New Dynamic Multi-Objective Constrained Optimization Evolutionary Algorithm

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (05) ◽  
pp. 1550036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-An Liu ◽  
Yuping Wang ◽  
Aihong Ren
Keyword(s):  
Constrained Optimization ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Constrained Optimization Problem ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Pareto Fronts

For dynamic multi-objective constrained optimization problem (DMCOP), it is important to find a sufficient number of uniformly distributed and representative dynamic Pareto optimal solutions. In this paper, the time period of the DMCOP is first divided into several random subperiods. In each random subperiod, the DMCOP is approximately regarded as a static optimization problem by taking the time subperiod fixed. Then, in order to decrease the amount of computation and improve the effectiveness of the algorithm, the dynamic multi-objective constrained optimization problem is further transformed into a dynamic bi-objective constrained optimization problem based on the dynamic mean rank variance and dynamic mean density variance of the evolution population. The evolution operators and a self-check operator which can automatically checkout the change of time parameter are introduced to solve the optimization problem efficiently. And finally, a dynamic multi-objective constrained optimization evolutionary algorithm is proposed. Also, the convergence analysis for the proposed algorithm is given. The computer simulations are made on four dynamic multi-objective optimization test functions and the results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can effectively track and find the varying Pareto optimal solutions or the varying Pareto fronts with the change of time.

Evaluating the ε-Domination Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for a Quick Computation of Pareto-Optimal Solutions

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalyanmoy Deb ◽  
Manikanth Mohan ◽  
Shikhar Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective

Since the suggestion of a computing procedure of multiple Pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization problems in the early Nineties, researchers have been on the look out for a procedure which is computationally fast and simultaneously capable of finding a well-converged and well-distributed set of solutions. Most multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) developed in the past decade are either good for achieving a well-distributed solutions at the expense of a large computational effort or computationally fast at the expense of achieving a not-so-good distribution of solutions. For example, although the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm or SPEA (Zitzler and Thiele, 1999) produces a much better distribution compared to the elitist non-dominated sorting GA or NSGA-II (Deb et al., 2002a), the computational time needed to run SPEA is much greater. In this paper, we evaluate a recently-proposed steady-state MOEA (Deb et al., 2003) which was developed based on the ε-dominance concept introduced earlier (Laumanns et al., 2002) and using efficient parent and archive update strategies for achieving a well-distributed and well-converged set of solutions quickly. Based on an extensive comparative study with four other state-of-the-art MOEAs on a number of two, three, and four objective test problems, it is observed that the steady-state MOEA is a good compromise in terms of convergence near to the Pareto-optimal front, diversity of solutions, and computational time. Moreover, the ε-MOEA is a step closer towards making MOEAs pragmatic, particularly allowing a decision-maker to control the achievable accuracy in the obtained Pareto-optimal solutions.

Solving Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization Problems by Kriging Model with Multi-Point Updating Strategy

2014 ◽  
Vol 685 ◽  
pp. 667-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ding Han ◽  
Jian Rong Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Average Distance ◽  
Kriging Model ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Good Convergence ◽  
Multi Objective

A method which utilizes Kriging model and a multi-point updating strategy is put forward for solving expensive multi-objective optimization problems. Assisted by a defined cheaper multi-objective optimization problem and a maximum average distance criterion, multiple updating points can be found. The proposed method is tested on two numerical functions and a ten-bar truss problem, the results show that the proposed method is efficient in obtaining Pareto optimal solutions with good convergence and diversity when the same computation resource is used comparing with two other methods.

ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL DISPATCH BY A MODE TECHNIQUE

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. PANIGRAHI ◽  
R. CHAKRABARTI ◽  
P. K. CHATTOPADHYAY
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Sample Test ◽  
Optimal Set ◽  
Mode Technique

Multi-objective differential evolution (MODE) is proposed to handle economic environmental dispatch problem, which is a multi-objective optimization problem (MOOPs) with competing and noncommensurable objectives. The proposed approach has a good performance in finding a diverse set of solutions and in converging near the true Pareto-optimal set. Numerical results for two sample test systems have been presented to demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed approach to generate well-distributed Pareto-optimal solutions of economic environmental dispatch problem in one single run. Simulation results with the proposed approach have been validated with Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II.

scholarly journals Two-Step Many-Objective Optimal Power Flow Based on Knee Point-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm

Processes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahui Li ◽  
Yang Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Power Flow ◽  
Optimal Power Flow ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Power ◽  
Knee Point

To coordinate the economy, security and environment protection in the power system operation, a two-step many-objective optimal power flow (MaOPF) solution method is proposed. In step 1, it is the first time that knee point-driven evolutionary algorithm (KnEA) is introduced to address the MaOPF problem, and thereby the Pareto-optimal solutions can be obtained. In step 2, an integrated decision analysis technique is utilized to provide decision makers with decision supports by combining fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering and grey relational projection (GRP) method together. In this way, the best compromise solutions (BCSs) that represent decision makers’ different, even conflicting, preferences can be automatically determined from the set of Pareto-optimal solutions. The primary contribution of the proposal is the innovative application of many-objective optimization together with decision analysis for addressing MaOPF problems. Through examining the two-step method via the IEEE 118-bus system and the real-world Hebei provincial power system, it is verified that our approach is suitable for addressing the MaOPF problem of power systems.

scholarly journals Evaluation Method of Multiobjective Functions’ Combination and Its Application in Hydrological Model Evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiuyuan Huo ◽  
Liqun Liu
Keyword(s):  
Objective Function ◽  
Parameter Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Hydrological Forecasting ◽  
Model Parameter Optimization

Parameter optimization of a hydrological model is intrinsically a high dimensional, nonlinear, multivariable, combinatorial optimization problem which involves a set of different objectives. Currently, the assessment of optimization results for the hydrological model is usually made through calculations and comparisons of objective function values of simulated and observed variables. Thus, the proper selection of objective functions’ combination for model parameter optimization has an important impact on the hydrological forecasting. There exist various objective functions, and how to analyze and evaluate the objective function combinations for selecting the optimal parameters has not been studied in depth. Therefore, to select the proper objective function combination which can balance the trade-off among various design objectives and achieve the overall best benefit, a simple and convenient framework for the comparison of the influence of different objective function combinations on the optimization results is urgently needed. In this paper, various objective functions related to parameters optimization of hydrological models were collected from the literature and constructed to nine combinations. Then, a selection and evaluation framework of objective functions is proposed for hydrological model parameter optimization, in which a multiobjective artificial bee colony algorithm named RMOABC is employed to optimize the hydrological model and obtain the Pareto optimal solutions. The parameter optimization problem of the Xinanjiang hydrological model was taken as the application case for long-term runoff prediction in the Heihe River basin. Finally, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) based on the entropy theory is adapted to sort the Pareto optimal solutions to compare these combinations of objective functions and obtain the comprehensive optimal objective functions’ combination. The experiments results demonstrate that the combination 2 of objective functions can provide more comprehensive and reliable dominant options (i.e., parameter sets) for practical hydrological forecasting in the study area. The entropy-based method has been proved that it is effective to analyze and evaluate the performance of different combinations of objective functions and can provide more comprehensive and impersonal decision support for hydrological forecasting.

scholarly journals Single- and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Dual-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell Operating in Continuous-Flow Mode at Steady State

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 839
Author(s):  
Ibrahim M. Abu-Reesh
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Dual Chamber ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Conflicting Objectives

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are a promising technology for bioenergy generation and wastewater treatment. Various parameters affect the performance of dual-chamber MFCs, such as substrate flow rate and concentration. Performance can be assessed by power density ( PD ), current density ( CD ) production, or substrate removal efficiency ( SRE ). In this study, a mathematical model-based optimization was used to optimize the performance of an MFC using single- and multi-objective optimization (MOO) methods. Matlab’s fmincon and fminimax functions were used to solve the nonlinear constrained equations for the single- and multi-objective optimization, respectively. The fminimax method minimizes the worst-case of the two conflicting objective functions. The single-objective optimization revealed that the maximum PD ,   CD , and SRE were 2.04 W/m2, 11.08 A/m2, and 73.6%, respectively. The substrate concentration and flow rate significantly impacted the performance of the MFC. Pareto-optimal solutions were generated using the weighted sum method for maximizing the two conflicting objectives of PD and CD in addition to PD and SRE   simultaneously. The fminimax method for maximizing PD and CD showed that the compromise solution was to operate the MFC at maximum PD conditions. The model-based optimization proved to be a fast and low-cost optimization method for MFCs and it provided a better understanding of the factors affecting an MFC’s performance. The MOO provided Pareto-optimal solutions with multiple choices for practical applications depending on the purpose of using the MFCs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document