Effect of Acoustic Cavitation on Dissolved Gases and their Characterization during Megasonic Cleaning

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bong-Kyun Kang ◽  
Min-Su Kim ◽  
Seung-Ho Lee ◽  
Hongseong Sohn ◽  
Jin-Goo Park
2012 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Camerotto ◽  
Stefan de Gendt ◽  
Marc Hauptmann ◽  
Denis Shamiryan ◽  
Marc M. Heyns ◽  
...  

An improved fundamental understanding of the megasonic cleaning process is necessary to optimize cleaning efficiency and minimize the unwanted damage to fragile structures. Argon sonoluminescence (SL) measurements are done to achieve an improved insight in the collapse threshold and behavior of microbubbles. This paper reports on acoustic cavitation by means of Ar Sonoluminescence (SL) investigation achieved with a dedicated test cell, a photomultiplier tube (PMT) and a gasification system. The results show an increase in SL signal as a function of the applied acoustic power density. An increase in Ar concentration results in a decrease in SL signal. Furthermore, a clear hysteretic behavior in the SL signal is identified when ramping the acoustic power up and down. This hysteresis effect can be attributed to the nucleation of bubbles during the increasing branch of the power loop. Finally the time evolution of SL light after the switching on of the acoustic transducers revealed the existence of a delay time.


2014 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Zhao ◽  
R. Balachandran ◽  
P.R. Madigappu ◽  
P. Yam ◽  
C. Zanelli ◽  
...  

Emerging ultrasonic and megasonic cleaning demands in various applications (solar cell, storage devices, wafer and mask cleaning, etc.) dictate the need to understand the acoustic cavitation under different operating conditions to optimize efficiency of cleaning and reduce damage. Major parameters that affect cavitation include frequency of the sound field, operating power of the transducer and the cleaning chemistry. Previous studies have reported the use of common techniques such as multi-bubble sonoluminescence [1] and sono-electrochemistry [2] to understand acoustic cavitation. The disadvantage with sonoluminescence technique is that it characterizes cavitation mainly in the bulk of the solution, which may not be pertinent to wafer cleaning applications where the interest is in understanding cavitation phenomena close to the wafer surface. Although, sono-electrochemical techniques employing microelectrode are capable of measuring cavitation in the vicinity of a solid surface, they are limited to measurements on an extremely small area due to the miniscule size (5-25 μm) of the electrode. In this context, hydrophone measurements offer significant benefit as they can be taken near a solid surface as well as on a relative large area (1-2 mm diameter) of the pressure sensitive tip.


2009 ◽  
Vol 145-146 ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaldert Zijlstra ◽  
Tom Janssens ◽  
Kurt Wostyn ◽  
Michel Versluis ◽  
Paul W. Mertens ◽  
...  

Since the introduction of megasonic cleaning in semiconductor industry a debate has been going on about which physical mechanism is responsible for the removal of particles. Because of the high frequency range it was believed that acoustic cavitation could not occur and cleaning was attributed to phenomena like Eckart and Schlichting streaming or pressure build-up on particles [1,2]. Recently it was shown however, that the removal of nanoparticles is closely related to the presence of acoustic cavitation in megasonic cleaning systems [3]. The dependence of particle removal efficiency on the concentration of dissolved gas and the presence of sonoluminescence are clear (but indirect) indications that the underlying mechanism is related to bubble dynamics. As the requirements for cleaning in semiconductor processing are ever more stringent, it becomes necessary to obtain a thorough understanding of the physical behavior of acoustically driven microbubbles in contact with a solid wall. In particular, the forces exerted thereby which might clean or damage a substrate are of interest. Here, a step in this direction is taken by visualization of both the removal of nanoparticles and the sub-microsecond timescale dynamics of the cavitation bubbles responsible thereof.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Muralidharan ◽  
Manish Keswani ◽  
Hrishikesh Shende ◽  
Pierre Deymier ◽  
Srini Raghavan ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Konovalova ◽  
I. S. Akhatov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document