What do we actually know about the proton radius?

1999 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
S G Karshenboim

This paper considers the different determinations of the proton charge radius. It demonstrates that the results from the elastic electron-proton scattering have to be assigned a higher uncertainty. A review of the hydrogen Lamb-shift measurements and the radius determination from them is also presented.PACS No.: 27.10 and 35.10B

Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 365 (6457) ◽  
pp. 1007-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Bezginov ◽  
T. Valdez ◽  
M. Horbatsch ◽  
A. Marsman ◽  
A. C. Vutha ◽  
...  

The surprising discrepancy between results from different methods for measuring the proton charge radius is referred to as the proton radius puzzle. In particular, measurements using electrons seem to lead to a different radius compared with those using muons. Here, a direct measurement of the n = 2 Lamb shift of atomic hydrogen is presented. Our measurement determines the proton radius to be rp = 0.833 femtometers, with an uncertainty of ±0.010 femtometers. This electron-based measurement of rp agrees with that obtained from the analogous muon-based Lamb shift measurement but is not consistent with the larger radius that was obtained from the averaging of previous electron-based measurements.


Nature ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 575 (7781) ◽  
pp. 147-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Xiong ◽  
A. Gasparian ◽  
H. Gao ◽  
D. Dutta ◽  
M. Khandaker ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Pohl ◽  
A Antognini ◽  
F D Amaro ◽  
F Biraben ◽  
J MR Cardoso ◽  
...  

The charge radius of the proton, the simplest nucleus, is known from electron-scattering experiments only with a surprisingly low precision of about 2%. The poor knowledge of the proton charge radius restricts tests of bound-state quantum electrodynamics (QED) to the precision level of about 6 × 10–6, although the experimental data themselves (1S Lamb shift in hydrogen) have reached a precision of 2 × 10–6. The determination of the proton charge radius with an accuracy of 10–3 is the main goal of our experiment, opening a way to check bound-state QED predictions to a level of 10–7. The principle is to measure the 2S–2P energy difference in muonic hydrogen (µ–p) by infrared laser spectroscopy. The first data were taken in the second half of 2003. Muons from our unique very-low-energy muon beam are stopped at a rate of ~100 s–1 in 0.6 mbar H2 gas where the lifetime of the formed µp(2S) atoms is about 1.3 µs. An incoming muon triggers a pulsed multistage laser system that delivers ~0.2 mJ at λ ≈ 6 µm. Following the laser excitation µp(2S) → µp(2P) we observe the 1.9 keV X-rays from 2P–1S transitions using large area avalanche photodiodes. The resonance frequency, and, hence, the Lamb shift and the proton radius, is determined by measuring the intensity of these X-rays as a function of the laser wavelength. A broad range of laser frequencies was scanned in 2003 and the analysis is currently under way. PACS Nos.: 36.10.Dr, 14.20.Dh, 42.62.Fi


2007 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Nebel ◽  
F D Amaro ◽  
A Antognini ◽  
F Biraben ◽  
J MR Cardoso ◽  
...  

The Lamb-shift experiment in muonic hydrogen (μ– p) aims to measure the energy difference between the [Formula: see text] atomic levels to a precision of 30 ppm. This would allow the r.m.s. proton charge radius rp to be deduced to a precision of 10–3 and open a way to check bound-state quantum electrodynamics (QED) to a level of 10–7. The poor knowledge of the proton charge radius restricts tests of bound-state QED to the precision level of about 6 × 10–6, although the experimental data themselves (Lamb-shift in hydrogen) have reached a precision of  × 10–6. Values for rp not depending on bound-state QED results from electron scattering experiments have a surprisingly large uncertainty of 2%. In our Lamb-shift experiment, low-energy negative muons are stopped in low-density hydrogen gas, where, following the μ– atomic capture and cascade, 1% of the muonic hydrogen atoms form the metastable 2S state with a lifetime of about 1 μs. A laser pulse at λ ≈ 6 μm is used to drive the 2S → 2P transition. Following the laser excitation, we observe the 1.9 keV X-ray being emitted during the subsequent de-excitation to the 1S state using large-area avalanche photodiodes. The resonance frequency and, hence, the Lamb shift and the proton charge radius are determined by measuring the intensity of the X-ray fluorescence as a function of the laser wavelength. The results of the run in December 2003 were negative but, nevertheless, promising. One by-product of the 2003 run was the first observation of the short-lived 2S component in muonic hydrogen. Currently, improvements in the laser-system, the experimental apparatus, and the data acquisition are being implemented. PACS Nos.: 36.10.Dr, 14.20.Dh, 42.62.Fi


2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randolf Pohl ◽  
Aldo Antognini ◽  
François Nez ◽  
Fernando D. Amaro ◽  
François Biraben ◽  
...  

The long quest for a measurement of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen is over. Last year we measured the 2S 1/2F=1 –2P 3/2F=2 energy splitting (Pohl et al., Nature, 466, 213 (2010)) in μp with an experimental accuracy of 15 ppm, twice better than our proposed goal. Using current QED calculations of the fine, hyperfine, QED, and finite size contributions, we obtain a root-mean-square proton charge radius of rp = 0.841 84 (67) fm. This value is 10 times more precise, but 5 standard deviations smaller, than the 2006 CODATA value of rp. The origin of this discrepancy is not known. Our measurement, together with precise measurements of the 1S–2S transition in regular hydrogen and deuterium, gives improved values of the Rydberg constant, R∞ = 10 973 731.568 160 (16) m–1 and the rms charge radius of the deuteron rd = 2.128 09 (31) fm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document