Too good to intervene? Thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion strokes with minimal symptoms: an intention-to-treat analysis

IntroductionThe minimal stroke severity justifying endovascular intervention remains elusive; however, a significant proportion of patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and mild symptoms subsequently decline and face poor outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate our experience with these patients by comparing best medical therapy with thrombectomy in an intention-to-treat analysis.MethodsAnalysis of prospectively collected data of all consecutive patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5, LVO on CT angiography, and baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–2 from November 2014 to May 2016. After careful discussion with patients/family, a decision to pursue medical or interventional therapy was made. Deterioration (development of aphasia, neglect, and/or significant weakness) triggered reconsideration of thrombectomy. The primary outcome measure was NIHSS shift (discharge NIHSS score minus admission NIHSS score).ResultsOf the 32 patients qualifying for the study, 22 (69%) were primarily treated with medical therapy and 10 (31%) intervention. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Nine (41%) medically treated patients had subsequent deterioration requiring thrombectomy. Median time from arrival to deterioration was 5.2 hours (2.0–25.0). Successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction 2b−3) was achieved in all 19 thrombectomy patients. The NIHSS shift significantly favored thrombectomy (−2.5 vs 0; p<0.01). The median NIHSS score at discharge was low with both thrombectomy (1 (0–3)) and medical therapy (2 (0.5–4.5)). 90-Day mRS 0–2 rates were 100% and 77%, respectively (p=0.15). Multivariable linear regression indicated that thrombectomy was independently associated with a beneficial NIHSS shift (unstandardized β −4.2 (95% CI −8.2 to −0.1); p=0.04).ConclusionsThrombectomy led to a shift towards a lower NIHSS in patients with LVO presenting with minimal stroke symptoms. Despite the overall perception that this condition is benign, nearly a quarter of patients primarily treated with medical therapy did not achieve independence at 90 days.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Imaging Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke and Mild Clinical Symptoms

Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1159/000481205 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (1-2) ◽

pp. 91-98 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Meredith T. Bowen ◽

Leticia C. Rebello ◽

Mehdi Bouslama ◽

Diogo C. Haussen ◽

Jonathan A. Grossberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Logistic Regression ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score ◽

Tandem Occlusion

Background: The minimal stroke severity justifying endovascular intervention remains elusive. However, a significant proportion of patients presenting with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) and mild symptoms go untreated and face poor outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with LVOS and low symptom scores (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤8) undergoing endovascular therapy (ET). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected ET database between September 2010 and March 2016. Endovascularly treated patients with LVOS and a baseline NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcome parameters were collected. Efficacy outcomes were the rate of good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) and of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score 2b-3). Safety was assessed by the rate of parenchymal hematoma (parenchymal hematoma type 1 [PH-1] and parenchymal hematoma type 2 [PH-2]) and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of good clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 935 patients were considered; 72 patients with an NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Median [IQR] age was 61.5 years [56.2-73.0]; 39 patients (54%) were men. Mean (SD) baseline NIHSS score, computed tomography perfusion core volume, and ASPECTS were 6.3 (1.5), 7.5 mL (16.1), and 8.5 (1.3), respectively. Twenty-eight patients (39%) received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Occlusions locations were as follows: 29 (40%) proximal MCA-M1, 20 (28%) MCA-M2, 6 (8%) ICA terminus, and 9 (13%) vertebrobasilar. Tandem occlusion was documented in 7 patients (10%). Sixty-seven patients (93%) achieved successful reperfusion (mTICI score 2b-3); 52 (72%) had good 90-day outcomes. Mean final infarct volume was 32.2 ± 59.9 mL. Parenchymal hematoma occurred in 4 patients (6%). Ninety-day mortality was 10% (n = 7). Logistic regression showed that only successful reperfusion (OR 27.7, 95% CI 1.1-655.5, p = 0.04) was an independent predictor of good outcomes. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that ET is safe and feasible for LVOS patients presenting with mild clinical syndromes. Future controlled studies are warranted.

Download Full-text

Abstract 3183: Prognosis of Mild Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3183 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Esteban Cheng-Ching ◽

Russell Cerejo ◽

Ken Uchino ◽

Muhammad S Hussain ◽

Gabor Toth

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Time Window ◽

Optimal Treatment ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score ◽

Mild Stroke

Background and purpose Large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke has been reported to be an independent predictor of unfavorable clinical outcome. However, the prognosis and optimal treatment of patients with only mild neurologic deficits due to LVO are not known. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review from a database of stroke patients admitted to our large academic medical center between July 1, 2010 and June 30 , 2011. Inclusion criteria were acute stroke or TIA, presentation within 9 hours from symptom onset, large vessel occlusion as a culprit of ischemic symptoms, and mild stroke severity with initial NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <8. Results We identified 59 patients with mild ischemic stroke or TIA, who were evaluated within 9 hours from onset. Of these, 13 (22%) had culprit large vessel occlusions. Five were female, 1 had diabetes, 12 had hypertension, 7 had hyperlipidemia, 2 had atrial fibrillation and 7 were smokers. The median NIHSS score was 5. The location of arterial occlusions were 5 in M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), 6 in M2 segment of MCA, 1 each in posterior cerebral and vertebral arteries. Two patients received acute therapy, 1 with intravenous thrombolysis and 1 with endovascular therapy. Reasons for withholding thrombolytic therapy were time window in 8, mild stroke severity in 2, and atypical presentations in 2. Reasons for withholding acute endovascular therapy were mild stroke severity in 7, imaging finding in 2, technical considerations in 2, and lack of consent in 1. From hospital admission to discharge, 10 (77%) patients had symptom improvement, 2 had worsening, and one was unchanged. At 30 days, 5 (38%) had good outcome with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1. Three (23%) had mRS of 2, one (8%) patient had mRS of 3. Outcomes for 4 patients were unknown. Conclusions A significant proportion of patients presenting with mild ischemic symptoms has large vessel occlusion. Acute treatment in this population is frequently withheld due to mild severity or thrombolytic time window. Despite mild symptoms at presentation, some patients are left with moderate disability. Optimal treatment options for this population should be further evaluated in a larger group of patients.

Download Full-text

Similar admission NIHSS may represent larger tissue-at-risk in patients with right-sided versus left-sided large vessel occlusion

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017785 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. neurintsurg-2021-017785

Author(s):

Adrian Mak ◽

Charles Matouk ◽

Emily W Avery ◽

Jonas Behland ◽

Dietmar Frey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Linear Models ◽

Infarct Volume ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score ◽

Clinical Biomarker

BackgroundWe investigated the effects of the side of large vessel occlusion (LVO) on post-thrombectomy infarct volume and clinical outcome with regard to admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with anterior LVO who received endovascular thrombectomy and follow-up MRI. Applying voxel-wise general linear models and multivariate analysis, we assessed the effects of occlusion side, admission NIHSS, and post-thrombectomy reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, mTICI) on final infarct distribution and volume as well as discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score.ResultsWe included 469 patients, 254 with left-sided and 215 with right-sided LVO. Admission NIHSS was higher in those with left-sided LVO (median (IQR) 16 (10–22)) than in those with right-sided LVO (14 (8–16), p>0.001). In voxel-wise analysis, worse post-thrombectomy reperfusion, lower admission NIHSS score, and poor discharge outcome were associated with right-hemispheric infarct lesions. In multivariate analysis, right-sided LVO was an independent predictor of larger final infarct volume (p=0.003). There was a significant three-way interaction between admission stroke severity (based on NIHSS), LVO side, and mTICI with regard to final infarct volume (p=0.041). Specifically, in patients with moderate stroke (NIHSS 6–15), incomplete reperfusion (mTICI 0–2b) was associated with larger final infarct volume (p<0.001) and worse discharge outcome (p=0.02) in right-sided compared with left-sided LVO.ConclusionsWhen adjusted for admission NIHSS, worse post-thrombectomy reperfusion is associated with larger infarct volume and worse discharge outcome in right-sided versus left-sided LVO. This may represent larger tissue-at-risk in patients with right-sided LVO when applying admission NIHSS as a clinical biomarker for penumbra.

Download Full-text

Progression of cerebral infarction before and after thrombectomy is modified by prehospital pathways

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017155 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. neurintsurg-2020-017155

Author(s):

Alexander M Kollikowski ◽

Franziska Cattus ◽

Julia Haag ◽

Jörn Feick ◽

Alexander G März ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patient Characteristics ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Time Intervals ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Before And After ◽

Transferred Patients ◽

Stroke Center

BackgroundEvidence of the consequences of different prehospital pathways before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion stroke is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the infarct extent and progression before and after MT in directly admitted (mothership) versus transferred (drip and ship) patients using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS).MethodsASPECTS of 535 consecutive large vessel occlusion stroke patients eligible for MT between 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed for differences in the extent of baseline, post-referral, and post-recanalization infarction between the mothership and drip and ship pathways. Time intervals and transport distances of both pathways were analyzed. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the association between infarct progression (baseline to post-recanalization ASPECTS decline), patient characteristics, and logistic key figures.ResultsASPECTS declined during transfer (9 (8–10) vs 7 (6-9), p<0.0001), resulting in lower ASPECTS at stroke center presentation (mothership 9 (7–10) vs drip and ship 7 (6–9), p<0.0001) and on follow-up imaging (mothership 7 (4–8) vs drip and ship 6 (3–7), p=0.001) compared with mothership patients. Infarct progression was significantly higher in transferred patients (points lost, mothership 2 (0–3) vs drip and ship 3 (2–6), p<0.0001). After multivariable adjustment, only interfacility transfer, preinterventional clinical stroke severity, the degree of angiographic recanalization, and the duration of the thrombectomy procedure remained predictors of infarct progression (R2=0.209, p<0.0001).ConclusionsInfarct progression and postinterventional infarct extent, as assessed by ASPECTS, varied between the drip and ship and mothership pathway, leading to more pronounced infarction in transferred patients. ASPECTS may serve as a radiological measure to monitor the benefit or harm of different prehospital pathways for MT.

Download Full-text

Abstract 1122‐000125: Underlying ICAD is Associated with Worse Outcome in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Undergoing Endovascular Therapy

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000125 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Sonam Thind ◽

Ali Mansour ◽

Scott Mendelson ◽

Elisheva Coleman ◽

James Brorson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Functional Outcome ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Fold Increase ◽

Large Vessel ◽

High Risk Population ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score ◽

Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease ◽

Poor Outcomes

Introduction : Acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) can be secondary to thromboembolism or underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Data on the management of LVO due to underlying ICAD are scarce. We hypothesized that patients with ICAD would have worse clinical outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) than those without ICAD. Methods : We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent MT for LVO in a large academic comprehensive stroke center between 01/2018 and 05/2021. Presence of underlying ICAD at the site of LVO was determined by the treating interventionalist. We compared outcomes including in‐hospital mortality and 90‐day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between those with and without underlying ICAD, adjusting for relevant covariates using logistic regression. Results : Among 195 patients (mean age 67.4+15.1 years, 56.9% female, 81% black, median NIHSS score 15), underlying ICAD was present in 39 (20.0%). Stent‐retrievers were used 196 patients with only 3 having rescue stent placement. There were no significant differences in baseline factors amongst the two groups except diabetes was more common (69.2% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.028) and intravenous thrombolysis provided less often (17.9% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.027) in those with ICAD. TICI 2B or higher was achieved in 82.1% of ICAD compared with 94.3% of non‐ICAD patients (p = 0.012). Mortality was more common (50.0% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.025) and good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days was less common (10.8% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.002) in the ICAD group. Adjusting for age, diabetes, intravenous thrombolysis, baseline NIHSS score, and final TICI score, underlying ICAD was an independent predictor of mRS 0–2 at 90 days (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.4‐14.2, p = 0.010). Conclusions : Underlying ICAD is associated with 4.5‐fold increase in poor functional outcome in patients with LVO undergoing traditional MT. Further research is needed to understand factors associated with poor outcomes investigate alternative interventional approaches and medical management in this high‐risk population.

Download Full-text

Abstract P514: Clinically Approximated Hypoperfused Tissue in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p514 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Shashvat Desai ◽

Santiago Ortega ◽

Sunil Sheth ◽

Mudassir Farooqui ◽

Victor Lopez Rivera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Conversion Factor ◽

Time Window ◽

Clinical Severity ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Late Time ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score ◽

Derivation Cohort

Introduction: Patient selection for thrombectomy of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the delayed time window (>6 hours) is dependent on delineation of clinical-core mismatch or radiological target mismatch using perfusion imaging. Selection paradigms not involving advanced imaging and software processing may reduce time to treatment and broaden eligibility. We aim to develop a conversion factor to approximately determine the volume of hypoperfused tissue using the NIHSS score [CAT volume (clinically approximated tissue)] and explore its ability to identify patients eligible for thrombectomy in the late time window. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of anterior circulation LVO strokes at three comprehensive stroke centers. Demographic, clinical (NIHSS score, TLKW-time last known well) and imaging [computed tomography with perfusion (CTP) processed using RAPID, IschemaView] information was analyzed. A conversion factor, which is a multiple of the NIHSS score (one multiple for NIHSS score <10 and another for NIHSS score ≥10), was derived to calculate CAT volumes. Accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of CAT-based thrombectomy eligibility criteria (similar to DEFUSE-3 criteria but using CAT volume instead of Tmax >6 seconds volume) was tested using DEFUSE-3 criteria eligibility as a gold standard. Result: Of the 309 LVO strokes [mean age of 70 ±14, 46% male, median NIHSS 16 (12-20)] included in this study, 38% of patients arrived beyond 6 hours of TLKW. Conversion factors derived (derivation cohort-center A:187) based on median (50 th percentile) values of Tmax >6s volume for NIHSS <10 subgroup was 15 and for NIHSS ≥10 subgroup was 6. Subsequently calculated CAT volume-based eligibility criteria yielded a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 92% in detecting DEFUSE-3 eligible patients (AUC-0.92 CI-0.82-1) in the validation cohort (center B and C:122). Conclusions: Clinical severity of stroke (NIHSS score) may be used to calculate the volume of hypoperfused tissue during LVO stroke. Clinically approximated hypoperfused tissue (CAT) volumes for NIHSS score <10 (using a factor of 15) and ≥10 (using a factor of 6) subgroups can accurately identify DEFUSE-3 eligible patients.

Download Full-text

Abstract 3314: The Role of Bridging with Intravenous Thrombolysis in Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3314 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Omar Kass-Hout ◽

Tareq Kass-Hout ◽

Maxim Mokin ◽

David Orion ◽

Shadi Jahshan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Combined Therapy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

P Value ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score

Background: Large vessel occlusions with a high clot burden are less likely to improve with the FDA-approved IV strategy. Endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke symptom onset provides an effective alternative treatment in patients with large vessel occlusion. It is not clear if combination of IV thrombolysis and endovascular approach is superior to endovascular treatment alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated within the first 3 h stroke onset during the 2005-2010 period. First group received endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke onset. Second group consisted of patients who received IV thrombolysis within the first 3 h followed by endovascular therapy. We compared the following outcomes: revascularization rates, NIHSS score at discharge, mRS at discharge and 3months, symptomatic hemorrhage rates and mortality. Results: Among 104 patients identified, 42 received combined therapy, and 62 received endovascular therapy only. The two groups had similar demographic (age and sex distribution) and vascular risk factors distribution, as well as NIHSS score on admission (14.8±4.7 and 16.0±5.3; p=0.23). We found no difference in TIMI recanalization rates (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scale score of 2 or 3) following combined or endovascular therapy alone (83.3% and 79.0%; p=0.59). A preferred outcome, defined as a mRS of 2 or less at 90 days also did not differ between the combined therapy group and the endovascular only group (37.5% and 34.5%; p=0.76). There was no difference in mortality rate (22.5% and 31.0%; p=0.36) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (9.5% and 8.1%; p=0.73). There was a significant difference in mean time from symptom onset to endovascular treatment between the combined group (227±88 min) and endovascular only group (125±40 min; p<0.0001).Patients with good TIMI recanalization rate of 2 or 3 showed a trend of having a better mRS at 90 days in both bridging (16.67% vs. 41.18%, p-value: 0.3813) and endovascular groups (25% vs. 34.78%, p-value: 0.7326).When analyzing the correlation of mRS at 90 days with the site of occlusion, patients in the bridging group showed a trend of a better outcome when the site of occlusion was ICA (33.3% vs 30%) and MCA (66.67% vs. 27.59%) and worse outcome when the site of occlusion was in the posterior circulation (26.32% vs. 50%), however, these results were not statistically significant (p-values: 0.1735& 0.5366). Conclusion: Combining IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy achieves similar rates of clinical outcomes, revascularization rates, complications and mortality rates, when compared with endovascular treatment alone. The combined therapy, however, significantly delays initiation of endovascular treatment. A randomized prospective trial comparing both treatment strategies in acute ischemic stroke is warranted

Download Full-text

Abstract TP237: Can We Improve Clinical Detection of Right Hemisphere Large Vessel Occlusion?

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.tp237 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Sana Somani ◽

Melissa Gazi ◽

Michael Minor ◽

Joe Acker ◽

Abimbola Fadairo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Left Hemisphere ◽

Right Hemisphere ◽

Trauma System ◽

Area Under The Curve ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Emergency Medical ◽

The Right

Introduction: The Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment (EMSA) is a six point stroke severity scale with one point each for gaze preference, facial droop, arm drift, leg drift, abnormal naming, and abnormal repetition that was developed to help emergency medical services (EMS) providers identify acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). We hypothesized that the EMSA would detect left hemisphere LVO with a higher sensitivity than right hemisphere LVO. Methods: We trained 24 trauma system-based emergency communication center (ECC) paramedics in the EMSA. ECC-guided EMS in performance of the EMSA on patients with suspected stroke. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI) of ECC-guided prehospital EMSA for right versus left hemisphere ICA or M1 occlusion. Results: We enrolled 569 patients from September 2016 through February 2018, out of which 236 had a discharge diagnosis of stroke and 173 had a diagnosis of AIS. We excluded patients with bilateral (n=21) and brainstem (n=21) AIS. There were 64 patients with left hemisphere AIS including 19 with LVO. There were 67 patients with right hemisphere AIS including 22 with LVO. A score of ≥ 4 points yielded a sensitivity of 84.2 (95% CI = 60.4-96.6) and specificity of 66.7 (51.1-80.0) for left hemisphere LVO compared to a sensitivity of 68.2 (45.1-86.1) and specificity of 73.9 (58.9-85.7) for right hemisphere LVO. For predicting a left hemisphere LVO, the AUC was 0.77 (0.65-0.90) compared to 0.66 (0.50-0.82) for right-sided LVO. Assigning 2 points for abnormal gaze yielded an AUC of 0.78 (0.66-0.91) versus 0.67 (0.52-0.83) for left and right hemisphere LVO, respectively. Conclusions: The EMSA, like the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) upon which it is based, is more sensitive to left compared to right hemisphere LVO. More heavily weighting abnormal gaze did not improve the sensitivity of the EMSA for right hemisphere LVO. There is no comparable data on the right versus left hemisphere performance of other prehospital scales. There is a need to develop sensitive tests of right hemisphere dysfunction that are suitable for use in the field.

Download Full-text

Presence of the hyperintense acute reperfusion marker on MRI after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion is associated with worse early neurological recovery

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012498 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. 641-643 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Rishi Gupta ◽

Chung-Huan Johnny Sun ◽

Dustin Rochestie ◽

Kumiko Owada ◽

Ahmad Khaldi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Logistic Regression ◽

Reperfusion Injury ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Binary Logistic Regression ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Neurological Recovery ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score

BackgroundMechanical thrombectomy has become the accepted treatment for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. Unfortunately, a large cohort of patients do not achieve functional independence with treatment, even though the results are more robust than with medical management. The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) on MRI is an indication of the breakdown of the blood–brain barrier and reperfusion injury.ObjectiveTo examine the hypothesis that the presence of HARM on MRI correlates with worse neurological recovery after reperfusion therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 35 consecutive patients who between February 24, 2016 and April 23, 2016 underwent MRI to determine the presence of HARM after thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Demographic, radiographic imaging, and outcome data were collected. Univariate and binary logistic regression models were performed to assess predictors for improvement of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score by ≥8 points at 24 hours.ResultsThe 35 patients studied had an average age of 64±14 years of age with a median NIHSS score of 15 (IQR 9–20). Eighteen patients (51%) were found to have a HARM-positive MRI. In univariate analysis, patients with HARM were older, had lower reperfusion rates and more postprocedural hemorrhages. In binary logistic regression modeling, the absence of HARM was independently associated with a ≥8-point NIHSS score improvement at 24 hours (OR=7.14, 95% CI 1.22 to 41.67).ConclusionsThis preliminary analysis shows that the presence of HARM may be linked to worse neurological recovery 24 hours after thrombectomy. Reperfusion injury may affect the number of patients achieving functional independence after treatment.

Download Full-text

Initial hospital management of patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the standards and guidelines committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011984 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 316-323 ◽

Cited By ~ 64

Author(s):

Ryan A McTaggart ◽

Sameer A Ansari ◽

Mayank Goyal ◽

Todd A Abruzzo ◽

Barb Albani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ct Perfusion ◽

Imaging Techniques ◽

Hospital Management ◽

Clinical Severity ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Initial Hospital ◽

Iv Tpa

ObjectiveTo summarize the current literature regarding the initial hospital management of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO), and to offer recommendations designed to decrease the time to endovascular treatment (EVT) for appropriately selected patients with stroke.MethodsUsing guidelines for evidenced-based medicine proposed by the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association, a critical review of all available medical literature supporting best initial medical management of patients with AIS secondary to ELVO was performed. The purpose was to identify processes of care that most expeditiously determine the eligibility of a patient with an acute stroke for interventions including intravenous fibrinolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) and EVT using mechanical embolectomy.ResultsThis review identifies four elements that are required to achieve timely revascularization in ELVO. (1) In addition to non-contrast CT (NCCT) brain scan, CT angiography should be performed in all patients who meet an institutional threshold for clinical stroke severity. The use of any advanced imaging beyond NCCT should not delay the administration of IV tPA in eligible patients. (2) Activation of the neurointerventional team should occur as soon as possible, based on either confirmation of large vessel occlusion or a prespecified clinical severity threshold. (3) Additional imaging techniques, particularly those intended to physiologically select patients for EVT (CT perfusion and diffusion–perfusion mismatch imaging), may provide additional value, but should not delay EVT. (4) Routine use of general anesthesia during EVT procedures, should be avoided if possible. These workflow recommendations apply to both primary and comprehensive stroke centers and should be tailored to meet the needs of individual institutions.ConclusionsPatients with ELVO are at risk for severe neurologic morbidity and mortality. To achieve the best possible clinical outcomes stroke centers must optimize their triage strategies. Strategies that provide patients with ELVO with the fastest access to reperfusion depend upon detail-oriented process improvement.

Download Full-text