CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA MEASUREMENT OF SOFT TISSUES IN VITRO: A NON-CONTACT LASER SCAN METHOD

2008 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 353-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
MEI JUN JOLENE LIU ◽  
SIAW MENG CHOU ◽  
KHENG LIM GOH ◽  
SOON HUAT TAN
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Conventional Approach ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Average Thickness ◽  
Laser Technique ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
In Vitro Techniques ◽  
Measuring Machine

Measurements of cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of soft tissues such as tendons and ligaments allow for the evaluation of the biomechanical properties of the tissue. Underlying in vitro techniques are data reduction approaches for determining the average thickness of the tissue and the assumption of the geometry of the cross-section, i.e. circular or elliptical. However, tissue distortions, sagging, and concavities could affect the reliability of these techniques, since these features may not be accounted for adequately. To address some of the concerns faced by these techniques, a non-contact (non-destructive) laser scan technique has been developed. In this technique, a laser scans along the axis of the tissue, a coordinate measuring machine simultaneously locates the corresponding point on the tissue based on the detection of reflected (attenuated) intensity, and, finally, computerized image analysis reconstructs the morphology of the tissue. This technique was applied to patellar tendons (PTs) from New Zealand rabbits. The scanning time for each PT was less than 2 minutes. Reconstructed three-dimensional surface plots revealed microconcavities consistent with images seen under optical microscopy. CSAs of these PTs were determined for repeatability and precision; results from a conventional approach which estimated the corresponding CSAs based on the average thickness and the assumption of ellipsoidal cross-sectional geometry were also determined for the purpose of comparison. Based on the standard cuboid model, the error between the laser technique and the conventional approach was within 0.4%; the reproducibility of the laser technique was within 2%.

A method of in-vitro measurement of the cross-sectional area of soft tissues, using ultrasonography

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Noguchi ◽  
Toshiya Kitaura ◽  
Kazuya Ikoma ◽  
Yoshiaki Kusaka
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Cross

scholarly journals A Measurement Method of Microsphere with Dual Scanning Probes

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang ◽  
Huang ◽  
Xu ◽  
Cheng ◽  
Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Method ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Quartz Tuning Fork ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Scanning Probes ◽  
Repeatability Error ◽  
Measurement Results ◽  
Size Standard ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
Tungsten Tip

The probe tip of a micro-coordinate Measuring Machine (micro-CMM) is a microsphere with a diameter of hundreds of microns, and its sphericity is generally controlled within tens to hundreds of nanometers. However, the accurate measurement of the microsphere morphology is difficult because of the small size and high precision requirement. In this study, a measurement method with two scanning probes is proposed to obtain dimensions including the diameter and sphericity of microsphere. A series of maximum cross-sectional profiles of the microsphere in different angular directions are scanned simultaneously and differently by the scanning probes. By integrating the data of these maximum profiles, the dimensions of the microsphere can be calculated. The scanning probe is fabricated by combining a quartz tuning fork and a tungsten tip, which have a fine vertical resolution at a sub-nano scale. A commercial ruby microsphere is measured with the proposed method. Experiments that involve the scanning of six section profiles are carried out to estimate the dimensions of the ruby microsphere. The repeatability error of one section profile is 15.1 nm, which indicates that the measurement system has favorable repeatability. The mainly errors in the measurement are eliminated. The measured diameter and roundness are all consistent with the size standard of the commercial microsphere. The measurement uncertainty is evaluated, and the measurement results show that the method can be used to measure the dimensions of microspheres effectively.

scholarly journals Trueness and Precision of Three-Dimensional Digitizing Intraoral Devices

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussam Mutwalli ◽  
Michael Braian ◽  
Deyar Mahmood ◽  
Christel Larsson
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Distance Measurements ◽  
True Value ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Intraoral Devices

Aim. To measure the trueness and precision under repeatable conditions for different intraoral scanners (IOSs) when scanning fully edentulous arch with multiple implants. Materials and Methods. Three IOSs and one industrial scanner were used to scan one edentulous master cast containing five implant scan bodies and three spheres. The cast was scanned thirty times with each scanner device. All scans were analyzed in the inspect software, and three-dimensional locations of the implants and the interarch distance between the spheres were measured. The values were compared to measurements made with one coordinate measuring machine (true value). One-way ANOVA was used to calculate the differences between IOSs and in comparison with the true value. Results. Significant differences were found between all IOSs. For the implant measurements, Trios 3 had the lowest trueness (≤114 μm), followed by Trios 3 mono (≤63 μm) and Itero element (≤−41 μm). Trios had the lowest precision (≤135 μm), followed by Itero element (≤101 μm) and Trios 3 mono (≤100 μm). With regard to the interarch distance measurements, Trios 3 had the lowest trueness (≤68 μm), followed by Trios 3 mono (≤45 μm) and Itero element (≤40 μm). Trios 3 had the lowest precision (≤206 μm), followed by Itero element (≤124 μm) and Trios 3 mono (≤111 μm). Conclusion. The results from this in vitro study suggest that precision is low for the tested IOS devices when scanning fully edentulous arches with multiple implants.

scholarly journals Linear Accuracy of Full-Arch Digital Models Using Four Different Scanning Methods: An In Vitro Study Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Hyun Kim ◽  
Sang-Sun Han ◽  
Yoon Joo Choi ◽  
Chang-Woo Woo
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Accuracy Evaluation ◽  
Arch Model ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Scanning Method ◽  
True Model ◽  
Measuring Machine

Improving the accuracy of the digital model is essential for the digitalization of the dental field. This study introduced a novel method of objective accuracy evaluation of digitized full dental arch model using coordinate measuring machine (CMM). To obtain a true linear measurement value using the CMM, 17 reference balls were attached to the typodont, and 12 measurements between balls on the X-(width), Y-(length), and Z-axes (height) were performed automatically. A rubber impression and a plaster cast replica of the typodont with balls were fabricated, and they were digitized with following methods: (a) true model intraoral scans; (b) impression cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans; (c) cast CBCT scans; and (d) cast extraoral scans. Each scanning method was performed 20 times. Twelve linear measurements on the digitized models were automatically made using software. The one-sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used for measurement accuracy analysis. The cast extraoral scan was most accurate on X- and Y-axes, while impression CBCT was the most accurate on Z-axis. Over all axes, the intraoral scan resulted in the most deviation from the true model, and the reproducibility of each scan was also low. Extraoral scan shows high precision on width and length, and impression CBCT is advantageous for dental work where height factor is of importance.

Dimensional Accuracy of Optical Bite Registration in Single and Multiple Unit Restorations

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Iwaki ◽  
N Wakabayashi ◽  
Y Igarashi
Keyword(s):  
Optical Method ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Physical Method ◽  
Registration Data ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Rotational Deviation

SUMMARY The dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in the CEREC system was compared to that of the conventional physical method in vitro using a bite registration material. Maxillary and mandibular full-arch dentate epoxy models mounted on an articulator were used to measure the interarch distance and the angles created by the occlusal planes. The preparations for a single restoration on the maxillary first molar or for multiple restorations on the maxillary posterior quadrant were made on the model. Optical impression and bite registration data were collected to construct virtual models using computer-aided design software. A silicone material was used for the physical method, and the dimensional accuracy was measured by means of the coordinate measuring machine. The discrepancy relative to the baseline before preparation was analyzed in each registration record. For the single restoration, the optical method created a mean discrepancy of 243.2 μm relative to baseline at the prepared tooth, which was insignificantly but slightly lower than the mean discrepancy of 311.1 μm obtained with the physical method. The mean rotational deviation in the horizontal plane was significantly lower for the optical method. For the multiple preparations, the optical method showed significantly larger discrepancy on the right molar and on the left premolar and molar sites. In the frontal view, the optical method created significantly larger rotational deviation than the physical method. The result indicates that the optical bite registration was effective in terms of dimensional accuracy for single posterior restorations.

Non-Contact Area Measurement Techniques for Cross Sectional Properties of Soft Tissues

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipan Bose ◽  
Jason R. Kerrigan ◽  
Johan Ivarsson ◽  
N. Jane Madeley ◽  
Steve A. Millington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Knee Ligaments ◽  
Human Knee ◽  
Sectional Shape

In this study, a non-contact optical three-dimensional digitization technique is described to account for area measurement problems related to soft tissue. The technique is used to generate digitized models of human knee ligaments (collateral and cruciate ligament bundles). Cross-sectional area of knee ligaments is determined by applying Green’s theorem on data obtained from the digitized models. The surface concavity features of different ligaments shown in this study signify the extent of approximation done by projection based methods. The study also reports the variation in cross-sectional shape of a ligament along its long axis, indicating the importance of deciding the appropriate cross section for stress calculation measurements.

Quantifying Ligament Cross-Sectional Area via Molding and Casting

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly H. Schmidt ◽  
William R. Ledoux
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Tissue Destruction ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Ankle Ligaments ◽  
The Cross

Ligament cross-sectional areas are difficult to determine because ligaments are soft tissues, can be very short, and may be deep between bones. However, accurate measurements are required for determining the material properties from mechanical testing. Many techniques have been tried, but most suffer from one or more of the following: tissue deformation, tissue destruction, submersion of the tissue in saline, the need for a clear line of site, the inability to detect concavities, or poorly defined cross-sectional perimeters. Molding techniques have been used but have been limited by material issues such as large shrinkages, the inability to capture small detail, or the need to destroy the mold to remove the ligament. In this study, we developed a suitable molding and casting technique without systematic shrinkage that could accurately capture the odd shapes and concavities of foot and ankle ligaments with small clearances between bones. Metal rods of 1.62 mm, 2.90 mm, 3.18 mm, and 9.43 mm in diameter were molded using a liquid silicone rubber and cast with polyurethane. The effect of cutting the mold for specimen removal was investigated, and similar tests were done in the presence of saline. Image analysis software was used to determine the cross-sectional areas from photographs of cut castings. In addition, four different ligaments (each n=5) were dissected, molded, and cast. The cross-sectional area of each ligament was obtained. The maximum difference in area for all cases was 2.00%, with the majority being less than 1.00%; the overall root mean square error was 0.334 mm2 or 0.97%. Neither cutting the mold for specimen removal nor the presence of saline affected the cross-sectional area of the castings. Various representative foot and ankle ligaments were also molded and cast to capture fine detail of the ligament midsubstance including concavities. We have developed a method of measuring ligament cross-sectional area that can overcome the limitations of other area measurement techniques, while accounting for the complicated anatomy of the bones of the foot. The method was validated using metal rods of known diameters, and a representative set foot ligaments (N=20) was analyzed.

scholarly journals In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonam Gupta ◽  
Aparna Ichalangod Narayan ◽  
Dhanasekar Balakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
The Difference

Purpose. For a precise fit of multiple implant framework, having an accurate definitive cast is imperative. The present study evaluated dimensional accuracy of master casts obtained using different impression trays and materials with open tray impression technique.Materials and Methods. A machined aluminum reference model with four parallel implant analogues was fabricated. Forty implant level impressions were made. Eight groups (n=5) were tested using impression materials (polyether and vinylsiloxanether) and four types of impression trays, two being custom (self-cure acrylic and light cure acrylic) and two being stock (plastic and metal). The interimplant distances were measured on master casts using a coordinate measuring machine. The collected data was compared with a standard reference model and was statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA.Results. Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found between the two impression materials. However, the difference seen was small (36 μm) irrespective of the tray type used. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between varied stock and custom trays.Conclusions. The polyether impression material proved to be more accurate than vinylsiloxanether impression material. The rigid nonperforated stock trays, both plastic and metal, could be an alternative for custom trays for multi-implant impressions when used with medium viscosity impression materials.

Trueness and Precision of Three Different Scanners for Digitizing a Completely Edentulous Gypsum Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Ammar Kayssoun ◽  
A. Nehir Özden
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Intraoral Scanner ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Way Anova

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the precision and trueness of three different scanners to scan a maxillary edentulous model using three-dimensional evaluation software. Materials and Methods: A coordinate measuring machine was used as the reference scanner. Cone beam computed tomography, computed tomography (CT), and an intraoral scanner were used to digitize an edentulous gypsum model. Data were collected and loaded into three-dimensional evaluation software. The scan outputs were superimposed, and the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the scanners were compared. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the accuracy values among all groups (trueness) and to determine differences within groups (precision). Statistical significance was assessed with an independent sample t-test (= 0.05) for each group. Results: The mean precision values ranged from 3.5 to –0.2 m. Analysis of the superimposed scans onto the reference scan for each group revealed no significant differences in trueness and precision (p > 0.05) among all groups. Further, binary comparisons of the datasets of each group revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in terms of precision values, except in the CT group wherein significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were observed for most models. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in terms of accuracy (precision and trueness) among the three scanners. All scanners were effective in scanning the edentulous gypsum model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document