Design and Initial Flight Tests of a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Powered Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV)

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 433-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Ward ◽  
Norhisyam Jenal

Author(s):  
Ivan V. Vasyukov ◽  
Nikita A. Faddeev ◽  
Andrew S. Kramarov ◽  
Andrew A. Gummel ◽  
Vladimir S. Puzin ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 279-285
Author(s):  
Christophe De Wagter ◽  
Bart Remes ◽  
Rick Ruijsink ◽  
Freek van Tienen ◽  
Erik van der Horst

Flight endurance is still a bottleneck for many types of unmanned air vehicle (UAV) applications. While battery technology improves over the years, for flights that last an entire day, batteries are still insufficient. Hydrogen-powered fuel cells offer an interesting alternative but pose stringent requirements on the platform. The required cruise power must be sufficiently low and flying with a pressurized tank poses new safety and shape constraints. This paper proposes a hybrid transitioning UAV that is optimized towards carrying a hydrogen tank and fuel cell. Hover is achieved using 12 redundant propellers connected to a dual Controller Area Network (CAN) bus and dual power supply. Forward flight is achieved using a tandem wing configuration. The tandem wing not only minimizes the required wingspan to minimize perturbations from gusts during hover, but it also handles the very large pitch inertia of the inline pressure tank and fuel cell very well. During forward flight, 8 of the 12 propellers are folded while the tip propellers counteract the tip vortexes. The propulsion is tested on a force balance and the selected fuel cell is tested in the lab. Finally, a prototype is built and tested in-flight using battery power. Stable hover, good transitioning properties, and stable forward flight are demonstrated.



2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Mohamed Elaguab ◽  
Tayeb Allaoui ◽  
Abdelkader Chaker ◽  
Abdellah Kouzou ◽  
Lalia Merabet


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Brelje ◽  
Joaquim R. R. A. Martins


2021 ◽  
Vol 489 ◽  
pp. 229450
Author(s):  
Sahar Foorginezhad ◽  
Masoud Mohseni-Dargah ◽  
Zahra Falahati ◽  
Rouzbeh Abbassi ◽  
Amir Razmjou ◽  
...  


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 4384
Author(s):  
Hanhee Kim ◽  
Niklas Hartmann ◽  
Maxime Zeller ◽  
Renato Luise ◽  
Tamer Soylu

This paper shows the results of an in-depth techno-economic analysis of the public transport sector in a small to midsize city and its surrounding area. Public battery-electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses are comparatively evaluated by means of a total cost of ownership (TCO) model building on historical data and a projection of market prices. Additionally, a structural analysis of the public transport system of a specific city is performed, assessing best fitting bus lines for the use of electric or hydrogen busses, which is supported by a brief acceptance evaluation of the local citizens. The TCO results for electric buses show a strong cost decrease until the year 2030, reaching 23.5% lower TCOs compared to the conventional diesel bus. The optimal electric bus charging system will be the opportunity (pantograph) charging infrastructure. However, the opportunity charging method is applicable under the assumption that several buses share the same station and there is a “hotspot” where as many as possible bus lines converge. In the case of electric buses for the year 2020, the parameter which influenced the most on the TCO was the battery cost, opposite to the year 2030 in where the bus body cost and fuel cost parameters are the ones that dominate the TCO, due to the learning rate of the batteries. For H2 buses, finding a hotspot is not crucial because they have a similar range to the diesel ones as well as a similar refueling time. H2 buses until 2030 still have 15.4% higher TCO than the diesel bus system. Considering the benefits of a hypothetical scaling-up effect of hydrogen infrastructures in the region, the hydrogen cost could drop to 5 €/kg. In this case, the overall TCO of the hydrogen solution would drop to a slightly lower TCO than the diesel solution in 2030. Therefore, hydrogen buses can be competitive in small to midsize cities, even with limited routes. For hydrogen buses, the bus body and fuel cost make up a large part of the TCO. Reducing the fuel cost will be an important aspect to reduce the total TCO of the hydrogen bus.



2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2635-2646
Author(s):  
Nabeel Ahsan ◽  
Ans Al Rashid ◽  
Asad A. Zaidi ◽  
Ramsha Imran ◽  
Sikandar Abdul Qadir


2020 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 102897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kelley ◽  
Aimee Krafft ◽  
Michael Kuby ◽  
Oscar Lopez ◽  
Rhian Stotts ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document