Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: an evolution toward targeted therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1619-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis A Voutsadakis

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and its high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma counterpart differ in their precursor lesions, molecular profile, natural history, and response to therapies. As such, low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma needs to be studied separately from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, despite challenges stemming from its rarity. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and the most common molecular defects and pathways involved in the carcinogenesis of the ovarian epithelium from normal to serous borderline ovarian tumors to low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma will help develop better therapies. By adopting targeted approaches there may be an opportunity to integrate novel therapies without the need for robust numbers in clinical trials. This manuscript will discuss low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and focus on the arising treatments being developed with an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease.

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 972-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enzo Ricciardi ◽  
Thaïs Baert ◽  
Beyhan Ataseven ◽  
Florian Heitz ◽  
Sonia Prader ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the early 2000s a two-tier grading system was introduced for serous ovarian cancer. Since then, we have increasingly come to accept that low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a separate entity with a unique mutational landscape and clinical behaviour. As less than 10% of serous carcinomas of the ovary are low-grade, they are present in only a small number of patients in clinical trials for ovarian cancer. Therefore the current treatment of LGSOC is based on smaller trials, retrospective series, and subgroup analysis of large clinical trials on ovarian cancer. Surgery plays a major role in the treatment of patients with LGSOC. In the systemic treatment of LGSOC, hormonal treatment and targeted therapies seem to play an important role.


2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-001473
Author(s):  
Paola Romeo ◽  
Damiano Arciuolo ◽  
Maria Cristina Moruzzi ◽  
Francesca Moro

We present a video showing two cases of serous epithelial ovarian carcinomas. The first video shows clinical, ultrasound, macroscopic, and histological features of a patient with high grade serous ovarian carcinoma. The second video presents clinical, ultrasound, macroscopic, and histological features of a patient with low grade serous ovarian carcinoma.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Hanafy Meleis ◽  
Amany Abdelbary Abdellatif ◽  
Ahmed Mohammed Samy El-Agwany

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix319-ix320
Author(s):  
S. Ayers ◽  
T.T. Tun ◽  
N. Mescallado ◽  
A. Wright ◽  
D.G.R. Evans ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Hyeok Kang ◽  
Yen-Ling Lai ◽  
Wen-Fang Cheng ◽  
Hyun-Soo Kim ◽  
Kuan-Ting Kuo ◽  
...  

AbstractLow-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (LGSOC) has clinical features different from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) accounting for the majority of epithelial ovarian cancer. Because of its rarity, previous studies have only focused on the high-grade disease without considering the differences between the two subtypes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the clinical prognostic factors known for HGSOC on survival in patients with LGSOC. Based on the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, progression-free survival (PFS) was markedly decreased in advanced disease compared with early disease. For stage I, patients with stage IC had poorer survival than those with stage IA and IB regardless of the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. For advanced disease, no gross residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery was significantly associated with longer PFS when compared with gross residual disease. In multivariate analysis for PFS and overall survival (OS), age, preoperative CA-125, time interval from surgery to chemotherapy, and the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with prognosis. Complete cytoreduction was the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR 2.45, p = 0.045). Our study revealed that the known prognostic factors in HGSOC did not show any effect on the survival in LGSOC except for FIGO stage and complete cytoreduction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Alisa Villert ◽  
Larisa Kolomiets ◽  
Natalya Yunusova ◽  
Yevgeniya Fesik

High-grade ovarian carcinoma is a histopathological diagnosis, however, at the molecular level, ovarian cancer represents a heterogeneous group of diseases. Studies aimed at identifying molecular genetic subtypes of ovarian cancer are conducted in order to find the answer to the question: can different molecular subgroups influence the choice of treatment? One of the achievements in this trend is the recognition of the dualistic model that categorizes various types of ovarian cancer into two groups designated high-grade (HG) and low-grade (LG) tumors. However, the tumor genome sequencing data suggest the existence of 6 ovarian carcinoma subtypes, including two LG and four HG subtypes. Subtype C1 exhibits a high stromal response and the lowest survival. Subtypes C2 and C4 demonstrate higher number of intratumoral CD3 + cells, lower stromal gene expression and better survival than sybtype C1. Subtype C5 (mesenchymal) is characterized by mesenchymal cells, over-expression of N-cadherin and P-cadherin, low expression of differentiation markers, and lower survival rates than C2 and C4. The use of a consensus algorithm to determine the subtype allows identification of only a minority of ovarian carcinomas (approximately 25%) therefore, the practical importance of this classification requires additional research. There is evidence that it makes sense to randomize tumors into groups with altered expression of angiogenic genes and groups with overexpression of the immune response genes, as in the angiogenic group there is a comparative superiority in terms of survival. The administration of bevacizumab in the angiogenic group improves survival, while the administration of bevacizumab in the immune group even worsens the outcome. Molecular subtypes with worse survival rates (proliferative and mesenchymal) also benefit most from bevacizumab treatment. This review focuses on some of the advances in understanding molecular, cellular, and genetic changes in ovarian carcinomas with the results achieved so far regarding the formulation of molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer, however further studies are needed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
C. Morse ◽  
B. Norquist ◽  
S. Bernards ◽  
M. Harrell ◽  
K. Agnew ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document