028 Revascularization of large vessel occlusion by the Penumbra System in acute ischemic stroke contributes to good functional outcome

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
R Tarr ◽  
D Hsu ◽  
Z Kulcsar ◽  
C Bonvin ◽  
D Rufenacht ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 0271678X2199220
Author(s):  
Tobias D Faizy ◽  
Reza Kabiri ◽  
Soren Christensen ◽  
Michael Mlynash ◽  
Gabriella Kuraitis ◽  
...  

Ischemic lesion Net Water Uptake (NWU) quantifies cerebral edema formation and likely correlates with the microvascular perfusion status of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). We hypothesized that favorable tissue-level collaterals (TLC) predict less NWU and good functional outcomes. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of AIS-LVO patients who underwent thrombectomy triage. TLC were measured on cerebral perfusion studies using the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR; volume ratio of brain tissue with [Tmax > 10 sec/Tmax > 6 sec]); favorable TLC were regarded as HIR [Formula: see text] 0.4. NWU was determined using a quantitative densitometry approach on follow-up CT. Primary outcome was NWU. Secondary outcome was a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2). 580 patients met inclusion criteria. Favorable TLC ( β: 4.23, SE: 0.65; p < 0.001) predicted smaller NWU after treatment. Favorable TLC (OR: 2.35, [95% CI: 1.31–4.21]; p < 0.001), and decreased NWU (OR: 0.75, [95% CI: 0.70–0.79]; p < 0.001) predicted good functional outcome, while controlling for age, glucose, CTA collaterals, baseline NIHSS and good vessel reperfusion status. We conclude that favorable TLC predict less ischemic lesion NWU after treatment in AIS-LVO patients. Favorable TLC and decreased NWU were independent predictors of good functional outcome.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Garcia-Tornel ◽  
Matias Deck ◽  
Marc Ribo ◽  
David Rodriguez-Luna ◽  
Jorge Pagola ◽  
...  

Introduction: Perfusion imaging has emerged as an imaging tool to select patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) for endovascular treatment (EVT). We aim to compare an automated method to assess the infarct ischemic core (IC) in Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) with Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) imaging and its ability to predict functional outcome and final infarct volume (FIV). Methods: 494 patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with EVT were included. Volumetric assessment of IC in NCCT (eA-IC) was calculated using eASPECTS™ (Brainomix, Oxford). CTP was processed using availaible software considering CTP-IC as volume of Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) <30% comparing with the contralateral hemisphere. FIV was calculated in patients with complete recanalization using a semiautomated method with a NCCT performed 48-72 hours after EVT. Complete recanalization was considered as modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) ≥2B after EVT. Good functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin score (mRs) ≤2 at 90 days. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation between EA-IC and CTP-IC and its ability to predict prognosis and FIV. Results: Median eA-IC and CTP-IC were 16 (IQR 7-31) and 8 (IQR 0-28), respectively. 419 patients (85%) achieved complete recanalization, and their median FIV was 17.5cc (IQR 5-52). Good functional outcome was achieved in 230 patients (47%). EA-IC and CTP-IC had moderate correlation between them (r=0.52, p<0.01) and similar correlation with FIV (r=0.52 and 0.51, respectively, p<0.01). Using ROC curves, both methods had similar performance in its ability to predict good functional outcome (EA-IC AUC 0.68 p<0.01, CTP-IC AUC 0.66 p<0.01). Multivariate analysis adjusted by confounding factors showed that eA-IC and CTP-IC predicted good functional outcome (for every 10cc and >40cc, OR 1.5, IC1.3-1.8, p<0.01 and OR 1.3, IC1.1-1.5, p<0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Automated volumetric assessment of infarct core in NCCT has similar performance predicting prognosis and final infarct volume than CTP. Prospective studies should evaluate a NCCT-core / vessel occlusion penumbra missmatch as an alternative method to select patients for EVT.


Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 2842-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter H. Hinsenveld ◽  
Inger R. de Ridder ◽  
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge ◽  
Jan A. Vos ◽  
Adrien E. Groot ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with acute ischemic stroke because of large vessel occlusion involves complicated logistics, which may cause a delay in treatment initiation during off-hours. This might lead to a worse functional outcome. We compared workflow intervals between endovascular treatment–treated patients presenting during off- and on-hours. Methods— We retrospectively analyzed data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study in the Netherlands and included patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who presented between March 2014 and June 2016. Off-hours were defined as presentation on Monday to Friday between 17:00 and 08:00 hours, weekends (Friday 17:00 to Monday 8:00) and national holidays. Primary end point was first door to groin time. Secondary end points were functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale) and workflow time intervals. We stratified for transfer status, adjusted for prognostic factors, and used linear and ordinal regression models. Results— We included 1488 patients of which 936 (62.9%) presented during off-hours. Median first door to groin time was 140 minutes (95% CI, 110–182) during off-hours and 121 minutes (95% CI, 85–157) during on-hours. Adjusted first door to groin time was 14.6 minutes (95% CI, 9.3–20.0) longer during off-hours. Door to needle times for intravenous therapy were slightly longer (3.5 minutes, 95% CI, 0.7–6.3) during off-hours. Groin puncture to reperfusion times did not differ between groups. For transferred patients, the delay within the intervention center was 5.0 minutes (95% CI, 0.5–9.6) longer. There was no significant difference in functional outcome between patients presenting during off- and on-hours (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.14). Reperfusion rates and complication rates were similar. Conclusions— Presentation during off-hours is associated with a slight delay in start of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This treatment delay did not translate into worse functional outcome or increased complication rates.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1616-1619 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Beharry ◽  
Michael J. Waters ◽  
Roy Drew ◽  
John N. Fink ◽  
Duncan Wilson ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Reversal of dabigatran before intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been well described using alteplase but experience with intravenous tenecteplase is limited. Tenecteplase seems at least noninferior to alteplase in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. We report on the experience of dabigatran reversal before tenecteplase thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Methods— We included consecutive patients with ischemic stroke receiving dabigatran prestroke treated with intravenous tenecteplase after receiving idarucizumab. Patients were from 2 centers in New Zealand and Australia. We reported the clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and their functional outcome. Results— We identified 13 patients receiving intravenous tenecteplase after dabigatran reversal. Nine (69%) were male, median age was 79 (interquartile range, 69–85) and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 (interquartile range, 4–21). Atrial fibrillation was the indication for dabigatran therapy in all patients. All patients had a prolonged thrombin clotting time (median, 80 seconds [interquartile range, 57–113]). Seven patients with large vessel occlusion were referred for endovascular thrombectomy, 2 of these patients (29%) had early recanalization with tenecteplase abrogating thrombectomy. No patients had parenchymal hemorrhage or symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. Favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) occurred in 8 (62%) patients. Two deaths occurred from large territory infarction. Conclusions— Our experience suggests intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase following dabigatran reversal using idarucizumab may be safe in selected patients with acute ischemic stroke. Further studies are required to more precisely estimate the efficacy and risk of clinically significant hemorrhage.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Mirja M. Wirtz ◽  
Philipp Hendrix ◽  
Oded Goren ◽  
Lisa A. Beckett ◽  
Heather R. Dicristina ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEMechanical thrombectomy is the established treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). The authors sought to identify early predictors of a favorable outcome in stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.METHODSConsecutive patients with ischemic stroke due to LVO who underwent mechanical thrombectomy at a Comprehensive Stroke Center in the US between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, stroke and treatment characteristics, as well as functional outcome at 90 days were collected. Clinical predictors of 90-day functional outcome were assessed and compared to existing indices for prompt neurological improvement. Analyses of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were performed to estimate the optimal thresholds for absolute 24-hour and delta (change in) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores for functional outcome prediction.RESULTSA total of 156 patients (median age 71.5 years) underwent 159 mechanical thrombectomies. The M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery was the most frequent site of occlusion (57.2%). The median NIHSS score before thrombectomy was 18 (IQR 14–24). A postthrombectomy Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2B or 3 was achieved in 147 procedures (92.4%). The median NIHSS score 24 hours after thrombectomy was 14 (IQR 6–22). Good functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was achieved in 37 thrombectomies (23.9%). An absolute 24-hour NIHSS score ≤ 10 (OR 25.929, 95% CI 8.448–79.582, p < 0.001) and a delta NIHSS score ≥ 8 between baseline and 24 hours (OR 4.929, 95% CI 2.245–10.818, p < 0.001) were associated with good functional outcome at 90 days. The 24-hour NIHSS score cutoff of 10 outperformed existing indices for prompt neurological improvement in the ability to predict 90-day functional outcome.CONCLUSIONSAn NIHSS score ≤ 10 at 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy was independently associated with good functional outcome at 90 days.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Shinichi Yoshimura ◽  
Nobuyuki Sakai ◽  
Hiroshi Yamagami ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto ◽  
...  

Background: Statin therapy was reported to be associated with lower risk of recurrence of stroke and better functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, the effect of statin therapy in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) was not well scrutinized. Thus, we evaluated the effect of statin administration after the onset of stroke on functional outcome based on the large registry study of acute LVO. Methods: RESCUE-Japan Registry-2 was a physician initiated registry study enrolled consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 hours of onset. We compared those with and without statin after onset in terms of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. We estimated the common odds ratio (OR) for a shift towards better mRS adjusting for confounders. Result: Among 2420patients registered, 2399 patients were eligible. Mean age was 75.9 years and men accounted for 55%. Statin were administered in 447 patients(19%) after admission. There are more atherothrombotic cerebral infarction (statin group: 34.2% vs non-statin group: 12.1%, p <0.0001), younger age (73.4 vs 76.5, p <0.0001), and lower NIHSS on admission (14 vs 17, p <0.0001) in the statin group. The adjusted common OR of the statin group was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 - 1.37; p =0.02) compared with the non-statin group. The safety profile was similar between groups. The mortality at 90 days was 4.7 % in the statin group lower than 12.5 % in the non-statin group (p <0.0001). The adjusted OR of statin group for mortality was 0.36 (95%CI 0.21 to 0.62, p = 0.022). Conclusions: Statin administration after onset of acute LVO was significantly associated with better functional outcome and mortality within 90 days. Our findings should be attested by randomized clinical trials in patients with acute LVO in future


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 3615-3624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang G Kunz ◽  
Wieland H Sommer ◽  
Christopher Höhne ◽  
Matthias P Fabritius ◽  
Felix Schuler ◽  
...  

Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) is the phenomenon of hypoperfusion and hypometabolism of the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere caused by dysfunction of the related supratentorial region. Our aim was to analyze its influence on morphologic and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Subjects with stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation were selected from an initial cohort of 1644 consecutive patients who underwent multiparametric CT including whole-brain CT perfusion. Two experienced readers evaluated the posterior fossa in terms of CCD absence (CCD−) or presence (CCD+). A total of 156 patients formed the study cohort with 102 patients (65.4%) categorized as CCD− and 54 (34.6%) as CCD+. In linear and logistic regression analyses, no significant association between CCD and final infarction volume (β = −0.440, p = 0.972), discharge mRS ≤ 2 (OR = 1.897, p = 0.320), or 90-day mRS ≤ 2 (OR = 0.531, p = 0.492) was detected. CCD+ patients had larger supratentorial cerebral blood flow deficits (median: 164 ml vs. 115 ml; p = 0.001) compared to CCD−patients. Regarding complications, CCD was associated with a higher rate of parenchymal hematomas (OR = 4.793, p = 0.035). In conclusion, CCD is frequently encountered in acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation. CCD was associated with the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma in the ipsilateral cerebral infarction but did not prove to significantly influence patient outcome.


2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110068
Author(s):  
Yu Hang ◽  
Zhen Yu Jia ◽  
Lin Bo Zhao ◽  
Yue Zhou Cao ◽  
Huang Huang ◽  
...  

Background Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) were usually transferred from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular treatment (drip-and-ship [DS]), while driving the doctor from a CSC to a PSC to perform a procedure is an alternative strategy (drip-and-drive [DD]). Purpose To compare the efficacy and prognosis of the two strategies. Material and Methods From February 2017 to June 2019, 62 patients with LVO received endovascular treatment via the DS and DD models and were retrospectively analyzed from the stroke alliance based on our CSC. Primary endpoint was door-to-reperfusion (DTR) time. Secondary endpoints included puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) rates at the end of the procedure, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Results Forty-one patients received the DS strategy and 21 patients received the DD strategy. The DTR time was significantly longer in the DS group compared to the DD group (315.5 ± 83.8 min vs. 248.6 ± 80.0 min; P < 0.05), and PTR time was shorter (77.2 ± 35.9 min vs. 113.7 ± 69.7 min; P = 0.033) compared with the DD group. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) was achieved in 89% (36/41) of patients in the DS group and 86% (18/21) in the DD group ( P = 1.000). Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 49% (20/41) of patients in the DS group and 71% (15/21) in the DD group at 90 days ( P = 0.089). Conclusion Compared with the DS strategy, the DD strategy showed more effective and a trend of better clinical outcomes for AIS patients with LVO.


Author(s):  
Pauli E. T. Vuorinen ◽  
Jyrki P. J. Ollikainen ◽  
Pasi A. Ketola ◽  
Riikka-Liisa K. Vuorinen ◽  
Piritta A. Setälä ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In acute ischemic stroke, conjugated eye deviation (CED) is an evident sign of cortical ischemia and large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to determine if an emergency dispatcher can recognise LVO stroke during an emergency call by asking the caller a binary question regarding whether the patient’s head or gaze is away from the side of the hemiparesis or not. Further, we investigated if the paramedics can confirm this sign at the scene. In the group of positive CED answers to the emergency dispatcher, we investigated what diagnoses these patients received at the emergency department (ED). Among all patients brought to ED and subsequently treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) we tracked the proportion of patients with a positive CED answer during the emergency call. Methods We collected data on all stroke dispatches in the city of Tampere, Finland, from 13 February 2019 to 31 October 2020. We then reviewed all patient records from cases where the dispatcher had marked ‘yes’ to the question regarding patient CED in the computer-aided emergency response system. We also viewed all emergency department admissions to see how many patients in total were treated with MT during the period studied. Results Out of 1913 dispatches, we found 81 cases (4%) in which the caller had verified CED during the emergency call. Twenty-four of these patients were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. Paramedics confirmed CED in only 9 (11%) of these 81 patients. Two patients with positive CED answers during the emergency call and 19 other patients brought to the emergency department were treated with MT. Conclusion A small minority of stroke dispatches include a positive answer to the CED question but paramedics rarely confirm the emergency medical dispatcher’s suspicion of CED as a sign of LVO. Few patients in need of MT can be found this way. Stroke dispatch protocol with a CED question needs intensive implementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document