Open invitation to define a global research agenda for violence and injury prevention

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-218
2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. E Ebel ◽  
M. H. Medina ◽  
A K M F. Rahman ◽  
N. J. Appiah ◽  
F. P Rivara

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Villaveces ◽  
A. Christiansen ◽  
S. W. Hargarten

Author(s):  
Ryoma Kayano ◽  
Shuhei Nomura ◽  
Jonathan Abrahams ◽  
Qudsia Huda ◽  
Emily Y. Y. Chan ◽  
...  

In response to the increasing burden of recent health emergencies and disasters, the World Health Organization (WHO) and its partners established the WHO thematic platform for health emergency and disaster risk management research network (health EDRM RN) in 2016, with the purposes of promoting global research collaboration among various stakeholders and enhancing research activities that generate evidence to manage health risks associated with all types of emergencies and disasters. With the strong support and involvement of all WHO regional offices, the health EDRM RN now works with more than 200 global experts and partners to implement its purposes. The 1st and 2nd Core Group Meetings of the health EDRM RN were held on 17–18 October 2019 and 27 November 2020, respectively, to discuss the development of a global research agenda that the health EDRM RN will focus on facilitating, promoting, synthesizing and implementing, taking into account the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (health EDRM RN research agenda). A focus of the meetings was the establishment of an online platform to share information and knowledge, including the databases that the health EDRM RN accumulates (WHO health EDRM knowledge hub). This paper presents a summary of the discussion results of the meetings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha T. Ndlovu-Teijema ◽  
Maarten O. Kok ◽  
Sabine L. van Elsland ◽  
Hilleen Smeets ◽  
David Barstow ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While leading AIDS organizations expect faith and health collaborations to play a crucial role in organizing and scaling up community-based HIV services, it is unclear how this can be realized. Little primary research has been conducted into which strategies for collaboration and service provision are most effective, efficient, scalable and sustainable. Seeking to align research with urgent needs, enhance coordination and increase the likelihood that results are used, this study aimed to set an inclusive global research agenda that reflects priority research questions from key stakeholders at the intersection of HIV healthcare and faith. Methods In order to develop this global research agenda, we drew from document analyses, focus group discussions, interviews with purposively selected key informants from all continents (policy-makers, healthcare providers, faith leaders, academics and HIV activists), an online questionnaire, and expert meetings at several global conferences. We carried out focus group discussions and interviews with faith leaders in South Africa. Other stakeholder focus groups and interviews were carried out online or in person in France, Switzerland, the Netherlands and South Africa, and virtual questionnaires were distributed to stakeholders worldwide. Respondents were purposively sampled. Results We interviewed 53 participants, and 110 stakeholders responded to the online questionnaire. The participants worked in 54 countries, with the majority having research experience (84%), experience with policy processes (73%) and/or experience as a healthcare provider (60%) and identifying as religious (79%). From interviews (N = 53) and questionnaires (N = 110), we identified 10 research themes: addressing sexuality, stigma, supporting specific populations, counselling and disclosure, agenda-setting, mobilizing and organizing funding, evaluating faith-health collaborations, advantage of faith initiatives, gender roles, and education. Respondents emphasized the need for more primary research and prioritized two themes: improving the engagement of faith communities in addressing sexuality and tackling stigma. Conclusions A wide range of respondents participated in developing the research agenda. To align research to the prioritized themes and ensure that results are used, it is essential to further engage key users, funders, researchers and other stakeholders, strengthen the capacity for locally embedded research and research uptake and contextualize priorities to diverse religious traditions, key populations and local circumstances.


Nature ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 540 (7631) ◽  
pp. 30-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Haddad ◽  
Corinna Hawkes ◽  
Patrick Webb ◽  
Sandy Thomas ◽  
John Beddington ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 809-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy E. Lawn ◽  
Igor Rudan ◽  
Craig Rubens

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Ndlovu-Teijema ◽  
Maarten O Kok ◽  
Sabine L van Elsland ◽  
Hilleen Smeets ◽  
David Barstow ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundWhile leading AIDS organisations expect faith and health collaborations to play a crucial role in organising and scaling up community-based HIV services, it is unclear how this can be realised. Little primary research has been conducted into which strategies for collaboration and service provision are most effective, efficient, scalable and sustainable. Seeking to align research with urgent needs, enhance coordination and increase the likelihood that results are used, this study aimed to set an inclusive global research agenda that reflects priority research questions from key stakeholders at the intersection of HIV healthcare and faith. MethodsIn order to develop this global research agenda, we drew from document analyses, focus group discussions, interviews with purposively selected key informants from all continents (policymakers, healthcare providers, faith leaders, academics and HIV activists), an online questionnaire, and expert meetings at several global conferences. ResultsParticipants worked in 54 countries, with the majority having research experience (84%), experience with policy processes (73%) and/or experience as a healthcare provider (60%) and identifying as religious (79%). From interviews (N=53) and questionnaires (N=110), we identified ten research themes: addressing sexuality, stigma, supporting specific populations, counselling and disclosure, agenda setting, mobilising and organising funding, evaluating faith-health collaborations, advantage of faith initiatives, gender roles, and education. Respondents emphasized the need for more primary research and prioritised two themes: improving the engagement of faith communities in addressing sexuality and tackling stigma. ConclusionsA wide range of respondents participated in developing the research agenda. To align research to the prioritised themes and ensure that results are used, it is essential to further engage key users, funders, researchers and other stakeholders, strengthen the capacity for locally embedded research and research uptake and contextualise priorities to diverse religious traditions, key populations and local circumstances. ­­


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document