Skin care education and individual counselling versus treatment as usual in healthcare workers with hand eczema

BMJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. f800
Author(s):  
Kim Thomas
BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (dec12 1) ◽  
pp. e7822-e7822 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Ibler ◽  
G. B. E. Jemec ◽  
T. L. Diepgen ◽  
C. Gluud ◽  
J. Lindschou Hansen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maja H Fisker ◽  
Niels E Ebbehøj ◽  
Søren Grove Vejlstrup ◽  
Jane Lindschou ◽  
Christian Gluud ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A44.2-A45
Author(s):  
Henk van der Molen ◽  
Sanja Kezic ◽  
Maryam Soltanipoor ◽  
Thomas Rustemeyer

Healthcare workers (HCW) are at risk for developing hand dermatitis (HD) caused by exposure to wet work. Guidelines for the prevention of HD recommend regular use of moisturizers, however in practice their use remains low and their effectiveness is poorly investigated.The main objective of this randomized control trial was to assess whether an intervention aimed at improving skin care leads to reduction in HD severity. The intervention included provision of cream dispensers with electronic monitoring of use, regularly communicated to the HCW. The primary and secondary outcomes were change from baseline in Hand Eczema Severity Index score (ΔHECSI) and Natural Moisturizing Factor (ΔNMF) levels as a biomarker of early changes in the skin barrier. Nine wards (285 HCW) were allocated to an intervention group (IG) and 10 wards (216 HCW) to the control group (CG).At baseline, IG and CG had similar exposure to wet work, use of skin care and severity of HD. At follow-up (1 year) the IG showed significantly higher frequency of hand cream use as compared to the CG (self-reported data). Though, electronically collected data in the IG showed that the average frequency of 0.4 cream applications/shift was far below recommended 2 applications/shift. The HECSI reduced significantly in the IG for −6.2 (95%CI −7.7,−4.7) and in the CG −4.2 points (95% CI −6.0,–2.4). There was no difference in ΔHECSI or ΔNMF between IG and CG, however the subgroup showing mild symptoms showed significantly larger improvement in HD symptoms as compared with CG.The intervention proved overall positive effects on severity of HD symptoms, supporting the benefits of skin care in the workplace. The fact that the intervention showed a larger effect in a subgroup with mild symptoms suggests that this intervention might be of particular importance for primary prevention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-102
Author(s):  
Anca E. Chiriac ◽  
Doina Azoicai ◽  
Uwe Wollina ◽  
Anca Chiriac ◽  
Cristian Podoleanu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hand eczema, in time of COVID-19, is one of the most frequently diagnosed skin disorders in nurses. In this study, we sought to investigate whether smoking could be an additional risk factor for hand eczema in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: Using a questionnaire about smoking details and hand eczema, we conducted a study among nurses involved in the frontline management of COVID-19 patients. A total of 1,000 questionnaires were sent out. The questionnaires were anonymous and based on self-reported answers, with no clinical examination or medical data evaluation. All nurses enrolled in the study were women, working in shifts for the last three months since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Two-hundred forty-seven questionnaires were accepted for the study, after eliminating non-responders and nurses without hand eczema. The majority of nurses denied smoking (87.85%) in the past and at the moment of the study. Statistics related to years of smoking and occurrence of hand eczema showed no increase in the number of cases in correlation with the number of years of smoking. Similarly, a random distribution of cases of hand eczema was observed when compared to the number of cigarettes per day. Conclusion: Our data does not support the hypothesis that smoking is an independent risk factor for the development of occupational hand eczema during the COVID-19 pandemic.


BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (dec12 1) ◽  
pp. e8370-e8370 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Thomas ◽  
J. English

2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina S. Ibler ◽  
Gregor B. E. Jemec ◽  
Tove Agner

Author(s):  
Vivien Hunot ◽  
Theresa HM Moore ◽  
Deborah Caldwell ◽  
Philippa Davies ◽  
Hannah Jones ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document