Lack of effect of nitrogen dioxide exposure on heart rate variability in patients with stable coronary heart disease and impaired left ventricular systolic function

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 587-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Scaife ◽  
Justin Barclay ◽  
Graham S Hillis ◽  
Janaki Srinivasan ◽  
David W Macdonald ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Cocco ◽  
Paul Jerie

Multicenter trials have demonstrated that in patients with sinus rhythm ivabradine is effective in the therapy of ischemic heart disease and of impaired left ventricular systolic function. Ivabradine is ineffective in atrial fibrillation. Many patients with symptomatic heart failure have diastolic dysfunction with preserved left ventricular systolic function, and many have asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ivabradine is not indicated in these conditions, but it happens that it is <em>erroneously</em> used. Digoxin is now considered an outdated and potentially dangerous drug and while effective in the mentioned conditions, is rarely used. The aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic effects of ivabradine in diastolic heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. Patients were assigned to ivabradine or digoxin according to a randomization cross-over design. Data were single-blind analyzed. The analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat method. Forty-two coronary patients were selected. In spite of maximally tolerated therapy with renin-antagonists, diuretics and ?-blockers, they had congestive diastolic heart failure with preserved systolic function. Both ivabradine and digoxin had positive effects on dyspnea, Nterminal natriuretic peptide, heart rate, duration of 6-min. walk-test and signs of diastolic dysfunction, but digoxin was high-statistically more effective. Side-effects were irrelevant. Data were obtained in a single-center and from 42 patients with ischemic etiology of heart failure. The number of patients is small and does not allow assessing mortality. In coronary patients with symptomatic diastolic heart failure with preserved systolic function low-dose digoxin was significantly more effective than ivabradine and is much cheaper. One should be more critical about ivabradine and low-dose digoxin in diastolic heart failure. To avoid possible negative effects on the cardiac function and a severe reduction of the cardiac output the resting heart rate should not be decreased to &lt;65 beats/min.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Wu ◽  
Lin Liu ◽  
Xin Jiang ◽  
Yao-Yao Hu ◽  
Qiu-Shi Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: At present, China has more than 11 million patients with stable coronary heart disease, becoming a major public health problem. The pathological changes of coronary heart disease can lead to dysfunction of cardiac autonomic nervous system, which increases the risk of complications such as malignant arrhythmia (ventricular flutter, ventricular fibrillation, etc.), heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and rate-pressure-product (RPP), which is highly correlated with myocardial oxygen consumption and indirectly reflects myocardial blood supply and oxygen consumption. Although the guidelines recommend that such patients take drugs to reduce heart rate and myocardial oxygen consumption, the clinical control of heart rate is still not ideal. Thus, in this trial, we will use voluntary breathing exercises as the strategy of exercise rehabilitation patients with SCAD, in order to increase the vagus nerve activity and/or reduce the sympathetic nervous activity, help maintain or rebuild the balance of plant nerve system, improve the time domain index of heart rate variability, reduce the burden on the heart, relieve patients' anxiety and other negative emotions. Methods: This is a 6 months single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial that will be conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Eighty patients who fill out the Informed Consent Form are registered and randomized 1:1 into the VBE-based clinical trial monitoring group (n = 40) or the Routine follow-up group (n = 40). The VBE-based clinical trial monitoring group is given VBE training on the basis of conventional treatment and health education, while the control group received conventional health education and follow-up. The primary outcome will be measured heart rate variability (HRV) and rate-pressure product (RPP). Secondary outcomes will include changes in self-rating anxiety ccale (SAS), total cholesterol(TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL-C),low density lipoprotein(LDL-C), weight and body mass index (BMI). Discussion: This trial will carry out scientific respiratory exercise for patients with stable coronary heart disease, which belongs to the category of active secondary prevention for patients, and changes from remedial to pre-protective. VBE is easy to operate, and is not limited by time and place. It is very important and meaningful to carry out VBE for patients with SCAD. This study will provide considerable evidence for further large-scale trials and alternative strategies for the rehabilitation nursing of patients with SCAD. Trial registration: This study is registered at Chinese Clinical Trials Registry.gov, ID:1900024043.Registered on 23 June 2019.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document