Nonlinear Bending Analysis of Hyperelastic Plates Using FSDT and Meshless Collocation Method Based on Radial Basis Function

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 2150007
Author(s):  
Shahram Hosseini ◽  
Gholamhossein Rahimi
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Radial Basis Function ◽  
Collocation Method ◽  
Basis Function ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Radial Basis ◽  
Meshless Collocation ◽  
Element Method

This paper investigates the nonlinear bending analysis of a hyperelastic plate via neo-Hookean strain energy function. The first-order shear deformation plate theory (FSDPT) is used for the formulation of the field variables. Also, the nonlinear Lagrangian strains are considered via the right Cauchy–Green tensor. The governing equations and nonlinear boundary conditions are derived using Euler–Lagrange relations. The meshless collocation method based on radial basis function is used to discretize the governing equations of the hyperelastic plate. Square and circular plates are studied to evaluate the accuracy of the meshless collocation method based on thin-plate spline (TPS) and multiquadric (MQ) and logarithmic thin-plate spline (LTPS) radial basis function. Also, the results of the meshless method are compared to those of the finite element method. In some cases, the meshless method is more efficient than the finite element method due to no meshing. The linear and nonlinear natural boundary conditions are directly imposed on the stiffness matrix and are compared to each other. The maximum differences between linear and nonlinear natural boundary conditions are 1.43%. The von-Mises stress using meshless collocation method based on TPS basis function is compared to those of the finite element method.

Physical statement of the problem for a numerical model of soil freezing and heaving taking into account heat and mass transfer

2021 ◽  
pp. 244-256
Author(s):  
Виктор Григорьевич Чеверев ◽  
Евгений Викторович Сафронов ◽  
Алексей Александрович Коротков ◽  
Александр Сергеевич Чернятин
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Numerical Model ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Heat And Mass Transfer ◽  
Soil Freezing ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Freezing Front ◽  
Element Method

Существуют два основных подхода решения задачи тепломассопереноса при численном моделировании промерзания грунтов: 1) решение методом конечных разностей с учетом граничных условий (границей, например, является фронт промерзания); 2) решение методом конечных элементов без учета границ модели. Оба подхода имеют существенные недостатки, что оставляет проблему решения задачи для численной модели промерзания грунтов острой и актуальной. В данной работе представлена физическая постановка промерзания, которая позволяет создать численную модель, базирующуюся на решении методом конечных элементов, но при этом отражающую ход фронта промерзания - то есть модель, в которой объединены оба подхода к решению задачи промерзания грунтов. Для подтверждения корректности модели был проделан ряд экспериментов по физическому моделированию промерзания модельного грунта и выполнен сравнительный анализ полученных экспериментальных данных и результатов расчетов на базе представленной численной модели с такими же граничными условиями, как в экспериментах. There are two basic approaches to solving the problem of heat and mass transfer in the numerical modeling of soil freezing: 1) using the finite difference method taking into account boundary conditions (the boundary, for example, is the freezing front); 2) using the finite element method without consideration of model boundaries. Both approaches have significant drawbacks, which leaves the issue of solving the problem for the numerical model of soil freezing acute and up-to-date. This article provides the physical setting of freezing that allows us to create a numerical model based on the solution by the finite element method, but at the same time reflecting the route of the freezing front, i.e. the model that combines both approaches to solving the problem of soil freezing. In order to confirm the correctness of the model, a number of experiments on physical modeling of model soil freezing have been performed, and a comparative analysis of the experimental data obtained and the calculation results based on the provided numerical model with the same boundary conditions as in the experiments was performed.

scholarly journals Calculation of the goffered multilayered composite cylindrical shells by using the finite element method

1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-128
Author(s):  
Pham Thi Toan
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Cylindrical Shells ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Multilayered Composite ◽  
Internal Forces ◽  
External Loads ◽  
Element Method ◽  
Composite Cylindrical Shells

In the present paper, the goffered multilayered composite cylindrical shells is directly calculated by finite element method. Numerical results on displacements, internal forces and moments are obtained for various kinds of external loads and different boundary conditions.

A novel local radial basis function collocation method for multi-dimensional piezoelectric problems

2021 ◽  
pp. 1045389X2110572
Author(s):  
Amir Noorizadegan ◽  
Der Liang Young ◽  
Chuin-Shan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Radial Basis Function ◽  
Collocation Method ◽  
Basis Function ◽  
Shape Parameter ◽  
Piezoelectric Medium ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Mechanical Field ◽  
Radial Basis ◽  
2D And 3D

The local radial basis function collocation method (LRBFCM), a strong-form formulation of the meshless numerical method, is proposed for solving piezoelectric medium problems. The proposed numerical algorithm is based on the local Kansa method using variable shape parameter. We introduce a novel technique for the determination of shape parameter in the LRBFCM, which leads to greater accuracy, and simplicity. The implemented algorithm is first verified with a 2D Poisson equation. Then, we employed LRBFCM in a numerical simulation for 2D and 3D piezoelectric problems involving mutual coupling of the electric field and elastodynamic equations for mechanical field. The presented meshless method is verified using corresponding results obtained from the finite element method and moving least squares meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method. In particular, the 2D piezoelectric problem is verified with an exact solution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document