scholarly journals In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonam Gupta ◽  
Aparna Ichalangod Narayan ◽  
Dhanasekar Balakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
The Difference

Purpose. For a precise fit of multiple implant framework, having an accurate definitive cast is imperative. The present study evaluated dimensional accuracy of master casts obtained using different impression trays and materials with open tray impression technique.Materials and Methods. A machined aluminum reference model with four parallel implant analogues was fabricated. Forty implant level impressions were made. Eight groups (n=5) were tested using impression materials (polyether and vinylsiloxanether) and four types of impression trays, two being custom (self-cure acrylic and light cure acrylic) and two being stock (plastic and metal). The interimplant distances were measured on master casts using a coordinate measuring machine. The collected data was compared with a standard reference model and was statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA.Results. Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found between the two impression materials. However, the difference seen was small (36 μm) irrespective of the tray type used. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between varied stock and custom trays.Conclusions. The polyether impression material proved to be more accurate than vinylsiloxanether impression material. The rigid nonperforated stock trays, both plastic and metal, could be an alternative for custom trays for multi-implant impressions when used with medium viscosity impression materials.

Evaluation of Accuracy of Casts of Multiple Internal Connection Implant Prosthesis Obtained From Different Impression Materials and Techniques: An In Vitro Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malesh Pujari ◽  
Pooja Garg ◽  
D. R. Prithviraj
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Internal Connection ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multiple Comparison Procedures

Movement of impression copings inside the impression material using a direct (open tray) impression technique during clinical and laboratory phases may cause inaccuracy in transferring the 3-dimensional spatial orientation of implants intraorally to the cast. Consequently, the prosthesis may require corrective procedures. This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy of 3 different impression techniques using polyether and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression material to obtain a precise cast for multiple internal connection implants. A reference acrylic resin model with 4 internal connection implants was fabricated. Impressions of the reference model were made using 3 different techniques and 2 different impression materials. The study consisted of 24 specimens divided into 6 groups of 4 each. Impressions were poured with ADA type IV stone (Kalrock, Kalabhai Karson Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India). All casts were evaluated for the positional accuracy (mm) of the implant replica heads using a profile projector. These measurements were compared to the measurements calculated on the reference resin model, which served as a control. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison procedures to evaluate group means. The results revealed significant difference for anterior implant distance between the 2 impression materials (P &lt; .01) and also among the 3 different techniques (P &lt; .05). The lowest mean variation was found with the polyether impression material and the splinted technique. For posterior implants, the results suggested no significant difference between the 2 impression materials (P ≥ .05). Although results were not statistically significant, the polyether impression material showed the lowest mean variation as compared to the VPS impression material. However, there was a significant difference among the 3 different techniques (P &lt; .05). Among the 3 different techniques, the lowest mean variation between 2 posterior implants was found in the splinted technique. Casts obtained from impression techniques using square impression copings splinted together with autopolymerizing acrylic resin prior to the impression procedure were more accurate than casts obtained from impressions with nonmodified implant impression copings and with airborne particle–abraded, adhesive-coated copings. Casts obtained from polyether impression material were more accurate than casts obtained from vinyl polysiloxane impression material.

scholarly journals A comparative evaluation of three dimensional accuracy of different types of interocclusal recording materials - an in vitro study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Dwivedi ◽  
Kavita Maru ◽  
Aakash Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Measuring Machine

Introduction. The interocclusal registration materials record the occlusal relationship between the natural and /or artificial teeth for planning an occlusal rehabilitation in removable and fixed partial dentures. Aim and objectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy and the three dimensional stability offered by three different types of interocclusal recording materials at storage time intervals of 1 hour and 24 hours. Methods. Three commercially available interocclusal recording materials were used - Group I - Polyether bite registration paste (Ramitec), Group II- Polyvinylsiloxane bite registration material (Imprint), Group III- Bite registration wax (Maarc).The test was carried out using an epoxy resin model. A total of 30 samples were made with each group consisting of ten samples. Three dimensional measurements were carried out by using 3D-Coordinate measuring machine (CMM) at time intervals of 0-1 hour and 0-24 hours in X, Y and Z- axis.   Results. Twelve readings were obtained for three axes (4 readings for each sample at 1 axis) and the averages of these four values were noted for a particular axis (X/Y/Z). Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparison among the groups and then Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) tests was performed for comparison among groups at the 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion. Polyvinylsiloxane was dimensionally the most stable material followed by polyether and finally bite registration wax. Dimensional accuracy and stability is influenced by both “material” and “time” factors.

scholarly journals Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of dental bridges manufactured with conventional casting technique and CAD/CAM system with Ceramill Sintron blocks using CMM

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Izadi ◽  
Fariborz Vafaee ◽  
Arash Shishehian ◽  
Ghodratollah Roshanaei ◽  
Behzad Fathi Afkari
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Casting Technique ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Conventional Casting ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Milling Method ◽  
Measuring Machine

Background. Recently, non-presintered chromium-cobalt (Cr-Co) blocks with the commercial name of Ceramill Sintron were introduced to the market. However, comprehensive studies on the dimensional accuracy and fit of multi-unit frameworks made of these blocks using the coordinate measuring machine (CMM) are lacking. This study aimed to assess and compare the dimensional changes and fit of conventional casting and milled frameworks using Ceramill Sintron. Methods. A metal model was designed and scanned and 5-unit frameworks were fabricated using two techniques: (I) the conventional casting method (n=20): the wax model was designed, milled in the CAD/CAM machine, flasked and invested; (II) the milling method using Ceramill Sintron blocks (n=20): the wax patterns of group 1 were used; Ceramill Sintron blocks were milled and sintered. Measurements were made on the original reference model and the fabricated frameworks using the CMM in all the three spatial dimensions, and dimensional changes were recorded in a checklist. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and the two groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). Results. The fabricated frameworks in both groups showed significant dimensional changes in all the three dimensions. Comparison of dimensional changes between the two groups revealed no significant differences (P>0.05) except for transverse changes (arch) that were significantly greater in Ceramill Sintron frameworks (P<0.05). Conclusion. The two manufacturing processes were the same regarding dimensional changes and the magnitude of marginal gaps and both processes resulted in significant dimensional changes in frameworks. Ceramill Sintron frameworks showed significantly greater transverse changes than the conventional frameworks.

scholarly journals Evaluation and Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Newly Introduced Elastomeric Impression Material using 3D Laser Scanners: An in vitro Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen S Yadav ◽  
Teerthesh Jain ◽  
Amrita Pandita ◽  
SMA Feroz ◽  
Pradeep LNU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Laser Scanner ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Laser Scanners ◽  
Master Model

ABSTRACT Aim Aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate dimensional accuracy of newely introduced elastomeric impression material after repeated pours at different time intervals. Materials and methods In the present study a total of 20 (10 + 10) impressions of master model were made from vinyl polyether silicone and vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Each impression was repeatedly poured at 1, 24 hours and 14 days. Therefore, a total of 60 casts were obtained. Casts obtained were scanned with three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner and measurements were done. Results Vinyl polyether silicone produced overall undersized dies, with greatest change being 0.14% only after 14 days. Vinyl polysiloxane produced smaller dies after 1 and 24 hours and larger dies after 14 days, differing from master model by only 0.07% for the smallest die and to 0.02% for the largest die. Conclusion All the deviations measured from the master model with both the impression materials were within a clinically acceptable range. Clinical significance In a typical fixed prosthodontic treatment accuracy of prosthesis is critical as it determines the success, failure and the prognosis of treatment including abutments. This is mainly dependent upon fit of prosthesis which in turn is dependent on dimensional accuracy of dies, poured from elastomeric impressions. How to cite this article Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz SMA, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Newly Introduced Elastomeric Impression Material using 3D Laser Scanners: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):265-268.

scholarly journals Comparative Time-Dependent Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy of Dies Using Different Tray Adhesives: An In Vitro Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Ramandeep Kaur ◽  
Manjit Kumar ◽  
Shailesh Jain ◽  
Neha Jindal
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Crosshead Speed ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Separation Failure

Abstract Statement of Problem The adhesion of impression material to impression tray is very important. Tray adhesive plays a major role in making accurate impression. Although manufactures recommend the use of particular tray adhesives, comparison of their affective adhesiveness has not been reported. The effect of use of tray adhesives on dimensional accuracy of dies has not been established. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the dimensional accuracy of dies using different tray adhesives at different time intervals. Materials and Methods First part of study comprised 120 samples in six groups with 20 samples in each group. First group comprised samples with no tray adhesive, and in other five groups, different types of tray adhesives were applied. The dies obtained were evaluated for upper diameter, lower diameter, and occlusogingival height. In the second part, there were a total of 125 samples in five groups with 25 samples in each group. Five different types of tray adhesive were applied for five different time intervals 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 minutes, respectively. The specimens were tested in tensile mode for its debonding force at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min, until separation failure occurred. Results Significant difference was seen for upper and lower diameters when compared with the group without any tray adhesive. The maximum bond strength was found in the group in which tray adhesive was applied for 20 minutes.

scholarly journals A Comparative study of Different Impression Materials and Techniques of Dental Implant at The Second Stage of Procedure

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Hussameldien Hussien ◽  
◽  
Natashekara Mallesh ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference

Background of the study: Dental implants are one of the most sought-after choice of treatment for restoration and rehabilitation of missing teeth. However, the accuracy of the removable or fixed superstructures over the dental implants is influenced for a major proportion by the impression techniques and materials. This paper discusses the comparison of the accuracy of different impression materials and techniques used in the second stage of the dental implant treatment in vivo. Objective: The objective of the paper is to study the comparison of the accuracy of different impression materials and techniques used in the second stage of the dental implant’s treatment in vivo. Search methodology: Electronically key searched in scientific literature databases. Selection criteria: Based on the set inclusion and exclusion criteria such as studies conducted in partial edentulous arches, in the age group of 30 to 55 years. Data collection and analysis: A total of 248 literatures were found to be relevant to the framed topic and were scrutinised based on the dejected criteria and 18 kinds of literature obtained were taken into consideration. Main Result: Among the different impression materials taken into the comparative study, it was observed that polyvinyl siloxane exhibited a dimensional accuracy slightly greater than polyether. However, light body putty exhibited greater accuracy than medium body putty. Various impression techniques were compared to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of the impression. It was observed that the open tray technique and splinted impression technique produced a more dimensionally stable impression than the other techniques. Authors Conclusion: this study to assess the accuracy of various impression material and methods has concluded that while impression techniques influence the accuracy of the impression, the impression materials namely the Polyvinyl siloxane and polyether exhibit no significant difference with a slight preference to the polyvinyl siloxane. Hence the choice of impression material is at the discretion of the dentist performing the treatment and also this area requires further studies to establish conclusive evidence.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on Accuracy and Reproducibility of Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone as an Impression Materials.

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Shakila Fatema ◽  
Sheikh Md Shahriar Quader ◽  
Mohammad Shamsuzzaman ◽  
Mirza Md Arifur Rahman ◽  
Nasima Khan
Keyword(s):  
Addition Reaction ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Horizontal Line ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Surface Detail

Background: To achieve accuracy and exact reproduction of prosthesis, choosing a perfect impression material is essential. Especially to make the prosthesis as accurately as possible, impression material should possess some essential properties, like; minimum dimensional changes, good flow ability and easy removal. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and surface detail reproduction of Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone as an impression materials. Method: This is an experimental in vitro study. In this study Impression by Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone were made using a round stainless steel test block with three horizontal lines and two vertical lines. The horizontal lines were used for evaluating the surface detail reproduction, and vertical lines were provided for the dimensional accuracy. For dimensional accuracy the length of the middle horizontal line in between vertical lines and the distance between the top and bottom horizontal line was measured using travelling microscope. And for surface detail reproduction three horizontal line of one segment were observed under stereomicroscope. Result: According to study results Addition Reaction Silicone is better than Alginate regarding quality of impression. Conclusion: In comparison to Alginate, Addition Reaction Silicone might have better performance about accuracy and surface detail reproduction. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v3i2.17996 Update Dent. Coll. j: 2013; 3 (2): 28-33

Dimensional Accuracy of Working Dies Fabricated by Different Impression Materials and Techniques: 3D Digital Assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Mai Soliman ◽  
Alhanoof Aldegheishem ◽  
Norah Alsubaie ◽  
Razan Alshamrani ◽  
Elzahraa Eldwakhly
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Molar Tooth ◽  
3D Scanner ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Digital Assessment ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Gingival Dimensions ◽  
One Step

Accuracy of dental impression plays a significant role in the success of definitive restorations. This study aimed to compare the dimensional accuracy of working dies fabricated using two different impression materials and techniques. Forty working dies fabricated from 40 impressions of preprepared mandibular first molar tooth replica stabilized in a jaw model to receive full coverage crown. Two different Polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression materials were used; Aquasil and Virtual. Two different impression techniques were used with each type of impression material; One-step and two-step. The working dies dimensional accuracy was measured in four dimensions and compared with that of the preprepared molar tooth replica using a digital caliper and 3D scanner. Based on a 3D scanner, there were a significant difference of dies fabricated by the two tested impression materials using the two-step impression technique in Mesiodistal-Gingival dimension (IIA and IIB) groups compared to the preprepared tooth replica with an average 0.370 μm (P < .005). A significant difference was observed of the dies fabricated by the two tested impression techniques using virtual impression. material in Mesiodistal Occlusal dimensions with an average 0.135 μm (P < .03), and in Mesiodistal-Gingival dimensions with an average 0.490 μm (P < .001) and Buccolingual-Gingival dimensions with an average 0.143 μm (P < .005) using Aquasil impression material compared to the preprepared molar tooth replica. Both impression materials (Aquasil and Virtual) and techniques (One-step and Two-step) used in this study produced working dies with clinically accepted dimensional accuracy.

Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 734-739
Author(s):  
Mohammed E Sayed ◽  
Bandar MA Al-Makramani ◽  
Fuad A Al-Sanabani ◽  
Mohamed S Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Technique ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Post Hoc

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intermixing brands of addition silicone impression materials on the dimensional accuracy of stone models using two-step putty-wash technique. Materials and methods Two common brands of addition silicone impression material (Express and Aquasil) were used in this study. A total of 40 impressions of a stainless steel model simulating a three-unit bridge were made, 10 impressions for each group. Accuracy was assessed by measuring two dimensions (inter-abutment and intra-abutment) on stone models obtained from impressions of the stainless steel model. Each sample was measured thrice and the mean value was calculated. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffe's post hoc test. Results The results indicated that each of the inter-abutment and intra-abutment dimensions of the stone models was significantly higher than those for the stainless steel model (p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in each of the inter-abutment and intra-abutment dimensions of the stone models among the four tested groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion The results obtained were statistically analyzed and the values of the inter-abutment and intra-abutment dimensions were all within the clinically acceptable range. Clinical significance Intermixing brands of additional silicone impression materials evaluated in this study did not affect the dimensional accuracy of obtained stone casts. This will help to minimize the wastage of materials due to lack of either light or putty consistency of the same brand of additional silicone impression material. How to cite this article Sayed ME, Al-Makramani BMA, Al-Sanabani FA, Mohamed MS. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(9):734-739.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document