Moderator Chatbot for Deliberative Discussion

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (CSCW1) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Soomin Kim ◽  
Jinsu Eun ◽  
Joseph Seering ◽  
Joonhwan Lee
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Discussion

Deliberative Discussion as an Innovative Teaching Strategy

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 272-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Janiszewski Goodin ◽  
David Stein
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Strategy ◽  
Innovative Teaching ◽  
Deliberative Discussion ◽  
Innovative Teaching Strategy

Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-57
Author(s):  
Tarik Abdel-Monem ◽  
Mitchel N. Herian ◽  
Nancy Shank
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Medical Records ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Public Attitudes ◽  
Public Perceptions ◽  
Deliberative Discussion ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Opinion Polls

Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.

scholarly journals Blogging the 2009 Queensland State Election

2012 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-85
Author(s):  
Megan Kimber
Keyword(s):  
Public Sphere ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Ideal Types ◽  
Political Blogs ◽  
Public Spheres ◽  
The Public ◽  
Deliberative Discussion ◽  
The Public Sphere ◽  
Political Blog

The internet has become important in political communication in Australia. Using Habermas's ideal types, it is argued that political blogs can be viewed as public spheres that might provide scope for the expansion of deliberative democratic discussion. This hypothesis is explored through analysis of the group political blog Pineapple Party Time. It is evident that the bloggers and those who commented on their posts were highly knowledgeable about and interested in politics. From an examination of these posts and the comments on them, Pineapple Party Time did act as a public sphere to some degree, and did provide for the deliberative discussion essential for a democracy, but it was largely restricted to Crikey readers. For a deliberative public sphere and democratic discussion to function to any extent, the public sphere must be open to all citizens, who need to have the access and knowledge to engage in deliberative discussion.

Staging the development and implementation of a Coordinated Cancer Care Model using risk-based survivorship care: A deliberative discussion among multiple stakeholders.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18027-e18027
Author(s):  
Dominique Tremblay ◽  
Karine Bilodeau ◽  
Catherine Prady ◽  
Nassera Touati
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Cancer Risk Assessment ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Deliberative Discussion

e18027 Background: Risk-based survivorship care has become one of the best practices care recommended by the Institute of Medicine. It involves coordinated follow-up services based on the risk of long-term and late effects, cancer recurrence and an individualised care plan. Risk-based care requires specific knowledge about cancer histology, treatments, and potential consequences of cancer and its treatment to guide surveillance, screening and counseling. Diagnostic and treatment details and their associated health risks may not be known by survivors or their multiple care providers. Implementing risk-based survivorship care is often challenging for providers. This presentation report on a deliberative workshop on the development and planning of a risk-based survivorship care model. Methods: The deliberative workshop is part of a larger study in two regional cancer networks in Quebec, selected for there differences (geographic location, population size, academic mandate). A total of 25 key informants (researchers, managers, family physicians, oncologists, cancer survivors, nurses, social workers) participated into the workshop on October 2nd, 2018. Deliberative discussion between local stakeholders followed by videoconference, getting together stakeholders from both networks was drawn from Gupta et al 3 steps: 1) identify the problem; 2) develop the innovation; 3) design the pilot test. Results: Although the context of the network was different, main issues were similar: 1) there is no common understanding of the concept “risk-based survivorship care”, either for survivors, primary care providers and cancer specialist; 2) “silo functioning” within and between teams is a main barriers to ensure care coordination based on risk assessment; 3) organizational assets should be formalized to insure safe coordination of survivorship care based on cancer risk assessment. Conclusions: Given the recognized importance of risk-based survivorship care and implementation challenges, deliberative discussions may provide a useful lens to inform translation of this model into real practices and guide empirical studies.

Preventing Groupthink Risk through Deliberative Discussion

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene E. Turner ◽  
Anthony R. Pratkanis
Keyword(s):  
Social Identity ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Identity Maintenance ◽  
The Social ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Deliberative Discussion ◽  
Maintenance Model

This study examined the role of deliberative discussion strategies in improving group performance under conditions associated with groupthink. Three-person groups solved a complex decision task in one randomly assigned condition of a 2 (collective threat: low vs. high) by 2 (deliberative discussion strategies: none vs. provided) between-subjects design. All groups were also given a manipulation designed to induce high cohesion consistent with a social identity maintenance framework. Highly cohesive groups facing a collective threat produced poorer quality decisions (indicative of groupthink) when not provided with discussion strategies than groups in all other conditions. However, when provided with deliberative discussion strategies, highly cohesive groups facing a collective threat produced the highest quality decisions. Results were consistent with the social identity maintenance model of groupthink.

The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments

2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Jackman ◽  
Paul M. Sniderman
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Discussion

Building Capacity Through Deliberative Discussion

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Martha C. Monroe ◽  
Alicia Betancourt
Keyword(s):  
Building Capacity ◽  
Deliberative Discussion

Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions

2015 ◽  
pp. 1987-2008
Author(s):  
Tarik Abdel-Monem ◽  
Mitchel N. Herian ◽  
Nancy Shank
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Medical Records ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Public Attitudes ◽  
Public Perceptions ◽  
Deliberative Discussion ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Opinion Polls

Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document