Simple objects in equivariantized module categories

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950001
Author(s):  
Sara Pinter ◽  
Virgínia Rodrigues

Let [Formula: see text] be a finite group acting on a fusion category [Formula: see text] and let [Formula: see text] be a subgroup of [Formula: see text]. Let [Formula: see text] be a semisimple indecomposable module category over [Formula: see text]. Considering [Formula: see text] a simple object in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] the stabilizer (or inertia) subgroup of [Formula: see text], we establish a bijective correspondence between isomorphism classes of simple objects in equivariantizations [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], where such simple objects contain [Formula: see text] as a direct summand. Also, as an application to projective representations of [Formula: see text], we relate isomorphism classes of simple objects in [Formula: see text] with irreducible projective representations of [Formula: see text].

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Calixto ◽  
Adriano Moura ◽  
Alistair Savage

AbstractAn equivariant map queer Lie superalgebra is the Lie superalgebra of regular maps from an algebraic variety (or scheme) X to a queer Lie superalgebra q that are equivariant with respect to the action of a finite group Γ acting on X and q. In this paper, we classify all irreducible finite-dimensional representations of the equivariant map queer Lie superalgebras under the assumption that Γ is abelian and acts freely on X. We show that such representations are parameterized by a certain set of Γ-equivariant finitely supported maps from X to the set of isomorphism classes of irreducible finite-dimensional representations of q. In the special case where X is the torus, we obtain a classification of the irreducible finite-dimensional representations of the twisted loop queer superalgebra.


2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
FIRUZ KAMALOV

AbstractWe study the space of irreducible representations of a crossed product ${C}^{\ast } $-algebra ${\mathop{A\rtimes }\nolimits}_{\sigma } G$, where $G$ is a finite group. We construct a space $\widetilde {\Gamma } $ which consists of pairs of irreducible representations of $A$ and irreducible projective representations of subgroups of $G$. We show that there is a natural action of $G$ on $\widetilde {\Gamma } $ and that the orbit space $G\setminus \widetilde {\Gamma } $ corresponds bijectively to the dual of ${\mathop{A\rtimes }\nolimits}_{\sigma } G$.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 1250051 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. AKBARI ◽  
A. R. MOGHADDAMFAR

Let M be a finite group and D (M) be the degree pattern of M. Denote by h OD (M) the number of isomorphism classes of finite groups G with the same order and degree pattern as M. A finite group M is called k-fold OD-characterizable if h OD (M) = k. Usually, a 1-fold OD-characterizable group is simply called OD-characterizable. The purpose of this article is twofold. First, it provides some information on the structure of a group from its degree pattern. Second, it proves that the projective special linear groups L4(4), L4(8), L4(9), L4(11), L4(13), L4(16), L4(17) are OD-characterizable.


1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Opolka

Let G be a finite group (with neutral element e) which operates trivially on the multiplicative group R* of a commutative ring R (with identity 1). Let H2(G, R*) denote the second cohomology group of G with respect to the trivial G-module R*. With every represented by the central factor system we associate the so called twisted group algebra (R, G, f) (see [3, V, 23.7] for the definition). (R, G, f) is determined by f up to R-algebra isomorphism. In this note we shall describe its representations in the case R is an algebraically closed field C of characteristic zero and G is an extra-special p-group P.


2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Pacifici

We prove that, given a quasi-primitive complex representation D for a finite group G, the possible ways of decomposing D as an inner tensor product of two projective representations of G are parametrised in terms of the group structure of G. More explicitly, we construct a bijection between the set of such decompositions and a particular interval in the lattice of normal subgroups of G.


Author(s):  
P. N. Hoffmann ◽  
J. F. Humphreys

The projective representations of a finite group G over a field K are divided into sets, each parametrized by an element of the group H2(G, Kx). The latter is the Schur multiplier M(G) when K = ℂ.


1988 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Higgs

Let Gbe a finite group, and P:G → GL(n, ) be such that for all x, y ∈ G(i) P(x)P(y) = α(x, y)P(xy), and(ii)P(l) = In,where α(x, y) ∈ *; then P is a projective representation of G with cocycle α and degree n. For other basic definitions concerning projective representations see [4].


1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-74
Author(s):  
S. B. Conlon ◽  
W. D. Wallis

Let G be a finite group and F a complete local noetherian commutative ring with residue field of characteristic p # 0. Let A(G) denote the representation algebra of G with respect to F. This is a linear algebra over the complex field whose basis elements are the isomorphism-classes of indecomposable finitely generated FG-representation modules, with addition and multiplication induced by direct sum and tensor product respectively. The two authors have separately found decompositions of A(G) as direct sums of subalgebras. In this note we show that the decompositions in one case have a common refinement given in the other's paper.


Author(s):  
N. Spaltenstein

The notations and the references are the same as in the article by Alvis and Lusztig (0).For a finite group H let H^ be the set of isomorphism classes of irreducible complex representations of H. Let |θ| denote the degree of θ∈H^


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document