in 2018 (total AKI 17.9%, stage 1 10.7%, stage 2 4.5%, stage 3 2.7%) and 2019 (total AKI 17.2%, stage 1 10.1%, stage 2 4.5%, stage 3 2.6%). During COVID-19 pandemic, in-hospital mortality was 27% for NO AKI group, 28% for total AKI group, further subdivided 24% for stage 1, 45% for stage 2 and 42% for stage 3 group, respectively. Mortality was different from that observed during 2018 (NO AKI 3.77%, total AKI 15.2%, stage 1 9.69%, stage 2 17.24%, stage 3 18.9%) and 2019 (NO AKI 3.56%, total AKI 18.35%, stage 1 10.6%, stage 2 20.1%, stage 3 24.3%). In COVID-19 patients, mean age of NO AKI group was 64.6 ys vs. 71.7 ys of total AKI group divided in 71.6 ys for stage 1, 74.3 ys for stage 2 and 67.9 ys for stage 3, respectively. Mean eGFR at admission was 74.2 ml/min for NO AKI group, 61.3 ml/min for total AKI group divided in 64.3 ml/min for stage 1, 57.8 ml/min for stage 2 and 52.5 ml/min for stage 3. Mean serum creatinine at admission was 1.17 mg/dl in NO AKI group, 1.43 mg/dl for total AKI group divided in1.22 mg/dl for stage 1, 1.4 mg/dl for stage 2 and 2.25 mg/dl for stage 3. Among evaluated comorbidities, only diabetes (p=0,048) and cognitive impairment (p=0,001) were associated with a significant increased risk for AKI development. ICU admission rate was 5% for NO AKI group and 18% for total AKI group divided in 14% for stage 1, 22% for stage 2 and 44% for stage 3. Mean length of hospital stay for NO AKI group was 7.22 days vs 15.08 days for total AKI group divided in 13.67 for stage 1, 15.83 for stage 2 and 21.82 for stage 3. Of note, all different therapies administered to COVID-19 patients did not correlate with AKI incidence. Mean eGFR at discharge was 76 ml/min for NO AKI group vs 66 ml/min for total AKI group divided in 68.7 ml/min for stage 1, 59.3 ml/min for stage 2 and 59.3 ml/min for stage 3. Mean serum creatinine at discharge was 1.14 mg/dl for NO AKI group vs 1.45 mg/dl for total AKI group divided in 1.28 mg/dl for stage 1, 1.58 mg/dl for stage 2 and 2.05 mg/dl for stage 3. Conclusion COVID-19 pandemic is associated with an increased AKI prevalence in hospitalized patients (2-fold increase in all KDIGO stages). AKI associated with an increased risk of mortality: of note, AKI stage2-3 had a strong impact on mortality in comparison to NO AKI group (OR 2.59 and 2.11, respectively). The presence of eGFR &gt;60 ml/min and serum creatinine &lt; 1.2 mg/dl at admission were associated with a lower risk of AKI development: reduced eGFR levels were observed at discharge particularly in AKI stage 2-3. The length of hospital stay and risk of ICU admission depended on AKI incidence and severity. COVID-19 lead to an increased burden for Nephrologists due to increased AKI prevalence: a nephrological follow-up is needed to avoid progression from AKI to chronic kidney disease (CKD).


Author(s):  
M. A. W. Habets ◽  
H. N. Sturkenboom ◽  
R. A. Tio ◽  
E. Belfroid ◽  
J. Hoogervorst-Schilp ◽  
...  

Abstract Background COVID-19 can cause myocardial injury in a significant proportion of patients admitted to the hospital and seems to be associated with worse prognosis. The aim of this review was to study how often and to what extent COVID-19 causes myocardial injury and whether this is an important contributor to outcome with implications for management. Methods A literature search was performed in Medline and Embase. Myocardial injury was defined as elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) levels with at least one value > 99th percentile of the upper reference limit. The primary outcome measure was mortality, whereas secondary outcome measures were intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of hospital stay. Results Four studies and one review were included. The presence of myocardial injury varied between 9.6 and 46.3%. Myocardial injury was associated with a higher mortality rate (risk ratio (RR) 5.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.48–8.80) and more ICU admissions (RR 3.78, 95% CI 2.07–6.89). The results regarding length of hospital stay were inconclusive. Conclusion Patients with myocardial injury might be classified as high-risk patients, with probably a higher mortality rate and a larger need for ICU admission. cTn levels can be used in risk stratification models and can indicate which patients potentially benefit from early medication administration. We recommend measuring cTn levels in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital or who deteriorate during admission.


Author(s):  
Dr. Shefali Mehta ◽  
Dr. Shuchi Goyal ◽  
Dr. Rajendra Triloki ◽  
Dr. A. K. Verma

Introduction: The research emphasises on the association bond of Serum Albumin Level used as a marker for diagnosis of Persistent Organ Failure in Acute Pancreatitis. Material and Methods: The samples for the study were collected from the central lab, out-patient department and in-patient department of Department of Biochemistry, adult patients suffering from Acute Pancreatitis correlated to tropical medicinal stream and Gastroenterology Rabindranath Tagore Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan  The research was carried out on a total of 100 patients for  1 year  which  were satisfying   Atlanta criteria  for Acute Pancreatitis will be diagnosed based on the following symptoms; elevated serum amylase, and lipase levels, that is greater than the normal limit, findings associated with the characteristics of the radiological findings. Also, with the abdominal computerized ultrasonography and tomography Results: In the present research, albumin always descends obviously in AP patients with POF (p < 0.05). The AUC under ROC line is 0.869. Albumin has been proved as an excellent marker of POF in AP. However, no previous study has researched into the association between albumin and incidence of POF in AP. Therefore, this study is the first time to show that the reduction of serum albumin is significantly associated with increased risk of POF in AP. Conclusion: Thus it can be concluded that serum albumin on admission is independently associated with POF in AP. The study suggests that albumin is a valuable tool for a rapid assessment of POF in patients with AP. Keywords: Serum Albumin, Persistent Organ Failure, Acute Pancreatitis


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S19-S20
Author(s):  
José Antonio Díaz-Peromingo ◽  
Paula María Pesqueira-Fontán ◽  
Marina Iglesias-Gallego ◽  
Sonia Molinos-Castro ◽  
Juan Saborido-Froján ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document