A framework for evaluating social acceptability of spatial computing devices

interactions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Arathi Sethumadhavan ◽  
Josh Lovejoy ◽  
David Mondello
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 115-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Wilkens

Written texts, especially sacred texts, can be handled in different ways. They can be read for semantic content; or they can be materially experienced, touched, or even be inhaled or drunk. I argue that literacy ideologies regulate social acceptability of specific semantic and somatic text practices. Drinking or fumigating the Qurʾan as a medical procedure is a highly contested literacy event in which two different ideologies are drawn upon simultaneously. I employ the linguistic model of codeswitching to highlight central aspects of this event: a more somatic ideology of literacy enables the link to medicine, while a more semantic ideology connects the practice to theological discourses on the sacredness of the Qurʾan as well as to the tradition of Prophetic medicine. Opposition to and ridicule of the practice, however, comes from representatives of an ideology of semantic purity, including some Islamic theologians and most Western scholars of Islam. Qurʾanic potions thus constitute an ideal point of entry for analyzing different types of literacy ideologies being followed in religious traditions.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry C. Daniel ◽  
Michael Valdiserri ◽  
Carrie R. Daniel ◽  
Pamela Jakes ◽  
Pamela Jakes ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Brunson ◽  
Linda E. Kruger ◽  
Catherine B. Tyler ◽  
Susan A. Schroeder

Author(s):  
Soichiro Morishita ◽  
Masanori Takano ◽  
Hideaki Takeda ◽  
Faiza Mahdaoui ◽  
Fumiaki Taka ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Johannes de Fine Licht ◽  
Andreas Kuster ◽  
Tiziano De Matteis ◽  
Tal Ben-Nun ◽  
Dominic Hofer ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla J. Berg ◽  
Erin Stratton ◽  
Gillian L. Schauer ◽  
Michael Lewis ◽  
Yanwen Wang ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 538-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. J. Bancroft ◽  
A. M. Skrimshire ◽  
S. Simkin

SummaryThis study investigates the reasons people give for taking overdoses of drugs. A representative sample of 128 subjects were interviewed immediately after their recovery from an overdose. During the interview they were given alternative reasons for taking overdoses and asked to choose any that applied to them. Spontaneous comments about suicidal intent were also recorded. Of the subjects, 44 per cent indicated that they had wanted to die. On the basis of their choices 33 per cent were ‘seeking help’, 42 per cent ‘escaping from the situation’, 52 per cent ‘obtaining relief from a terrible state of mind’ and 19 per cent ‘trying to influence someone’. The association between these various reasons and other expected effects or feelings associated with the act were examined by means of multidimensional scaling analysis. In addition, the characteristics of those expressing suicidal intent and other reasons were studied, together with such consequences as toxic effects and psychiatric after-care. The possibility is discussed that a large proportion of those indicating suicidal intent do so either to gain social acceptability for their act or to influence helping agencies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document