ON THE DESCRIPTIONAL COMPLEXITY OF LINDENMAYER SYSTEMS

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 663-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
JÜRGEN DASSOW

We define the number of productions and the number of symbols as measures of descriptional complexity for tabled interactionless Lindenmayer systems and their special cases. We investigate the decrease of the descriptional complexities if we go from a family to another one which has a larger generative capacity.

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 99-114
Author(s):  
RONNY HARBICH ◽  
BIANCA TRUTHE

We investigate the descriptional complexity of limited Lindenmayer systems and their deterministic and tabled variants with respect to the number of rules and the number of symbols. In this part, we confine ourselves to propagating limited Lindenmayer systems. We determine the decrease of complexity when the generative capacity is increased. For incomparable families, we give languages that can be described more efficiently in either of these families than in the other.


2021 ◽  
Vol 180 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 123-150
Author(s):  
Bianca Truthe

A contextual grammar is a language generating mechanism inspired by generating sentences in natural languages. An existing string can be extended to a new string of the language by adjoining a context before and behind the string or by inserting it into the string around some subword. The first mode is called external derivation whereas the second mode is called internal derivation. If conditions are given, around which words which contexts can be adjoined, we speak about contextual grammars with selection. We give an overview about the generative capacity of contextual grammars (working externally or internally) where the selection languages belong to subregular language classes. All languages generated by contextual grammars where all selection languages are elements of a certain subregular language family form again a language family. We compare such families which are based on finite, monoidal, nilpotent, combinational, definite, suffix-closed, ordered, commutative, circular, non-counting, power-separating, or union-free languages, or based on languages defined by restrictions regarding the descriptional complexity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning Fernau ◽  
Lakshmanan Kuppusamy ◽  
Indhumathi Raman

AbstractA matrix insertion-deletion system (or matrix ins-del system) is described by a set of insertion-deletion rules presented in matrix form, which demands all rules of a matrix to be applied in the given order. These systems were introduced to model very simplistic fragments of sequential programs based on insertion and deletion as elementary operations as can be found in biocomputing. We are investigating such systems with limited resources as formalized in descriptional complexity. A traditional descriptional complexity measure of such a matrix ins-del system is its size $$s=(k;n,i',i'';m,j',j'')$$ s = ( k ; n , i ′ , i ′ ′ ; m , j ′ , j ′ ′ ) , where the parameters from left to right represent the maximal matrix length, maximal insertion string length, maximal length of left contexts in insertion rules, maximal length of right contexts in insertion rules; the last three are deletion counterparts of the previous three parameters. We call the sum $$n+i'+i''+m+j'+j''$$ n + i ′ + i ′ ′ + m + j ′ + j ′ ′ the sum-norm of s. We show that matrix ins-del systems of sum-norm 4 and sizes (3; 1, 0, 0;  1, 2, 0), (3; 1, 0, 0;  1, 0, 2), (2; 1, 2, 0;  1, 0, 0), (2; 1, 0, 2;  1, 0, 0), and (2; 1, 1, 1;  1, 0, 0) describe the recursively enumerable languages. Moreover, matrix ins-del systems of sizes (3; 1, 1, 0;  1, 0, 0), (3; 1, 0, 1;  1, 0, 0), (2; 2, 1, 0;  1, 0, 0) and (2; 2, 0, 1;  1, 0, 0) can describe at least the regular closure of the linear languages. In fact, we show that if a matrix ins-del system of size s can describe the class of linear languages $$\mathrm {LIN}$$ LIN , then without any additional resources, matrix ins-del systems of size s also describe the regular closure of $$\mathrm {LIN}$$ LIN . Finally, we prove that matrix ins-del systems of sizes (2; 1, 1, 0;  1, 1, 0) and (2; 1, 0, 1;  1, 0, 1) can describe at least the regular languages.


1993 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
JÜRGEN DASSOW ◽  
GHEORGHE PAUN ◽  
ARTO SALOMAA

Some new generative devices are defined, called pattern grammars, starting from the way of identifying a language by a pattern in [2,5] (they can be viewed also as a generalization of Marcus contextual grammars [6]). The generative capacity of these grammars is investigated (compared mainly with L-language families), as well as closure, decision and descriptional complexity questions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (2-3-4) ◽  
pp. 127-151
Author(s):  
Markus Holzer ◽  
Bianca Truthe ◽  
Ahmad Firdaus Yosman

We introduce a new variant of insertion systems, namely bonded insertion systems. In such systems, words are not only formed by usual letters but also by bonds between letters. Words which can be inserted, have “free” bonds at their ends which control at which positions in a word they can be inserted (namely only there, where the bonds “fit”). Two kinds of bonded insertion systems are defined in this paper: so-called bonded sequential insertion systems and bonded parallel insertion systems. In a sequential system, there is only one word inserted at a time. In a parallel system, there is a word inserted at every possible position in parallel in one time step. We investigate the generative capacity of those two kinds and relate the families of generated languages to some families of the Chomsky hierarchy and to families of languages generated by Lindenmayer systems. Additionally, we investigate some closure properties.


Author(s):  
M. Isaacson ◽  
M.L. Collins ◽  
M. Listvan

Over the past five years it has become evident that radiation damage provides the fundamental limit to the study of blomolecular structure by electron microscopy. In some special cases structural determinations at very low doses can be achieved through superposition techniques to study periodic (Unwin & Henderson, 1975) and nonperiodic (Saxton & Frank, 1977) specimens. In addition, protection methods such as glucose embedding (Unwin & Henderson, 1975) and maintenance of specimen hydration at low temperatures (Taylor & Glaeser, 1976) have also shown promise. Despite these successes, the basic nature of radiation damage in the electron microscope is far from clear. In general we cannot predict exactly how different structures will behave during electron Irradiation at high dose rates. Moreover, with the rapid rise of analytical electron microscopy over the last few years, nvicroscopists are becoming concerned with questions of compositional as well as structural integrity. It is important to measure changes in elemental composition arising from atom migration in or loss from the specimen as a result of electron bombardment.


Author(s):  
H. Bethge

Besides the atomic surface structure, diverging in special cases with respect to the bulk structure, the real structure of a surface Is determined by the step structure. Using the decoration technique /1/ it is possible to image step structures having step heights down to a single lattice plane distance electron-microscopically. For a number of problems the knowledge of the monatomic step structures is important, because numerous problems of surface physics are directly connected with processes taking place at these steps, e.g. crystal growth or evaporation, sorption and nucleatlon as initial stage of overgrowth of thin films.To demonstrate the decoration technique by means of evaporation of heavy metals Fig. 1 from our former investigations shows the monatomic step structure of an evaporated NaCI crystal. of special Importance Is the detection of the movement of steps during the growth or evaporation of a crystal. From the velocity of a step fundamental quantities for the molecular processes can be determined, e.g. the mean free diffusion path of molecules.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document