scholarly journals 179 Effect of interscalene block versus anterior suprascapular nerve block on intraoperative and pacu analgesia requirements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Davis ◽  
D Reardon ◽  
G Velli ◽  
M Bright ◽  
L White
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Interscalene Block ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve Block

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Suprascapular Nerve Block in the Treatment of Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yajing Hou ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Xiaojing Sun ◽  
Yake Lou ◽  
Ying Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve Block ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP).Background: SSNB is widely used in various shoulder pains, but whether it is effective in HSP remains unknown.Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched to identify potential citations. Randomized controlled trials meeting the eligible criteria were included in our analysis. The primary endpoint was Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with a maximum value of 100 and a minimum value of 0. Secondary endpoints were passive range of motion (PROM) that pain starts, and the PROM mainly included abduction, flexion, and external rotation. In addition, the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) was also included in our secondary endpoints.Results: Eight studies with 281 patients were included in our analysis. For VAS, there was no obvious difference between SSNB group and control group regardless of the follow-up period (<4 weeks or ≥4 weeks), which were −6.62 (−15.76, 2.53; p = 0.16) and 1.78 (−16.18, 19.74; p = 0.85). For shoulder function, the PROM of abduction, flexion, and external rotation was similar between groups. However, motor function indicator FMA is lower in SSNB control than that in control group, with a mean difference (and 95% CI) of −2.59 (−4.52, −0.66; p = 0.008).Conclusion: SSNB is an effective way for HSP patients.Systematic Review Registration: Registration ID: CRD42021252429.

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness of Suprascapular Nerve Block in the Relief of Acute Post-Operative Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 7;19 (7;9) ◽  
pp. 445-456
Author(s):  
Chih-Peng Lin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Shoulder Surgery ◽  
Surgery Patient ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve Block

Background: The suprascapular nerve accounts for 70% of shoulder sensory innervations, and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been shown to be effective in the relief of chronic shoulder pain including rotator cuff tendinitis, subdeltoid impingement syndrome, and adhesive capsulitis. However, this remains inconclusive for patients undergoing surgery. The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the effectiveness of SSNB for relieving acute postoperative shoulder pain. Objective: To explore the effectiveness of SSNB for relieving acute post-operative shoulder pain. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: Services of general surgery, orthopaedics, and anaesthesiology. Methods: A systematic search of studies on SSNB for post-operative shoulder pain was conducted mainly in PubMed and Scopus. The standardized mean difference (SMD) of postoperative pain scales of SSNB versus placebo was treated as the primary outcome, whereas the odds ratio of nausea of SSNB versus placebo comprised the secondary outcome. Results: The meta-analysis included 7 randomized controlled trials and 2 comparative studies comprising 681 participants in total. The quantitative analysis showed a significantly lower pain level of SSNB versus placebo in the shoulder surgery patient group (SMD: -0.33; 95% confidence level [CI]: -0.51 to -0.15), but not in the non-shoulder surgery group (SMD: 0.28; 95% CI: -0.37 to 1.93). The pooled odds ratio of nausea in the SSNB arm compared with the placebo arm was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.45), indicating a reduction in the incidence of nausea following SSNB. Limitations: Heterogeneity of included trials. Conclusions: SSNB significantly reduced acute post-operative shoulder pain in the shoulder surgery group but not in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery or thoracotomy. This suggests that SSNB can be used as a method of polymodal analgesia for patients undergoing shoulder surgery; however, it is not recommended for the non-shoulder surgery patient population. Key words: Suprascapular nerve, shoulder surgery, thoracotomy, laparoscopic surgery

scholarly journals Suprascapular Nerve Blockade for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711881585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Kay ◽  
Muzammil Memon ◽  
Thomas Hu ◽  
Nicole Simunovic ◽  
Andrew Duong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Nerve Blocks

Background: Regional nerve blocks are commonly used to manage postoperative pain after arthroscopic shoulder procedures. The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is commonly used; however, because of the reported side effects of ISB, the use of a suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been described as an alternative strategy with fewer reported side effects. Purpose: To examine the efficacy of SSNB for pain control after shoulder arthroscopy compared with ISB as well as anesthesia without a nerve block. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE) were searched on April 20, 2018, to systematically identify and screen the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis of standard mean differences (SMDs) was performed to pool the estimated effects of the nerve blocks. Results: The search identified 14 RCTs that included 1382 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (SD, 13 years). The mean follow-up time was 3 days (range, 24 hours to 6 weeks). Postoperative pain control was significantly more effective in the SSNB groups compared with the control groups within 1 hour (SMD, –0.76; 95% CI, –1.45 to –0.07; P = .03) and 4 to 6 hours (SMD, –0.81; 95% CI, –1.53 to –0.09; P = .03) postoperatively. However, pain control was significantly less effective in the SSNB groups compared with ISB within 1 hour (SMD, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.46; P = .004). No major complications were noted in the SSNB groups, and minor complications such as hoarseness and prolonged motor block were significantly less common for SSNB compared with ISB. Conclusion: Although not more efficacious than ISB in terms of pain control for patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy, SSNB provides significantly improved pain control in comparison with analgesia without a nerve block. Moreover, few major and minor complications are associated with SSNB reported across the literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document