Soil–Water-Structure Interaction Algorithm in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) with Application to Deep-Penetrating Problems

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 1850135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Wu ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Chun Wang ◽  
Jian Hua Wang

A fully coupled soil–water-structure interaction algorithm was presented in the framework of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). In this algorithm, soil–water interaction was simulated based on the two-phase mixture theory. Each phase of the mixture occupies part of the macroscopic mixture and satisfies its own conservation equations of mass and momentum. The Drucker–Prager model with nonassociated plastic flow rule was used to describe the constitutive behavior of soil. The water was treated as Newtonian fluid. Interaction between soil and water was modeled by the pore water pressure and the viscous drag force. The structure was considered as rigid and the interaction with soil/water was modeled by the frictional sliding contact algorithm. With this algorithm, it is possible to investigate pore water pressure, the effective stress and deformation of the soil undergoing large deformation. Moreover, the effect of the temporal and spatial evolution of soil porosity was taken into consideration. This study first examined the proposed algorithm for a U-tube seepage problem and a two-dimensional consolidation problem. Afterwards, the continuous deep penetrating process of the spudcan, which involved large soil deformation and complex soil–water-structure interaction, was simulated under axisymmetric conditions. The comparison with previous research indicates the robustness and applicability of the proposed algorithm. Furthermore, the proposed approach could be a potentially efficient tool helping to reveal the mechanism of soil failure in geotechnical, costal and ocean engineering.

Author(s):  
Nhu Nguyen ◽  
Krish P. Thiagarajan ◽  
Matthew Cameron

The purpose of this research is to validate the usage of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method in solving fluid-structure interaction problems as well as study its advantages and disadvantages compared to another well-known technique Boundary Element Method (BEM). The goal is achieved by 1) evaluating the Response Amplitude Operator (RAO) and 2) analyzing the drifting motion of a 1:10 scaled 3m-discus oceanographic buoy developed by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), using both experimental and numerical approaches. For the experimental study, the testing was carried out in an 8-m long wave tank and the buoy motions were measured using non-intrusive techniques. For numerical analysis, the project used DualSPHysics — open source code — and ANSYS AQWA — one of the leading software widely used in the marine applications — to simulate all the experimental scenarios via SPH and BEM techniques respectively. It is observed that while BEM has clear advantages in computational time and the ability to study applicable range of frequencies, SPH, in addition to its capability to simulate drifting motion of the floating structure, has shown to outperform the RAO predictions from BEM (especially in low frequency region). In higher frequency regions, the lack of experimental data hinders the conclusion on which method might be more suitable, as both have their own limitations.


Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiano Fragassa ◽  
Marko Topalovic ◽  
Ana Pavlovic ◽  
Snezana Vulovic

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and the finite element method (FEM) are often combined with the scope to model the interaction between structures and the surrounding fluids (FSI). There is the case, for instance, of aircrafts crashing on water or speedboats slamming into waves. Due to the high computational complexity, the influence of air is often neglected, limiting the analysis to the interaction between structure and water. On the contrary, this work aims to specifically investigate the effect of air when merged inside the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) computational models. Measures from experiments were used as a basis to validate estimations comparing results from models that include or exclude the presence of air. Outcomes generally showed a great correlation between simulation and experiments, with marginal differences in terms of accelerations, especially during the first phase of impact and considering the presence of air in the model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ersin Dinçer ◽  
Abdullah Demir ◽  
Zafer Bozkuş ◽  
Arris S. Tijsseling

Abstract In this study, a combination of the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and finite element method (FEM) solving the complex problem of interaction between fluid with free surface and an elastic structure is studied. A brief description of SPH and FEM is presented. Contact mechanics is used for the coupling between fluid and structure, which are simulated with SPH and FEM, respectively. In the proposed method, to couple mesh-free and mesh-based methods, fluid and structure are solved together by a complete stiffness matrix instead of iterative predictive–corrective or master–slave methods. In addition, fully dynamic large-deformation analysis is carried out in FEM by taking into account mass and damping of the elastic structure. Accordingly, a two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction (FSI) code is developed and validated with two different experiments available in the literature. The results of the numerical method are in good agreement with the experiments. In addition, a novel laboratory experiment on a dam break problem with elastic gate in which the length of the initial water column is larger than its height is conducted. The main difference between the previous experiments and the one conducted in this study is that an upward water motion parallel to the elastic gate is observed at the upstream side of the gate. This motion is captured with the numerical method.


2018 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 189-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelkader Krimi ◽  
Sofiane Khelladi ◽  
Xesús Nogueira ◽  
Michael Deligant ◽  
Riadh Ata ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document