EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON THE ACID-CATALYZED ENOLIZATION OF ACETONE AND ACETOPHENONE IN VARIOUS ETHANOL–WATER SOLVENTS. ORIGIN OF THE ENTHALPY–ENTROPY COMPENSATION EFFECT

1964 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1835-1850 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. T. Baliga ◽  
E. Whalley

The effect of pressure, temperature, and solvent composition on the rate of the acid-catalyzed enolization of acetone and acetophenone, and the solvent deuterium isotope effect for the enolization of acetophenone, have been measured by following the iodination. The solvent deuterium isotope effect [Formula: see text] for the enolization of acetophenone in 16.2% w/w ethanol–water is 2.50 ± ~0.05, which undoubtedly proves that there is a pre-equilibrium proton transfer. The effect of solvent in the range water to 33.4% w/w ethanol in water on the rate of enolization of both acetone and acetophenone is small at atmospheric pressure, but is about four times larger at 3 kbar. This cannot be explained on simple electrostatic grounds, and indicates that any simple electrostatic explanation of the solvent effect at atmospheric pressure is invalid. The volumes of activation for the enolizations are strongly dependent on the solvent, that for acetone varying from −2.l ± ~0.5 to −6.9 ± ~ 0.7 cm3 mole−1 between solvents water and 33.4% w/w ethanol in water.An examination has been made of the enthalpyentropy compensation effect. It is shown that in general if the rate or equilibrium constant of a reaction does not change with changing conditions (such as solvent, substituents, etc.) then either the quantities of activation at constant pressure, ΔHp≠ and ΔSp≠, or the corresponding quantities at constant volume, ΔUv≠ and ΔSv≠, must vary in a compensating manner, and the existence of an energy–entropy compensation effect is inevitable. For the enolization of acetone and acetophenone in ethanol–water mixtures, ΔUv≠ and ΔSv≠ vary only slightly with solvent, whereas ΔHp≠ and ΔSp≠ vary in a compensating manner. The main causes of the compensation effect in the constant-pressure parameters are, in a sense, the change with changing solvent of the thermal expansion of the solvent and of the volume of activation of the reaction. On the other hand, both the constant-pressure and the constant-volume parameters vary with substituent from acetone to acetophenone, and the constant-volume parameters vary the more.


1970 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 2021-2024 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Gay ◽  
E. Whalley

The effect of pressure up to 1.6 kbar on the rate of solvolysis of benzyl chloride in 0 to 75% v/v glycerol–water has been measured at 50 °C. The volume of activation is −10.7 ± ~ 0.4 cm3 mole−1, essentially independent of solvent composition. Therefore, the partial volumes of both benzyl chloride and the transition state depend on solvent composition in the same way. The constant-volume energy and entropy of activation are simple functions of the solvent composition, and resemble the constant-volume parameters in ethanol–water mixtures. It is concluded that constant-volume conditions are probably more appropriate than constant-pressure conditions for discussing the solvent dependence of these solvolyses.



1830 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 209-214

It has been demonstrated by the ever-to-be-lamented Laplace, that in order to obtain the velocity of sound by calculation, Sir Isaac Newton’s original expression†, V = √ g · p /D, must be multiplied by the square root of the ratio between the specific heats of atmospheric air under a constant pressure and under a constant volume. In this formula V is the velocity of sound, g the intensity of gravitating force, p the atmospheric pressure, and D the density of the medium through which sound is transmitted; the density of mercury being equal to 1. The coefficient, which is to multiply the Newtonian formula, has been deduced by M. Laplace, first from MM. Laroche and Berardo’s ‡ experiments, next from those of MM. Clement and Desormes§, and finally from the more accurate investigations of MM. Gay-Lussac and Welter.





1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 845-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloslav Šorm ◽  
Miloslav Procházka ◽  
Jaroslav Kálal

The course of hydrolysis of an ester, 4-acetoxy-3-nitrobenzoic acid catalyzed with poly(1-methyl-3-allylimidazolium bromide) (IIa), poly[l-methyl-3-(2-propinyl)imidazolium chloride] (IIb) and poly[l-methyl-3-(2-methacryloyloxyethyl)imidazolium bromide] (IIc) in a 28.5% aqueous ethanol was investigated as a function of pH and compared with low-molecular weight models, viz., l-methyl-3-alkylimidazolium bromides (the alkyl group being methyl, propyl, and hexyl, resp). Polymers IIb, IIc possessed a higher activity at pH above 9, while the models were more active at a lower pH with a maximum at pH 7.67. The catalytic activity at the higher pH is attributed to an attack by the OH- group, while at the lower pH it is assigned to a direct attack of water on the substrate. The rate of hydrolysis of 4-acetoxy-3-nitrobenzoic acid is proportional to the catalyst concentration [IIc] and proceeds as a first-order reaction. The hydrolysis depends on the composition of the solvent and was highest at 28.5% (vol.) of ethanol in water. The hydrolysis of a neutral ester, 4-nitrophenyl acetate, was not accelerated by IIc.





1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (26) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. MAEDA ◽  
Y. SUNAOKA ◽  
H. KAKIHANA




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document