CO2 LASER PLUS PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY VERSUS CO2 LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CONDYLOMA ACUMINATUM: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY

2012 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 1150008 ◽  
Author(s):  
HUIFENG LIU ◽  
PING ZHANG ◽  
XIANGJIE AN ◽  
LIU YANG ◽  
YAN LI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Co2 Laser ◽  
Aminolevulinic Acid ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Red Light ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Condyloma Acuminatum ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Laser Group

To compare the efficacy and safety of CO2 laser plus 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy (PDT) with CO2 laser for the treatment of multiple condyloma acuminatum (CA), 120 patients with multiple CA were allocated into two groups — combined group ( CO2 laser plus ALA-PDT, n = 60) and CO2 laser group ( CO2 laser plus placebo-PDT, n = 60). After CO2 laser, a 20% ALA or a placebo solution was applied to the CA area 3 h before illumination with red light (635 nm, 100 mW/cm2, 80 J/cm2). The treatment was repeated seven days after the first treatment if the lesions were not completely resolved. The complete response rate, recurrence rate and adverse effects in the two groups were analyzed. After two treatments, the complete response rates in the CO2 laser group and combined group were 100% (509/509) and 100% (507/507) in the CA (p > 0.05), respectively. The recurrence rates in the CO2 laser group and combined group were 44.9% (229/509) and 10.6% (54/507) in the CA (p < 0.05), respectively. The adverse effects in CO2 laser group was more than that in combined group. The combined group is a more effective treatment for multiple CA compared with CO2 laser group. T/S. Style the highlighted text as abstract.

scholarly journals A New Light-Emitting, Fabric-Based Device for Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Intra-Individual, Phase II Noninferiority Study (the Phosistos Study) (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Vignion-Dewalle ◽  
Henry Abi Rached ◽  
Elise Thecua ◽  
Fabienne Lecomte ◽  
Pascal Deleporte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Actinic Keratosis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Red Light ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Individual Phase

BACKGROUND Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common early in situ skin carcinoma caused by long-term sun exposure and usually develops on sun-exposed skin areas. Left untreated, AK may progress to squamous cell carcinoma. To prevent such risk, most clinicians routinely treat AK. Therapy options for AK include cryotherapy, topical treatments, curettage, excision surgery, and photodynamic therapy (PDT). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the noninferiority, in terms of efficacy at 3 months, of a PDT protocol involving a new light-emitting device (PDT using the Phosistos protocol [P-PDT]) compared with the conventional protocol (PDT using the conventional protocol [C-PDT]) in the treatment of AK. METHODS In this randomized, controlled, multicenter, intra-individual, phase II noninferiority clinical study, subjects with AK of the forehead and scalp are treated with P-PDT on one area and with C-PDT on the contralateral area. In both areas, lesions are prepared and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is applied. Thirty minutes after MAL application, the P-PDT area is exposed to red light at low irradiance (1.3 mW/cm2) for 2.5 hours so that a light dose of 12 J/cm2 is achieved. In the control area (C-PDT area), a 37 J/cm2 red light irradiation is performed 3 hours after MAL application. Recurrent AK at 3 months is retreated. The primary end point is the lesion complete response rate at 3 months. Secondary end points include pain scores at 1 day, local tolerance at 7 days, lesion complete response rate at 6 months, cosmetic outcome at 3 and 6 months, and patient-reported quality of life and satisfaction throughout the study. A total of 45 patients needs to be recruited. RESULTS Clinical investigations are complete: 46 patients were treated with P-PDT on one area (n=285 AK) and with C-PDT on the contralateral area (n=285 AK). Data analysis is ongoing, and statistical results will be available in the first half of 2019. CONCLUSIONS In case of noninferiority in efficacy and superiority in tolerability of P-PDT compared with C-PDT, P-PDT could become the treatment of choice for AK. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03076892; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03076892 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/779qqVKek) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR DERR1-10.2196/12990

scholarly journals Treatment of cutaneous lichen planus with ALA-mediated topical photodynamic therapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 1540004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Xia Fan ◽  
Ling-Lin Zhang ◽  
Hong-Wei Wang ◽  
Pei-Ru Wang ◽  
Zheng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Lichen Planus ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Aminolevulinic Acid ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Chinese Patients

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of cutaneous lichen planus (LP). Methods: A total of 17 symptomatic LP lesions in 7 Chinese patients were assessed. ALA cream (10%) was applied topically to LP lesions for 3 h. The lesions were irradiated with a 635 nm diode laser at the dose level of 100 J/cm2. The treatment was repeated at two-week intervals. Clinical assessment was conducted before each treatment. Follow-up was performed once a month for up to six months. Results: Lesions showed significant improvement after one to four courses of treatments. Complete response was achieved in 13 lesions (five patients) and partial remission in four lesions (two patients). The complete response rate was 71%. There was no significant side effects except the feeling of pain that most patients could tolerate. Follow-up of five patients who achieved complete response showed no signs of recurrence. Conclusion: Topical ALA PDT is effective in the treatment of cutaneous LP.

Safety and efficacy of current alternatives in the topical treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review

Parasitology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 144 (8) ◽  
pp. 995-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
PRISCILA WOLF NASSIF ◽  
TATIANE FRANÇA PERLES DE MELLO ◽  
TAÍSA ROCHA NAVASCONI ◽  
CAMILA ALVES MOTA ◽  
IZABEL GALHARDO DEMARCHI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Aminolevulinic Acid ◽  
Red Light ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Acid Hydrochloride ◽  
Topical Treatments ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Reporting Rates

SUMMARYStudies of topical treatments for leishmaniasis were systematically reviewed, to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, safety and any adverse effects of these treatments. The papers identified in the databases PubMed and Web of Knowledge involved eight studies with a total of 1744 patients. The majority of trials was from Iran (4/8), covered a period of 8 years (2003–2011), and included patients 4–85 years of age. The most frequent Leishmania species in the studies were L. tropica (4/8) and L. major (2/8). The treatments administered were thermotherapy, paromomycin and combinations, CO2 laser, 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (10%) plus visible red light (633 nm) and cryotherapy. Six articles reported cure rates over 80·0%. Six studies reported on failure rates, three of them reporting rates lower than 10%. Four studies did not report relapses or recurrences, while the other studies reported low rates (1·8–6·3%). The most common adverse effects of the topical treatments were redness/erythema, pain, pruritus burning, oedema, vesicles and hyper- or hypopigmentation. The results provide strong evidence that the treatments topical evaluated showed high cure rates, safety and effectiveness, with low side-effects, relapse and recurrence rates, except for cryotherapy, which showed a moderate cure rate.

Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Bowen’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Wen-Li Xue ◽  
Jia-Qi Ruan ◽  
Hong-Ye Liu ◽  
Hong-Xia He
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Bowen’S Disease ◽  
Bowen's Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Photodynamic therapy is an established treatment option for Bowen’s disease. Our meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and recurrence of photodynamic therapy or other topical treatments (5-fluorouracil, cryotherapy) and of photodynamic therapy alone or in combination with other therapies (ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser or plum-blossom needle) for the treatment of Bowen’s disease. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Trials that met our inclusion criteria were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, and meta-analyses were conducted with RevMan V.5.4. The risk of bias was estimated with the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tools. Complete response rate, recurrence, pain/visual analogue scale score, cosmetic outcome, and adverse events were considered as outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 2,439 records initially retrieved, 8 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. According to our analyses, photodynamic therapy exhibited a significantly higher complete response rate (RR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.01, 1.84], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 86%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), less recurrence (RR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.30, 0.95], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and better cosmetic outcome (RR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.15, 1.56], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002) compared with other treatments. Moreover, there was a significant difference between the complete response rate of photodynamic therapy combined with ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser and that of photodynamic therapy (RR = 1.85, 95% CI [1.38, 2.49], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Photodynamic therapy combined with ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser or plum-blossom needle also showed significantly less recurrence (RR = 0.21, 95% CI [0.09, 0.51], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.0005) and a lower visual analogue scale score (RR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.06, 0.96], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) than photodynamic therapy alone. However, there was no significant difference in the complete response rate between photodynamic therapy combined with ablative continuous CO<sub>2</sub> laser and photodynamic therapy combined with ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser (RR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.54, 1.86], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> not applicable, <i>p</i> = 1.00). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This meta-analysis shows that photodynamic therapy can be used in the treatment of Bowen’s disease with better efficacy, less recurrence, and better cosmetic outcomes than cryotherapy and 5-FU. Some methods, including ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser, can be applied in combination with photodynamic therapy to improve efficacy. However, which laser-assisted photodynamic therapy scheme has the most advantages in the treatment of Bowen’s disease warrants further exploration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document