DISI DEFORMITY AND POST-OPERATIVE SYMPTOMS OF SCAPHOID NON-UNION

Hand Surgery ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 117-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Wada ◽  
M. Aoki ◽  
M. Usui ◽  
S. Ishii
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Average Duration ◽  
Bone Screw ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Corticocancellous Bone Grafting

The correlation between the residual dorsal intercalated segmental instability (DISI) deformity and symptoms of the wrist was investigated in 20 patients with healed scaphoid non-union who had open reduction and bone grafting. In seven patients, inlay corticocancellous bone grafting (modified Russe procedure) was performed. In four of the seven patients, an additional Herbert bone screw was used for internal fixation. The remaining 13 patients were treated with open reduction, anterior bone grafting, and internal fixation with Herbert bone screw. Average duration of follow-up period after operation was 20 months (range, 6 to 57 months). The average extension-flexion arc of the injured wrists was 129°, which was 31° less than that of the uninjured wrists. The average grip strength of the injured wrists was 89% of that of the uninjured wrist. Before the operation, all 20 patients were symptomatic and complained of wrist pains. Post-operatively, three patients experienced mild pains and only one complained of moderate wrist pains. Post-operative radiolunate angle ranged from 0° to 34° (average 10°). DISI deformity remained uncorrected in eight patients. Post-operative symptoms were compared amongst the eight patients who had DISI deformity and 12 patients who had no deformity. There was no significant difference in range of motion, grip strength, and incidence of pain between these two groups of patients. The presence of DISI deformity after bone grafting for a symptomatic scaphoid non-union was not predictive of post-operative symptoms of the wrist.

scholarly journals Functional and radiological assessment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated through open reduction and internal fixation surgery using pre-contoured locking compression plates

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 2261
Author(s):  
Rohil Singh Kakkar ◽  
Deepak Mehta ◽  
Ankit Sisodia
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Radiological Assessment ◽  
Fracture Union ◽  
Contact Loading ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Locking Compression Plates ◽  
Clavicle Fractures

Background: Fractures of the clavicle constitute approximately 2.6% of all the fractures and nearly 44-66% of fractures around shoulder.Methods: This particular study is intended to assess the functional and radiological outcomes in a series of 32 patients with closed displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated through open reduction and internal fixation surgery using pre-contoured clavicle locking compression plates.Results: All 32 patients achieved fracture union within 6 months follow up period. As per Constant-Murley scoring, 56.25% cases had excellent results, 34.37% cases had good, 6.25% cases had fair and 3.12% of the cases had poor results respectively.Conclusions: Open reduction and internal fixation surgery with pre-contoured locking compression plates in the displaced midshaft clavicle fractures restores the anatomy, biomechanics and contact loading characteristics of the clavicle and significantly reduces the incidence of non-union with improved functional outcomes resulting in better patient satisfaction.

Palmar Dislocation of the Trans-Scaphoid-Lunate Unit

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. EKEROT
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Wrist Function

A rare case of total palmar trans-scaphoid-lunate dislocation is reported. Open reduction, bone grafting and internal fixation were followed by uneventful healing. At follow-up 70 months after injury there is no osteonecrosis and the wrist function is almost normal.

scholarly journals Retrospective study about the postoperative stability of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seoghwan Yang ◽  
Jin-yong Cho ◽  
Woo-chul Shim ◽  
Sungbeom Kim
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Complex Fracture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Zygomaticomaxillary Complex

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative stability of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures according to the number of fixation sites and to investigate the direction of postoperative displacement of the unfixed part of the fractured segment. Methods This study was retrospectively performed on 38 patients who were treated by open reduction and internal fixation of ZMC fractures and were taken postoperative computed tomography (CT) between February 2012 and July 2019. The patients were classified into 3 groups: 1-point fixation, 2-point fixation, 3-point fixation according to the number of fixations. The postoperative displacement of the fractured segment was evaluated by the superimposition between postoperative CT and follow-up CT, and the postoperative stability according to the fixation sites was investigated through the amount of postoperative displacement. In addition, it was investigated in which direction the location of the fractured segment was changed in the unfixed fractured segment according to the fixation sites. Results The amount of postoperative displacement of the fractured segment was 0.75 ± 1.18 mm on average. In the postoperative displacement of the distal area according to the number of fixation of the fracture, there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of displacement of the fracture (p = 0.574). As for the direction of the change in the location of the fractured segment, 12 patients among 38 patients with the change in the location of the fractured segment were investigated, and the displacement in the medial direction (n = 11, 91.67%) was the most common in all three fixation methods. Conclusion In patients with a ZMC fracture who were treated by open reduction and internal fixation, the number of fixations did not make the difference in the postoperative displacement of the fracture. In addition, the fractured segment mainly changes in the medial direction after surgery, and this fact can be used as a reference for the reduction direction during surgery for the stable prognosis.

A Comparison of Complications and Reoperations Between Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Primary Arthrodesis Following Lisfranc Injury

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002110582
Author(s):  
Eric So ◽  
Jonathan Lee ◽  
Michelle L. Pershing ◽  
Anson K. Chu ◽  
Matthew Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Lisfranc Injury ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lisfranc Injuries ◽  
Reoperation Rates

There is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding optimal treatment methods for Lisfranc injuries, and recent literature has emphasized the need to compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with primary arthrodesis (PA). The purpose of the current study is to compare reoperation and complication rates between ORIF and PA following Lisfranc injury in a private, outpatient, orthopaedic practice. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing operative intervention for Lisfranc injury between January 2009 and September 2015. A total of 196 patients met the inclusion criteria (130 ORIF, 66 PA), with a mean follow-up of 61.3 and 81.7 weeks, respectively. The ORIF group had a higher reoperation rate than the PA group, due to hardware removal. When hardware removals were excluded, the reoperation rate was similar. Postsurgical complications were compared between the 2 groups with no significant difference. In conclusion, ORIF and PA had similar complication rates. When hardware removals were excluded, the reoperation rates were similar, although hardware removals were more common in the ORIF group compared with the PA group. Levels of Evidence: Level III

scholarly journals Distal humerus fracture in patients over 70 years of age: results of open reduction and internal fixation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Moursy ◽  
Kilian Wegmann ◽  
Florian Wichlas ◽  
Mark Tauber
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Distal Humerus ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Scores ◽  
Distal Humerus Fractures

Abstract Background Due to the complexity of distal humerusfractures and often poor bone quality in elderly patients, these entities remain a challenge. However, because of a high rate of complications related to total elbow prostheses, reconstruction of distal humerus fractures should still be considered a therapeutic option, also in the elderly patient. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation and to evaluate whether the results justify reconstruction even in elderly patients. We hypothesized that despite advanced age, reasonable clinical results can be achieved, using a standardized surgical technique and aftertreatment protocol for the treatment of distal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Methods Between 2004 and 2012, 30 patients with a mean age of 78 years at the time of injury with a recent distal humerus fracture were evaluated. All patients underwent the identical aftertreatment protocol with no weight bearing for 6 weeks and weekly increasing range of motion. Follow-up rate was 90%. 22 patients were treated with double plate, 4 with single plate, and 1 with screw fixation only. Patients were evaluated based on clinical criteria. Primary outcome measures were Mayo Elbow Performance Score, VAS and joint range of motion, secondary was radiological evaluation. Results After a mean follow-up period of 3.8 years (min. 1 year, max. 9 years, SD ± 2), the average range of motion was flexion of 127° (min. 100°; max. 150°; SD ± 16.5) and average loss of extension of 20.9° (min. 5°; max. 40°; SD ± 11). Average pronation and supination was 68.3° (min. 0°; max. 90°; SD ± 25.3) and 75.3° (min. 0°; max. 90°; SD ± 19.7), respectively. Average Mayo Elbow Performance (MEPS) score was 88.7 (min. 60; max. 100; SD ± 12.1). 6 patients developed heterotopic ossification without significant effect on the clinical outcome. 7 patients had radiological evidence of at least partial non-union with one requiring revision, 2 discrete hardware dislocations were treated conservatively. There were no infections in the presented cohort. Our results regarding the surgical approach showed significantly higher patient satisfaction scores in the osteotomy group, compared to the group with Triceps-On Approach (PTOA). Conclusion The present data support indication for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) even in the elderly patient. Advanced age should not be seen as a contraindication for ORIF of fractures of the distal humerus. Although the rate of complications is higher than in younger patients, complications such as non-union are often asymptomatic, patient satisfaction scores are high, and the possible devastating complications of failed elbow replacement can be evaded. Level of evidence IV.

scholarly journals Timing of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Direk Tantigate ◽  
J. Turner Vosseller ◽  
Justin Greisberg ◽  
Benjamin Ascherman ◽  
Christina Freibott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Unstable ankle fractures are typically treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for stabilization in an effort to ultimately prevent post-traumatic arthritis. It is not uncommon for operative treatment to be performed as an outpatient in the ambulatory surgery setting several days to a couple weeks after the injury to facilitate things from a scheduling perspective. It is unclear what effect this delay has on functional outcome. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of delayed operative treatment by comparing the functional outcomes for groups of patients based on the amount of time between the injury and surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 122 ankle fracture patients who were surgically treated by ORIF over a three year period was performed. All ankle fracture patients older than 18 years with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included. A total of 61 patients were included for this study. Three patients were excluded; 2 patients had an open injury and 1 patient presented with a delayed union. Demographic data, comorbidities, injury characteristics, duration from injury to surgery, operative time, length of postoperative stay, complications and functional outcomes were recorded. Functional outcome was determined by Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) at the latest follow-up visit. Comparison of demographic variables and the subcategory of FAOS including symptoms, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sport activity and quality of life (QOL) was performed between patient underwent ORIF less than 14 days after injury and 14 days or greater. Results: A total of 58 patients were included in this study. Thirty-six patients (62.1%) were female. The mean age of patients was 48.14 ± 16.84 years (19-84 years). The mean follow-up time was 41.48 ± 12.25 months (24-76 months). The duration between injury and operative fixation in the two groups was 7 ± 3 days (<14 days) and 18 ± 3 days (>14 days), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic variables, comorbidities, injury characteristics, or length of operation. Each subcategory of FAOS demonstrated no statistically significant difference between these two groups. (Table 1) Additionally, further analysis for the delayed fixation more than 7 days and 10 days also revealed no significant difference of FAOS. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture more than 14 days does not significantly diminish functional outcome according to FAOS. Delay of ORIF for ankle fractures does not play a significant role in the long-term functional outcome.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation and Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis for Sanders Type IV Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0004
Author(s):  
Seunghun Woo ◽  
Hyung Jin Chung ◽  
Su-Young Bae ◽  
Tae Sik Goh
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
Subtalar Arthrodesis ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: To compare clinical outcome of Sanders type IV intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis (PSTA). Methods: Between March 2003 and November 2013, 22 patients with 22 Sanders type IV intra-articular calcaneal fractures were included in this study. Of these, 11 feet were treated with ORIF (ORIF group), 11 feet were treated with ORIF and PSTA (PSTA group). The mean follow-up periods was 34.6 months (range, 18-72 months). Clinical outcomes were assessed along with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society’s Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS score), the Visual Analog Scale Pain score (VAS score) at 6-, 12 month, and last follow-up. The patient satisfaction, returning to previous occupation and postoperative complications were also investigated. Results: Complete bone union were achieved in all patients. No statistical difference was found between the results for ORIF compared with PSTA: the mean preoperative Bohler angle were, respectively, -3.2±9.2 and -6.6±12.7 degrees (p=0.475); the mean last follow-up AOFAS scores were 73.8±14.9 and 80.5±4.6 (p=0.795); the mean VAS last follow-up VAS scores were 29.7±20.6 and 23.4±10.0 (p=0.986). Secondary subtalar arthrodesis were conducted in 5 patients (45.5%) of ORIF group due to subtalar osteoarthritis symptom within 2 years, postoperatively. Conclusion: We were unable to demonstrate a significant difference of clinical outcomes between ORIF and PSTA however, the patient satisfaction was higher in the PSTA group. PSTA may be considerable choice for patients who need fast recovery to daily activity and to prevent the need for secondary subtalar arthrodesis.

Timing of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Direk Tantigate ◽  
Gavin Ho ◽  
Joshua Kirschenbaum ◽  
Henrik Bäcker ◽  
Benjamin Asherman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Posttraumatic Arthritis ◽  
Injury Characteristics ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Unstable ankle fractures are treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to prevent posttraumatic arthritis. Typically, ORIF is performed as an ambulatory surgery several days to a few weeks after injury. It is unclear what effect this delay may have on functional outcome. This study aimed to assess the effect of timing of ankle ORIF on wound complications and functional outcome. Methods. A retrospective review of 121 patients who underwent ankle ORIF was performed. A total of 58 patients had a follow-up of at least 24 months. Time between injury and surgery greater than 14 days was defined as “delayed.” Demographic variables, injury characteristics, length of surgery, and postoperative stay were documented. Comparison of demographic variables, wound complications, and functional outcome determined by Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) was performed. Results. 118 patients were included. The duration between injury and surgery was 6 days in the “early” group and 19 days in the “delayed” group. There were no significant differences in demographic variables, injury characteristics, and length of surgery between the groups. Wound complications in the early and delayed groups were 5% and 11.8%, although this difference was not statistically significant. Among 58 patients who had a follow-up of at least 24 months, the median follow-up time was 38 (range, 24-76) months. Each subscale of FAOS demonstrated no significant difference. Conclusion. Ankle ORIF more than 14 days after injury did not significantly increase the rate of wound complication, nor did it impair ultimate functional outcome in this group. Levels of Evidence: Level III

Clinical Outcomes and Complications after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Utilizing Conventional Plates in 65 Distal Radial and Ulnar Fractures of Miniature- and Toy-Breed Dogs

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 214-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Miyazaki ◽  
Taichi Shimatsu ◽  
Kyoko Iizuka ◽  
Masaaki Nishimura ◽  
Takeshi Aikawa
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Normal Functional

Objective This article aims to evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of distal radial and ulnar fractures in miniature- and toy-breed dogs treated with conventional bone plate fixation. Methods Medical records (2001–2010) of miniature- and toy-breed dogs with distal radial and ulnar fractures repaired with open reduction and internal fixation utilizing conventional plates were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were body weight of <7 kg, fracture located in the distal antebrachium (distal-to-total radial length ratio < 0.4) and follow-up radiographs available. Results All 65 fractures healed without developing non-union, and had a successful return to normal function (median follow-up: 73 months; range: 2–149 months). Minor complication in seven fractures and major complication in four fractures were identified. Clinical Significance Open reduction and conventional plate fixation of distal radial and ulnar fractures in miniature- and toy-breed dogs are effective means of fixation that result in normal functional outcome without developing non-union.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document