SOIL IMPROVEMENT USING A COMBINED VACUUM AND FILL SURCHARGE PRELOADING METHOD

Author(s):  
JIAN CHU ◽  
SHUWANG YAN
2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 1094-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.-W Yan ◽  
J Chu

This paper presents a case study of using the combined vacuum and fill surcharge preloading method to improve the foundation soil for a storage yard at Tianjin Port, China. A vacuum load of 80 kPa was applied for 4-8 weeks before fill surcharge was added in stages. The site to be improved was recently reclaimed using dredged clay slurry. Both the consolidated clay slurry fill and the seabed soils were very soft. After the combined vacuum and fill surcharge preloading, the ground settled more than 1 m. The average degree of consolidation achieved was more than 80%. The undrained shear strength of the soil increased twofold. The water content of the soil also decreased substantially. The soil improvement procedure using the combined vacuum and fill surcharge preloading method and the instrumentation scheme are described, the field monitoring data are presented and analyzed, and methods to estimate the degree of consolidation and several other issues related to the combined preloading method are discussed.Key words: case history, consolidation, ground improvement.


2012 ◽  
Vol 209-211 ◽  
pp. 1459-1462
Author(s):  
Shang Yu Han ◽  
Li Hong

The consolidation effect of vacuum combined with fill surcharge preloading always influenced by many factors including vacuum pressure, vertical load pressure and vertical drainage depth. As the way to improve the reliability of the method, based on the soil consolidation mechanisms and actual data getting from the laboratory test and in-situ test, the main indexes of the method were studied in this paper. The test results show that the ratio of the vacuum pressure and vertical load pressure can cause difference soil settlement-deformation, if the ratio close to 1 the consolidation effect of the foundation can be gradually advanced. The soil outside the embankment always has displacement to reinforcement region in the upper depth of the foundation soil when the vacuum pressure equals to the vertical load pressure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Intan Kamila Adiba ◽  
Januar Fery Irawan ◽  
Luthfi Amri Wicaksono

The use of the preloading method, which combined with PVD, is now a common method of soil improvement that proved effective in increasing bearing capacity and reducing settlement on soft soil ground types like former rice fields. In order to reach an optimum effectiveness of soil improvement, an evaluation of the settlement should be done by reviewing the performance of soil improvement along with geotechnical instruments installed in the field. In this study, the back analysis method is used to determine the soil design parameters that are following the actual conditions in the field. The results obtained from the evaluation of settlement conducted is the difference between settlement calculation theoretically before the improvement of soil with the available field data of monitoring Settlement Plate. An average percentage of 118% was obtained from the calculation. In contrast, an average percentage of 2.87% was obtained as the difference between the final settlement prediction of Asaoka's with actual settlements based on Settlement Plate readings data in the field. The parameters of the soil results from the back analysis gave new values with each of the average of Ch= 0.02936; Cc= 0.27313; kv= 0.00005 m/day; and mv= 0.00064m2/kN. The difference between theoretical settlement recalculated using the soil parameter of the back analysis method with the actual settlement based on monitoring of Settlement Plate gave an average percentage of 12.66%. Metode Preloading yang dikombinasikan dengan PVD merupakan salah satu metode perbaikan tanah yang terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan daya dukung tanah dan mengurangi settlement pada tanah jenis lunak seperti tanah bekas sawah. Agar perbaikan tanah yang dilakukan memiliki efektifitas optimum, perlu adanya evaluasi terhadap settlement yang terjadi dengan meninjau kinerja perbaikan tanah beserta instrumeninstrumen geoteknik yang terpasang di lapangan. Selain itu, dilakukan Metode Analisa Balik untuk mengetahui parameter desain tanah yang sesuai dengan keadaan sesungguhnya di lapangan. Hasil yang didapatkan dari evaluasi settlement yang dilakukan adalah selisih settlement secara teoritis sebelum adanya perbaikan tanah dengan settlement berdasarkan monitoring Settlement Plate di lapangan dalam persentase rata-rata sebesar 118%, sedangkan selisih antara final settlement prediksi Asaoka dengan settlement akhir berdasarkan monitoring Settlement Plate di lapangan mendapatkan persentase rata-rata sebesar 2,15%. Parameter-parameter tanah hasil dari analisa balik memiliki nilai baru dengan masing-masing rata-rata sebesar Ch= 0,02936; Cc= 0,27313; kv= 0,00005 m/hari; dan mv= 0,00064m2 /kN. Sedangkan untuk selisih antara settlement secara teoritis yang dihitung kembali menggunakan parameter tanah hasil analisa balik dengan settlement aktual berdasarkan data bacaan Settlement Plate mendapatkan persentase rata-rata sebesar 12,66%.


2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 258-264
Author(s):  
Ming Lei Shi ◽  
Rui Kun Zhang ◽  
Hao Zhang

Based on the theory of the Terzaghi 1-D consolidation and the linear compressibility of soil, a rational method for regionalization of recompression and compression in the distribution of the excess pore-water pressure under overloading-unloading was presented. A simple generalized expression of the ground settlement rate applied to insufficient-load preloading, equal-load preloading, surcharge preloading and a time expression of insufficient-load preloading, surcharge preloading relative to equal-load preloading were further derived. The relationship mechanism of settlement rate and time of insufficient-load preloading, surcharge preloading relative to equal-load preloading are discussed based on the same allowed post-construction settlement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document