The Impact of Aerobic Training Periodisation on Global and Regional Right Ventricular Strain in Coronary Heart Disease

Author(s):  
Lukas Daniel Trachsel ◽  
Louis-Philippe David ◽  
Mathieu Gayda ◽  
Maxime Boidin ◽  
Julie Lalongé ◽  
...  

Objective:Linear aerobic training periodisation (LP) is recommended in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the effects of training periodisation on right heart mechanics in CHD patients have never been examined. This study aimed to explore the effects of LP and non-linear periodisation (NLP) on right heart mechanics. Methods: We prospectively randomised CHD patients to 12 weeks aerobic training with LP or NLP. Whereas there was a weekly increase in energy expenditure with LP, there was a steeper increase during the first 3 weeks followed by a decrease the fourth week with NLP. Echocardiography at baseline and after the training period was performed to assess right ventricular free wall (RVFW) and right atrial strain. Results: Thirty CHD patients were included (NLP, n=16; LP, n=14). Traditional right and left heart parameters showed no significant time effect. There was a decrease of RVFW strain with time in both groups (+1.3±0.9% with NLP, and +1.5±0.8% with LP; p=0.033). Mid-ventricular RVFW strain changed significantly with time (+2.0±1.3% with NLP, and from +2.3±1.2% with LP; p=0.025). There was no time effect on right atrial strain. Conclusions: In stable CHD patients, LP and NLP resulted in right ventricular strain decrements with a segment-specific pattern. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier number: NCT03414996). Novelty: • In stable coronary heart disease patients, both linear and non-linear aerobic training periodisation programs result in right ventricular strain decrements with time, particularly in the mid-ventricular segment • Traditional right and left heart parameters, and right atrial strain showed no significant time effect in both 12 weeks aerobic training periodisation programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 297-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Bellavia ◽  
Attilio Iacovoni ◽  
Valentina Agnese ◽  
Calogero Falletta ◽  
Claudia Coronnello ◽  
...  

Background: Identifying candidates for left ventricular assist device surgery at risk of right ventricular failure remains difficult. The aim was to identify the most accurate predictors of right ventricular failure among clinical, biological, and imaging markers, assessed by agreement of different supervised machine learning algorithms. Methods: Seventy-four patients, referred to HeartWare left ventricular assist device since 2010 in two Italian centers, were recruited. Biomarkers, right ventricular standard, and strain echocardiography, as well as cath-lab measures, were compared among patients who did not develop right ventricular failure (N = 56), those with acute–right ventricular failure (N = 8, 11%) or chronic–right ventricular failure (N = 10, 14%). Logistic regression, penalized logistic regression, linear support vector machines, and naïve Bayes algorithms with leave-one-out validation were used to evaluate the efficiency of any combination of three collected variables in an “all-subsets” approach. Results: Michigan risk score combined with central venous pressure assessed invasively and apical longitudinal systolic strain of the right ventricular–free wall were the most significant predictors of acute–right ventricular failure (maximum receiver operating characteristic–area under the curve = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = 0.91–1.00, by the naïve Bayes), while the right ventricular–free wall systolic strain of the middle segment, right atrial strain (QRS-synced), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion were the most significant predictors of Chronic-RVF (receiver operating characteristic–area under the curve = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.91–1.00, according to naïve Bayes). Conclusion: Apical right ventricular strain as well as right atrial strain provides complementary information, both critical to predict acute–right ventricular failure and chronic–right ventricular failure, respectively.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S55-S56
Author(s):  
Brian Lafferty ◽  
P. McCall ◽  
B. Shelley

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii161-ii163
Author(s):  
R. Enache ◽  
N. Sawada ◽  
L. Molina Ferragut ◽  
P. Monney ◽  
A. Jobbe Duval ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document