scholarly journals On the linear stability of polytropic fluid spheres in R2 gravity

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 2050165 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Dzhunushaliev ◽  
V. Folomeev

Within [Formula: see text] gravity, we study the linear stability of strongly gravitating spherically symmetric configurations supported by a polytropic fluid. All calculations are carried out in the Jordan frame. It is demonstrated that, as in general relativity, the transition from stable to unstable systems occurs at the maximum of the curve mass-central density of the fluid.

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Merced Montesinos ◽  
Diego Gonzalez ◽  
Rodrigo Romero ◽  
Mariano Celada

We report off-shell Noether currents obtained from off-shell Noether potentials for first-order general relativity described by n-dimensional Palatini and Holst Lagrangians including the cosmological constant. These off-shell currents and potentials are achieved by using the corresponding Lagrangian and the off-shell Noether identities satisfied by diffeomorphisms generated by arbitrary vector fields, local SO(n) or SO(n−1,1) transformations, ‘improved diffeomorphisms’, and the ‘generalization of local translations’ of the orthonormal frame and the connection. A remarkable aspect of our approach is that we do not use Noether’s theorem in its direct form. By construction, the currents are off-shell conserved and lead naturally to the definition of off-shell Noether charges. We also study what we call the ‘half off-shell’ case for both Palatini and Holst Lagrangians. In particular, we find that the resulting diffeomorphism and local SO(3,1) or SO(4) off-shell Noether currents and potentials for the Holst Lagrangian generically depend on the Immirzi parameter, which holds even in the ‘half off-shell’ and on-shell cases. We also study Killing vector fields in the ‘half off-shell’ and on-shell cases. The current theoretical framework is illustrated for the ‘half off-shell’ case in static spherically symmetric and Friedmann–Lemaitre–Robertson–Walker spacetimes in four dimensions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 2155-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
ASHER YAHALOM

To the ordinary human it is obvious that there is a clear distinction between the spatial dimensions, in which one can go either way, and the temporal dimension, in which one seems only to move forward. But the uniqueness of time is also rooted in the standard presentation of general relativity, in which the metric of space–time is locally Lorentzian, i.e. ημν = diag (1, -1, -1, -1). This is presented as an independent axiom of the theory, which cannot be deduced. In this essay I will claim otherwise. I will show that the existence of time should not be enforced on the gravitational theory of general relativity but rather should be deduced from it. The method of choice is linear stability analysis of flat space–times.


1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. L69-L72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah Haggag ◽  
Joseph Hajj-Boutros

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 1450068 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Goldoni ◽  
M. F. A. da Silva ◽  
G. Pinheiro ◽  
R. Chan

In this paper, we have studied nonstationary radiative spherically symmetric spacetime, in general covariant theory (U(1) extension) of Hořava–Lifshitz (HL) gravity without the projectability condition and in the infrared (IR) limit. The Newtonian prepotential φ was assumed null. We have shown that there is not the analogue of the Vaidya's solution in the Hořava–Lifshitz Theory (HLT), as we know in the General Relativity Theory (GRT). Therefore, we conclude that the gauge field A should interact with the null radiation field of the Vaidya's spacetime in the HLT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. G. L. Nashed ◽  
S. D. Odintsov ◽  
V. K. Oikonomou

AbstractIn this paper we shall consider spherically symmetric spacetime solutions describing the interior of stellar compact objects, in the context of higher-order curvature theory of the $${{\mathrm {f(R)}}}$$ f ( R ) type. We shall derive the non-vacuum field equations of the higher-order curvature theory, without assuming any specific form of the $${{\mathrm {f(R)}}}$$ f ( R ) theory, specifying the analysis for a spherically symmetric spacetime with two unknown functions. We obtain a system of highly non-linear differential equations, which consists of four differential equations with six unknown functions. To solve such a system, we assume a specific form of metric potentials, using the Krori–Barua ansatz. We successfully solve the system of differential equations, and we derive all the components of the energy–momentum tensor. Moreover, we derive the non-trivial general form of $${{\mathrm {f(R)}}}$$ f ( R ) that may generate such solutions and calculate the dynamic Ricci scalar of the anisotropic star. Accordingly, we calculate the asymptotic form of the function $${\mathrm {f(R)}}$$ f ( R ) , which is a polynomial function. We match the derived interior solution with the exterior one, which was derived in [1], with the latter also resulting to a non-trivial form of the Ricci scalar. Notably but rather expected, the exterior solution differs from the Schwarzschild one in the context of general relativity. The matching procedure will eventually relate two constants with the mass and radius of the compact stellar object. We list the necessary conditions that any compact anisotropic star must satisfy and explain in detail that our model bypasses all of these conditions for a special compact star $$\textit{Her X--1}$$ Her X - - 1 , which has an estimated mass and radius $$(mass = 0.85 \pm 0.15M_{\circledcirc }\ and\ radius = 8.1 \pm 0.41~\text {km}$$ ( m a s s = 0.85 ± 0.15 M ⊚ a n d r a d i u s = 8.1 ± 0.41 km ). Moreover, we study the stability of this model by using the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation and adiabatic index, and we show that the considered model is different and more stable compared to the corresponding models in the context of general relativity.


Universe ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 403
Author(s):  
Aden Jowsey ◽  
Matt Visser

Dimensional analysis shows that the speed of light and Newton’s constant of gravitation can be combined to define a quantity F*=c4/GN with the dimensions of force (equivalently, tension). Then in any physical situation we must have Fphysical=fF*, where the quantity f is some dimensionless function of dimensionless parameters. In many physical situations explicit calculation yields f=O(1), and quite often f≤1/4. This has led multiple authors to suggest a (weak or strong) maximum force/maximum tension conjecture. Working within the framework of standard general relativity, we will instead focus on idealized counter-examples to this conjecture, paying particular attention to the extent to which the counter-examples are physically reasonable. The various idealized counter-examples we shall explore strongly suggest that one should not put too much credence into any truly universal maximum force/maximum tension conjecture. Specifically, idealized fluid spheres on the verge of gravitational collapse will generically violate the weak (and strong) maximum force conjectures. If one wishes to retain any truly general notion of “maximum force” then one will have to very carefully specify precisely which forces are to be allowed within the domain of discourse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document