scholarly journals STANDARDIZATION OF METHODS OF MEASURING THE ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE: A JOINT REPORT OF THE COMMITTEES APPOINTED BY THE CARDIAC SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND AND THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION.

Heart ◽  
1939 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-855
Author(s):  
ARTHUR J. MOSS

In 1967, an editorial entitled, "The Criterion for Diastolic Pressure: Revolution and Counterrevolution" appeared in a cardiology journal.1 The comments centered on deliberations of three committees appointed through the years by the American Heart Association. The charge of these committees was, among other things, to resolve the issue of whether the fourth phase of Korotkoff sounds (muffling) or the fifth phase (cessation) is the proper index of diastolic pressure. In 1939, the American Heart Association, together with the Cardiac Society of Great Britain and Ireland, recommended quite definitely that the fourth phase should be considered the index of diastolic pressure.2 REVOLUTION In 1951, a second committee of the American Heart Association reversed the recommendation of the 1939 International Committee and stated that the fifth phase was to be regarded as the more reliable index of diastolic pressure.3


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Sun Yu ◽  
Kwan Hong ◽  
Byung Chul Chun

Abstract Background The study aimed to estimate the incidence of and period of progression to stage 2 hypertension from normal blood pressure. Methods We selected a total of 21,172 normotensive individuals between 2003 and 2004 from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening and followed them up until 2015. The criteria for blood pressure were based on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 guideline (normal BP: SBP < 120 and DBP < 80 mmHg, elevated BP: SBP 120–129 and DBP < 80 mmHg, stage 1 hypertension: SBP 130–139 or DBP 80–89 mmHg, stage 2 hypertension: SBP ≥140 or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg). We classified the participants into four courses (Course A: normal BP → elevated BP → stage 1 hypertension→ stage 2 hypertension, Course B: normal BP → elevated BP → stage 2 hypertension, Course C: normal BP → stage 1 hypertension → stage 2 hypertension, Course D: normal BP → stage 2 hypertension) according to their progression from normal blood pressure to stage 2 hypertension. Results During the median 12.23 years of follow-up period, 52.8% (n= 11,168) and 23.6% (n=5004) of the participants had stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension, respectively. In particular, over 60 years old had a 2.8-fold higher incidence of stage 2 hypertension than 40–49 years old. After the follow-up period, 77.5% (n=3879) of participants with stage 2 hypertension were found to be course C (n= 2378) and D (n=1501). After the follow-up period, 77.5% (n=3879) of participants with stage 2 hypertension were found to be course C (n= 2378) and D (n=1501). The mean years of progression from normal blood pressure to stage 2 hypertension were 8.7±2.6 years (course A), 6.1±2.9 years (course B), 7.5±2.8 years (course C) and 3.2±2.0 years, respectively. Conclusions This study found that the incidence of hypertension is associated with the progression at each stage. We suggest that the strategies necessary to prevent progression to stage 2 hypertension need to be set differently for each target course.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document