Switching stories: user testimonials on juul.com continue to contradict JUUL’s switch ≠ cessation narrative

2020 ◽  
pp. tobaccocontrol-2020-055816
Author(s):  
Joanne G Patterson ◽  
Devin T LaPolt ◽  
Alexis R Miranda ◽  
Patricia J Zettler ◽  
Micah Berman ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn January 2019, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) market leader Juul Labs (JUUL) launched an advertising campaign encouraging adult smokers to ‘make the switch’ from combustible cigarettes to JUUL. Our primary aim was to describe consumer perceptions of JUUL as communicated by members of JUUL’s online social community via testimonials promoted on JUUL’s website.MethodsUser testimonials that were displayed on the JUUL website in December 2019 and January 2020 were collected and coded by three reviewers. A total of 220 testimonials were coded for primary and secondary themes (eight codes within four broader themes).ResultsTestimonial writers were, on average, 43.0 years old (range 28 to 74) and reported using JUUL for an average of 21.8 months (range 9 to 59 months). The most prominent theme, present in nearly half of the testimonials, was a description of how to use JUUL, with a mention of JUUL’s benefits and tips on how to use the product. Nearly four in 10 statements encouraged smokers to give JUUL a try or noted that JUUL is a better product compared with cigarettes. About one in 10 statements focused on switching from smoking cigarettes to using JUUL.ConclusionThis study presents a foundation for understanding how adult users describe JUUL, including their experiences using JUUL to ‘switch’ or stop smoking. Currently, the effectiveness of ENDS for smoking cessation is not supported by substantial evidence; however, if cessation is defined as ‘quitting combustible tobacco products’, then regulators should be aware that switch and cessation messages may not be distinct.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e045724
Author(s):  
Ivan Berlin ◽  
Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski ◽  
Jean-Paul Humair ◽  
Jacques Cornuz

ObjectivesTo provide a consensus from a panel of international experts about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTP).DesignCross-sectional survey.MethodsA Delphi survey was conducted among international experts in tobacco control and smoking cessation. The first part addressed statements or recommendations about ENDS, the second about HTP, both divided into four categories: regulation, sale, use and general issues.SettingExperts from 15 countries.ParticipantsIndividuals with clinical, public health or research expertise in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation.Results268 experts were contacted, 92 (34%) completed the first, 55/92 (60%) the second round. Consensus for ENDS: components of e-liquids, an upper limit of nicotine concentration should be defined; a warning on the lack of evidence in long-term safety and addiction potential should be stated; ENDS should not be regulated as consumer products but either as a new category of nicotine delivery or tobacco products; ENDS should not be sold in general stores but in specialised shops, shops selling tobacco or in pharmacies with restriction on sale to minors; administration of illegal drugs is likely with ENDS. Consensus for HTP: HTP have the same addictive potential as cigarettes; they should be regulated as a tobacco product with similar warning messages as cigarettes; their advertisement should not be allowed. ENDS and HTP use should not be allowed in indoor public places; a specific tax should be implemented for ENDS, taxes on HTP should not be lower than those for cigarettes; use of cigarettes is more likely with both ENDS and HTP (dual use) than quitting smoking.ConclusionsExperts in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation recommend differential regulation for ENDS and HTP. The results of this survey may be useful for health authorities, decision makers and researchers of the tobacco use and cessation field.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (S1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Kaufman ◽  
Margaret Mahoney

E-cigarettes, sometimes referred to as ENDS (Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems), include a broad range of products that deliver nicotine via heating and aerosolization of the drug. ENDS come in a variety of forms, but regardless of form generally consist of a solution containing humectant (e.g., propylene glycol or glycerol), flavorings, and usually nicotine (some solutions do not contain nicotine); a battery-powered coil that heats the solution into an aerosol (usually referred to as vapor) in an atomizing chamber; and a mouthpiece through which the user draws the vapor into the mouth and lungs. The devices may be closed systems containing prefilled cartridges, or open systems, where the user manually refills a 1-2 ml. tank with solution. What started as closed-system cigarette-shaped devices marketed as an adjunct for smoking cessation, has transitioned rapidly to literally thousands of hip and funky-designed open-system hookah pens, vape pens, and modifiable devices. For younger people, these forms are the “in” thing, while traditional cigarette-shaped devices are “out.”


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janette K. Merrill ◽  
Anthony J. Alberg ◽  
John R. Goffin ◽  
Suresh S. Ramalingam ◽  
Vani Nath Simmons ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (e2) ◽  
pp. e127-e129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Suchanek Hudmon ◽  
Nervana Elkhadragy ◽  
Zuzana Kusynová ◽  
Luc Besançon ◽  
Tina Penick Brock ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document