Clinical outcome after surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysms: a pragmatic meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials with short- and long-term follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Falk Delgado ◽  
Tommy Andersson ◽  
Anna Falk Delgado
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

BackgroundTwo randomized trials have evaluated clipping and coiling in patients with ruptured aneurysms. Aggregated evidence for management of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms is missing.ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcome after aneurysm treatment.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies evaluating aneurysm treatment. The primary outcome measure was an independent clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale 0–2, Glasgow Outcome Scale 4–5, or equivalent). Secondary outcomes were poor outcome and mortality. ORs were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis with 95% CIs. Outcome heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochrane's Q test (significance level cut-off value at <0.10) and I2(significance cut-off value >50%) with the Mantel–Haenszel method for dichotomous outcomes. A p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.ResultsSearches yielded 18 802 articles. All titles were assessed, 403 abstracts were evaluated, and 183 full-text articles were read. One-hundred and fifty articles were qualitatively assessed and 85 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Patients treated with coiling (randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) had higher independent outcome at short-term follow-up (OR=0.67, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.79). Independent outcome was favored for coiling at intermediate and long-term follow-up (RCTs and observational studies combined—OR=0.80, 0.68 to 0.94 and OR=0.81, 0.71 to 0.93, respectively). Independent outcome and lower mortality was favored after coiling in unruptured aneurysms (database registry studies) at short-term follow-up (OR=0.34, 0.29 to 0.41 and OR=1.74, 1.52 to 1.98, respectively).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcome after coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysms, indicates a higher independent outcome and lower mortality after coiling.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Nonsurgical Treatment Options for Enthesopathy of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 3019-3029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayson Lian ◽  
Amin Mohamadi ◽  
Jimmy J. Chan ◽  
Phillip Hanna ◽  
David Hemmati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Extensor Carpi Radialis

Background: Numerous treatment options have been proposed for enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (eECRB). Purpose: To (1) compare the efficacy and safety of nonsurgical treatment options for eECRB described in randomized placebo-controlled trials at short-term, midterm, and long-term follow-up and (2) evaluate outcomes in patients receiving placebo. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, 4 electronic databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials for eECRB. Studies reporting visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores and/or grip strength were included. Random- or fixed-effects meta-analysis was employed to compare treatments with at least 2 eligible studies using the standardized mean difference and odds ratio. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018075009). Results: Thirty-six randomized placebo-controlled trials, evaluating 11 different treatment modalities, with a total of 2746 patients were included. At short-term follow-up, only local corticosteroid injection improved pain; however, it was associated with pain worse than placebo at long-term follow-up. At midterm follow-up, laser therapy and local botulinum toxin injection improved pain. At long-term follow-up, extracorporeal shock wave therapy provided pain relief. With regard to grip strength, only laser therapy showed better outcomes in comparison with placebo. While there was no difference among various treatments in the odds ratio of an adverse event, they all increased adverse events compared with placebo. In placebo-receiving patients, a sharp increase in the percentage of patients reporting mild pain or less was observed from 2% at short-term follow-up to 92% at midterm follow-up. Conclusion: Most patients experienced pain resolution after receiving placebo within 4 weeks of follow-up. At best, all treatments provided only small pain relief while increasing the odds of adverse events. Therefore, if clinicians are inclined to provide a treatment for particular patients, they may consider a pain relief regimen for the first 4 weeks of symptom duration. Patient-specific factors should be considered when deciding on treatment or watchful waiting.

Exercise interventions in lateral elbow tendinopathy have better outcomes than passive interventions, but the effects are small: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2123 subjects in 30 trials

2020 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2020-102525
Author(s):  
Stefanos Karanasios ◽  
Vasileios Korakakis ◽  
Rod Whiteley ◽  
Ioannis Vasilogeorgis ◽  
Sarah Woodbridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Lateral Elbow ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Wait And See ◽  
Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of exercise compared with other conservative interventions in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) on pain and function.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to grade the certainty of evidence. Self-perceived improvement, pain intensity, pain-free grip strength (PFGS) and elbow disability were used as primary outcome measures.Eligibility criteriaRCTs assessing the effectiveness of exercise alone or as an additive intervention compared with passive interventions, wait-and-see or injections in patients with LET.Results30 RCTs (2123 participants, 5 comparator interventions) were identified. Exercise outperformed (low certainty) corticosteroid injections in all outcomes at all time points except short-term pain reduction. Clinically significant differences were found in PFGS at short-term (mean difference (MD): 12.15, (95% CI) 1.69 to 22.6), mid-term (MD: 22.45, 95% CI 3.63 to 41.3) and long-term follow-up (MD: 18, 95% CI 11.17 to 24.84). Statistically significant differences (very low certainty) for exercise compared with wait-and-see were found only in self-perceived improvement at short-term, pain reduction and elbow disability at short-term and long-term follow-up. Substantial heterogeneity in descriptions of equipment, load, duration and frequency of exercise programmes were evident.ConclusionsLow and very low certainty evidence suggests exercise is effective compared with passive interventions with or without invasive treatment in LET, but the effect is small.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018082703.

scholarly journals POS1099 EFFICACY OF INTRA-ARTICULAR CORTICOSTEROID INJECTIONS IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 829.2-830
Author(s):  
A. Najm ◽  
A. Alunno ◽  
C. Weill ◽  
J. Gwinnutt ◽  
F. Berenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
And Function

Background:Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent degenerative disease representing an important health and economic burden. Symptomatic medical treatments available include intra-articular (IA) injections of corticosteroids (GC) but their efficacy is debated. In addition, safety signals regarding cartilage damage with IA GC have been highlighted in a few studies.Objectives:To perform a meta-analysis of studies assessing IA GC efficacy and safety in knee OA.Methods:A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of GC IA injections versus other interventions (IA Hyaluronic Acid, IA placebo, IA NSAID, oral NSAID or physiotherapy) in knee OA was performed. The effect of the interventions on pain and function were extracted from the single studies and pooled and are presented as short term (<6weeks), medium term (6-24 weeks) and long term (>24 weeks) follow-up period. Standardized mean differences (SMD) are reported.Results:Of 520 studies screened, 23 were included in the SLR and 14 subsequently included in the MA. While IA GC showed a superior effect compared to control on both pain (SMD -0.61 (95% CI -1,25, 0.03)) and function (SMD -1.02 (95% CI -2.14, 0.10)) in short term follow-up; long term follow-up analysis favored controls (IA HA, IA NSAID, physiotherapy) for both pain (SMD 0.68 (95% CI -0.11, 1.47)) and function (SMD 0.88 (95% CI -0.36, 2.12) outcomes (Figure 1). No difference was found between interventions in the medium term. Safety data were reported in 18/23 studies (n= 1936/2314 patients); and side effects were reported as follows: arthralgia (69 IA GC patients, 146 IA HA patients, and 20 saline patients); site injection pain (7 in the IA GC group, 2 in the IA saline group, 14 in the IA HA group); 16 post injection knee swelling without signs of septic arthritis in the IA GC group and 24 in the IA HA group. In one study assessing cartilage effects of GCs, the rate of cartilage loss was greater in the GC group with a reduction of cartilage thickness at 2 year compared to placebo group. No difference was observed in the progression of cartilage denudation or bone marrow lesion. On the contrary, another study showed no effect of injections on the cartilage structure.Conclusion:We demonstrate in this work that IA GC injections reduce pain and improve function in the early phase (≤6 weeks) of treatment. In the long term (≥24 weeks), other intervention such as IA HA injections or physiotherapy seem to be more efficient, but this effect was largely driven by single studies with large effect sizes and the comparators were heterogeneous.Figure 1.Knee pain outcome at short term (≤6weeks) (A), medium term (>6 & <24 weeks) (B), and long term (≥24 weeks) (C) follow up.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Surgery in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duanlu Hou ◽  
Ying Lu ◽  
Danhong Wu ◽  
Yuping Tang ◽  
Qiang Dong
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Background: Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has been evaluated in clinical trials. Although meta-analyses on this topic have been performed in the past, recent trials have added important information to the results of the comparison. However, little work has been done to compare the effect of MIS and conventional treatment on patient prognosis, especially mortality.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on May 1, 2021, for randomized controlled trials of MIS for spontaneous ICH. The primary outcome was defined as death at follow-up, while the secondary outcome was defined as death in different comparisons between MIS and craniotomy (CT) or medication (Me).Results: The initial search yielded 12 high-quality randomized controlled trials involving 2,100 patients. We analyzed the odds ratios (ORs) for MIS compared with conventional treatment, including Me and conventional CT. The OR and confidence intervals (CIs) of the primary and secondary outcomes were 0.62 (0.45–0.85) for MIS vs. conventional treatment. We also conducted subgroup analyses and found that the ORs and CIs for MIS compared with that of conventional treatment in the short-term follow-up were 0.58 (0.42–0.80), and, in the long-term follow-up, was 0.67 (0.46–0.98); and found that ORs were 0.68 (0.48–0.98) for MIS vs. CT and 0.57 (0.41–0.79) for MIS vs. Me.Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that certain patients with ICH benefit in short- and long-term follow-up from MIS over other treatments, including open surgery and conventional Me.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

Nonsurgical Treatments of Patellar Tendinopathy: Multiple Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma Are a Suitable Option: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1001-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Andriolo ◽  
Sante Alessandro Altamura ◽  
Davide Reale ◽  
Christian Candrian ◽  
Stefano Zaffagnini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Eccentric Exercise ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patellar Tendinopathy ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Background: Patellar tendinopathy is a condition characterized by anterior knee activity–related pain. It has a high incidence among athletes engaged in jumping sports and may become a chronic condition. Nonoperative management is the first choice in these patients, and several nonsurgical treatment options have been proposed. Nonetheless, clear indications on the most effective approach to address patellar tendinopathy are still lacking. Purpose: To analyze the evidence on nonoperative options to treat chronic patellar tendinopathy through a systematic review of the literature and to perform a meta-analysis to identify the most effective nonsurgical option. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: The search was conducted with the PubMed and Cochrane databases on January 4, 2017. All clinical English-language reports of any level of evidence on nonsurgical treatment of patellar tendinopathy were included. The quality of each article was assessed by use of the Coleman score. A meta-analysis was performed on all articles reporting the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment scale for patellar tendinopathy to evaluate the results of the most described treatments. Results: A total of 70 studies involving 2530 patients were included in the qualitative data synthesis. The Coleman score showed an overall poor study quality. The most described treatment groups that could be included in the meta-analysis were reported in 22 studies on eccentric exercise, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Single and multiple PRP injections were evaluated separately. Eccentric exercise therapies obtained the best results ( P < .05) at short-term (<6 months, mean 2.7 ± 0.7 months). However, multiple injections of PRP obtained the best results ( P < .05), followed by ESWT and eccentric exercise, at long-term follow-up (≥6 months, mean 15.1 ± 11.3 months). Conclusion: The literature documents several nonsurgical approaches for the treatment of chronic patellar tendinopathy with important limitations in terms of study quality. The available evidence showed an overall positive outcome, but some differences have been highlighted. Eccentric exercises may seem the strategy of choice in the short-term, but multiple PRP injections may offer more satisfactory results at long-term follow-up and can be therefore considered a suitable option for the treatment of patellar tendinopathy.

Abstract 1998: Short- and Long-Term Effects of Abciximab in Patients Undergoing Primary Stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujethra Vasu ◽  
Gregg W Stone ◽  
David L Brown
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
No Reduction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Primary Stenting ◽  
Short And Long Term

Background: Both short- and long-term benefits of abciximab therapy in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been reported. However, primary stenting is the preferred treatment of AMI and conflicting data exists on the effect of abciximab therapy on outcomes following primary stent treatment of AMI. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of all randomized trials of abciximab in primary stenting for AMI for which there was short-term (30-day) and long-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases using the following key words: stent, acute myocardial infarction, abciximab and randomized trial. Four studies (ISAR-2, ADMIRAL, CADILLAC and ACE) were included in this analysis. The incidence of the individual end points of death, reinfarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days and at long-term follow-up was extracted. Follow-up data was available at 1 year for ACE and CADILLAC, at 3 years for ADMIRAL and 5 years for ISAR-2. A random effects model was used to calculate the combined odds ratio (OR) of reinfarction, TVR and mortality associated with the use of abciximab. Results: The 4 trials enrolled 2137 patients of whom 1074 were randomized to abciximab and 1063 to placebo. Long-term follow up was available for 2107 patients, 1064 in the abciximab group and 1043 in the control group. At 30 days, abciximab resulted in a significant reduction in the odds of TVR (OR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.27–0.75, P=0.003) and a non-significant reduction in the odds of reinfarction (OR 0.43, 95% CI, 0.18–1.0, P=0.06) but no reduction in 30-day mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.47–1.2, P=0.34). During long-term follow up, abciximab treatment resulted in a non-significant reduction in the risk of TVR (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58–1.0, P=0.06) but no reduction in reinfarction (OR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.3–1.1, P=0.12) or mortality (OR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.48–1.6, P=0.74). Conclusions: Abciximab resulted in a significant reduction in TVR at 30 days that diminished over time. We were unable to demonstrate a significant reduction in reinfarction or mortality at 30 days or at 1–5 years. These results suggest the need for an appropriately powered clinical trial to define the role of abciximab during primary stenting for AMI.

Endovenous laser treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 50-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Darwood ◽  
M J Gough
Keyword(s):  
Laser Energy ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Arbitrary Point ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Endovenous Laser Treatment

Objective Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent truncal veins has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional surgery for varicose veins. Various strategies have been proposed for successful treatment and this study reviews the evidence for these. Method A Medline and ‘controlled trials online database’ search was performed to identify original articles and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes for EVLA. Information on patient selection, equipment, technique and outcomes were recorded. Results Ninety-eight original studies, including five RCTs, were identified. RCT data indicate short-term outcomes (abolition of reflux, improvement in quality of life [QOL], patient satisfaction) were equivalent to those for surgery. Long-term follow-up is not available. A further RCT showed superior outcomes for ablation commencing at the lowest point of superficial venous reflux rather than at an arbitrary point (fewer residual varicosities, greater improvement in QOL). Non-randomized series suggest that laser energy of >60 J/cm results in reliable truncal vein occlusion and that longer wavelength lasers may be associated with less post-treatment discomfort. Conclusion In the short-term EVLA is a safe and effective treatment for patients with varicose veins. Long-term follow-up is still required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document